The greatest success story in physics

[Cypress]

I have a question... Why does this model show the 'Big Bang' as being mono-directional? The explosion of anything is far more random and omni-directional. That seems to me to present a problem...

Seems to me they wanted to emphasize time, which is unidirectional. The focus of the carton is the evolution of the universe through time. They attempted to represent the 3-d spatial expansion of the universe through time by graphically implying a third dimension, projected into and out of the two dimensional plane of the cartoon.

 

[Into the Night]

SOrry gfm. I didn't mean to respond to you incorrectly.

Responding to gfm is not responding to me either, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

You're making progress.

You've backtracked away from claiming there is no such thing as the Standard Model and shifted to trying to verbally finesse what the SM represents.

There is no such thing as a Standard Model, Sock.

Good attempt at trying to tiptoe away from your original claim!

I have not changed anything.

I've been calling it a framework myself,

It is not a framework either.

because it's actually an overarching scientific scheme

It has nothing to do with science, Sock.

that includes a system of inter-related theories

It is not a theory or set of theories, Sock.

like quantum chromodynamics, quantum electrodynamics, the electroweak theory, and field and particle theory.

Buzzword fallacies.
None of these are theories either.

 

[Into the Night]

You would have to be an active consumer of science journalism to grasp it.

Science isn't a journal, magazine, or newspaper, Sock.

The gauge bosons shown in all graphical illustrations of the Standard Model are the force carriers that mediate the interactions between forces, fields, and particles. The photon mediates the electromagnetic force (quantum electrodynamics), the gluon mediates the strong nuclear interactions with particles (quantum chromodynamics), and the W+, W-, and Z bosons mediate the interactions of the weak force (Electroweak theory). The Higgs field gives subatomic particles mass

Buzzword fallacies.

​

You can't laugh your way out of your illiteracy, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

It shows the evolution of the universe from the B.B. to today.

No, it shows a religion.

 

[Into the Night]

It shows the evolution of the universe from the B.B. to today.
And it is not an explosion. No physicist describes it that way.

The Big Bang is not a theory of science, Sock.

 

[BidenPresident]

No, it shows a religion.

you are a very stupid jerkoff

 

[Into the Night]

Think of it as a single house wiring diagram. You want to keep it as simple as possible. Tweakers won't understand the full picture. The multiverse has numerous big bangs yet science only focuses on one.

There is no such thing as a multiverse in a universe. Paradox.

 

[BidenPresident]

The Big Bang is not a theory of science, Sock.

you are a very stupid jerkoff

 

[Into the Night]

You shouldn't have asked the question if you thought the answer would humiliate you and make you angry

​

You're hallucinating again, Sock...and you can't laugh your way out of your illiteracy.

 

[BidenPresident]

The Big Bang is not a theory of science, Sock.

you are a very stupid asshole

 

[Into the Night]

you are a very stupid jerkoff

A typical fundamentalist type comment. You cannot make religion a science, Sock.

 

[BidenPresident]

A typical fundamentalist type comment. You cannot make religion a science, Sock.

you are a very stupid jerkoff

 

[Kafka]

Responding to gfm is not responding to me either, Sock.

OK, IBDaMann. I'll try to keep it all straight among you three single beings.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

[h=1]The greatest success story in physics

[/h]
Interesting chart, but how does it pertain to laxatives?

 

[Into the Night]

OK, IBDaMann. I'll try to keep it all straight among you three single beings.

You obviously can't. Sucks to be you, Sock.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Seems to me they wanted to emphasize time, which is unidirectional. The focus of the carton is the evolution of the universe through time. They attempted to represent the 3-d spatial expansion of the universe through time by graphically implying a third dimension, projected into and out of the two dimensional plane of the cartoon.

It makes a difference in where the big bang took place in relation to the whole of the universe. That is, as shown, it occurred at one margin of it and the universe expanded away 'shotgun' style from it. If it occurred in the middle of the universe and everything expanded away from it in every direction, then where is that center in relation to the whole?

It makes a big difference.

 

[Kafka]

You obviously can't. Sucks to be you, Sock.

So sorry, gfm! I keep mixing you all up. Maybe if you tried posting in DIFFERENT STYLES, huh? That might make it easier on me.

 

[Cypress]

You would have to be an active consumer of science journalism to grasp it.

The gauge bosons shown in all graphical illustrations of the Standard Model are the force carriers that mediate the interactions between forces, fields, and particles. The photon mediates the electromagnetic force (quantum electrodynamics), the gluon mediates the strong nuclear interactions with particles (quantum chromodynamics), and the W+, W-, and Z bosons mediate the interactions of the weak force (Electroweak theory). The Higgs field gives subatomic particles mass

Nope. No photons "mediate" anything.

"Electromagnetism in general is mediated by photons. This is a quantum phenomenon " (source: University of Illinois Physics Department)

Nope. Higgs boson does NOT account for mass.

Higgs boson: "The existence of this mass-giving field was confirmed in 2012, when the Higgs boson particle was discovered at CERN." (source: European Center for Nuclear Research - CERN)

 

[Kafka]

I have a question... Why does this model show the 'Big Bang' as being mono-directional? The explosion of anything is far more random and omni-directional. That seems to me to present a problem...

Nope, it's a simplification/representation. It's not like the big bang resulted in one giant jet off to the "side" as there was no "direction", there was no "side", there was no "up", no "down", not even a "when".

This is a way to represent a concept.