The greatest success story in physics

[Into the Night]

He obviously had never heard of it, but decided to spew verbal diarrhea all over the thread anyway.

Large Hadron Collider is famous for the Higgs boson, but I think most of the grunt work that went into developing the Standard Model occurred at Fermilab, Stanford Linear Accelerator, Brookhaven National Lab

There is no such thing as a Standard Model, Sock. There is no 'grunt work' for any such thing.

 

[IBDaMann]

It was IBD's continuous denial of the Standard Model that got me riled up.

Excuse me ... you still haven't defined what you mean by the "standard model." How do you get "riled up" over something you don't understand well enough to specify?

I would point out that you are still batting 1.000 for not knowing anything about the topic of the thread in which you are posting. Now you are claiming that you get "riled up" about that which you do not know.

Brilliant.

 

[Cypress]

Nobel prize-winning physicist Peter Higgs, who proposed the existence of the so-called "God particle" that helped explain how matter formed after the Big Bang, has died at age 94, the University of Edinburgh said Tuesday.

Higgs predicted the existence of a new particle — the so-called Higgs boson — in 1964. But it would be almost 50 years before the particle's existence could be confirmed. Higgs' theory related to how subatomic particles that are the building blocks of matter get their mass.

This theoretical understanding is a central part of the so-called Standard Model, which describes the physics of how the world is constructed.

What do you mean by "the standard model"?

​

There is no such thing as a 'standard model'.

​

 

[IBDaMann]

Nobel prize-winning physicist Peter Higgs,

This means that Peter Higgs was a leftist. The Nobel board awards the Nobel prize for leftist political activism, although the award is steeped in dishonesty and is always presented under some alternative pretense, e.g. physics, peace, economics, etc... and is absolutely not awarded for merit lest a conservative be somehow recognized.

The real reason Peter Higgs received his Nobel award was his lifelong antinuclear activism and membership in Greenpeace. The pretense for the Nobel recognition, however, was his claim of a particle.
The real reason for Barack Obama's Nobel award was getting elected President. The pretense was the peace that he brought to the planet.
The real reason Al Gore received the Nobel prize was his Marxism and his ardent advocacy for Global Warming. The pretense was ... well, Marxism and preaching Global Warming is enough.

I think Peter Higgs' wife, Jody, should have shared in the Nobel award equally, as she was also an antinuclear activist and also made no contributions to science.

... who proposed the existence of the so-called "God particle" that helped explain how matter formed after the Big Bang,

What technology has been developed because of Higgs proposal? Nothing? It doesn't sound like much of a proposal now does it?

Higgs predicted the existence of a new particle

So far, there is no reason any rational adult should believe that such a flake of a particle actually exists.

But it would be almost 50 years before the particle's existence could be confirmed.

It was never confirmed. Learn what science is.

Higgs' theory related to how subatomic particles that are the building blocks of matter get their mass.

Atoms are the building block of matter. Learn chemistry. No engineer has ever used the Higgs boson to develop any technology.

This theoretical understanding is a central part of the so-called Standard Model,

... which isn't science and isn't even a model. At least you have goat's comforting shoulder on which to cry.

... which describes the physics of how the world is constructed.

Your artwork doesn't describe anything.

 

[Cypress]

He never even heard of the Standard Model before masturbating over my posts

This means that Peter Higgs was a leftist. The Nobel board awards the Nobel prize for leftist political activism, although the award is steeped in dishonesty and is always presented under some alternative pretense, e.g. physics, peace, economics, etc... and is absolutely not awarded for merit lest a conservative be somehow recognized.

The real reason Peter Higgs received his Nobel award was his lifelong antinuclear activism and membership in Greenpeace. The pretense for the Nobel recognition, however, was his claim of a particle.
The real reason for Barack Obama's Nobel award was getting elected President. The pretense was the peace that he brought to the planet.
The real reason Al Gore received the Nobel prize was his Marxism and his ardent advocacy for Global Warming. The pretense was ... well, Marxism and preaching Global Warming is enough.

I think Peter Higgs' wife, Jody, should have shared in the Nobel award equally, as she was also an antinuclear activist and also made no contributions to science.


What technology has been developed because of Higgs proposal? Nothing? It doesn't sound like much of a proposal now does it?


So far, there is no reason any rational adult should believe that such a flake of a particle actually exists.


It was never confirmed. Learn what science is.


Atoms are the building block of matter. Learn chemistry. No engineer has ever used the Higgs boson to develop any technology.


... which isn't science and isn't even a model. At least you have goat's comforting shoulder on which to cry.


Your artwork doesn't describe anything.

Still eagerly following and masturbating over my thread two weeks later

There is no such thing as a 'standard model' (of particle physics).

​

What do you mean by "the standard model"?

​

Darwin's theory of evolution is not science

​

hint: energy and matter are not interchangeable

​

Wave-Particle duality is classical physics.

​

There is no such thing as an accelerating reference frame!!

​

What do you mean by "the standard model"?

​

science doesn't explain anything about nature!

​

 

[Into the Night]

Nobel prize-winning physicist Peter Higgs, who proposed the existence of the so-called "God particle" that helped explain how matter formed after the Big Bang, has died at age 94, the University of Edinburgh said Tuesday.

Higgs predicted the existence of a new particle — the so-called Higgs boson — in 1964. But it would be almost 50 years before the particle's existence could be confirmed. Higgs' theory related to how subatomic particles that are the building blocks of matter get their mass.

This theoretical understanding is a central part of the so-called Standard Model, which describes the physics of how the world is constructed.

​

There is no such thing as a 'standard model'. Buzzword fallacy. You can't laugh your way out of your illiteracy, Sock.

 

[Kafka]

There is no such thing as a 'standard model'. Buzzword fallacy. You can't laugh your way out of your illiteracy, Sock.

Seriously, dude, why do you say shit like this? There IS such a thing as the Standard Model. You can literally stumble into any regular bookstore and pick up a book about it. ANYONE can do this (assuming they can read).

So why DENY it like people just made up the phrase? This is honestly the most puzzling thing about your endlessly stupid and brain-numbing posts.

Can you explain the game to us so that we might find it as entertaining as you seemingly do?

 

[Cypress]

You can lead a horse to water, but....

There is no such thing as a 'standard model'! Buzzword fallacy.

"The Standard Model: the most successful theory ever" (source: Fermilab, America's premier high energy physics laboratory)

There is no such thing as a 'standard model' (of particle physics).

​

What do you mean by "the standard model"?

 

[IBDaMann]

Seriously, dude, why do you say shit like this? There IS such a thing as the Standard Model.

One by one, the chain of scientifically illiterate morons steps up to vomit out assurances that they are thuper-thmart thienth geniutheth ... and that those who know so much more than they do must be the ones who are stupid.

Every single moron who has declared that there is such a "standard model" (that is somehow not classical physics and chemistry) ends up fleeing to the hills in a frightened panic with his tail between his legs when asked to provide this "standard science model" and to 1. explain how it somehow predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry do not, and 2. identify technologies developed using said "model."

Are you ready, Mithter Geniuth?

Please provide this "standard science model" and 1. explain how it somehow predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry do not, and 2. identify technologies developed using said "model" ...

... without fleeing to the hills, of course.

I can see that you aren't planning on making any lame excuses because apparently you can literally stumble into any regular bookstore and pick up a book about it. ANYONE can do this (assuming you can read), right?

So why not just get to it and kill this issue dead in the water?

 

[IBDaMann]

"The Standard Model: the most successful theory ever" (source: Fermilab, America's premier high energy physics laboratory)

Too funny! Cypress thinks science is an opinion.

Too funny! Cypress thinks a laboratory can have an opinion.

 

[Kafka]

One by one, the chain of scientifically illiterate morons steps up to vomit out assurances that they are thuper-thmart thienth geniutheth ... and that those who know so much more than they do must be the ones who are stupid.

Every single moron who has declared that there is such a "standard model" (that is somehow not classical physics and chemistry) ends up fleeing to the hills in a frightened panic with his tail between his legs when asked to provide this "standard science model" and to 1. explain how it somehow predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry do not, and 2. identify technologies developed using said "model."

Are you ready, Mithter Geniuth?

Please provide this "standard science model" and 1. explain how it somehow predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry do not, and 2. identify technologies developed using said "model" ...

... without fleeing to the hills, of course.

I can see that you aren't planning on making any lame excuses because apparently you can literally stumble into any regular bookstore and pick up a book about it. ANYONE can do this (assuming you can read), right?

So why not just get to it and kill this issue dead in the water?

Sorry Into the Night, I have little interest in discussing stuff with you that you will just deny simply because that is what you find "entertaining".

 

[IBDaMann]

Sorry Into the Night, [ baaamm! ... he flees to the hills with his tail between his legs]

Cough, cough ... I thought you might have been throwing up a smokescreen, but it was just your cloud of dust from rushing to escape. We should check to see if you broke a land speed record.

Anyway, your king is tipped. Let me know when you want to play again.

M O R O N

 

[Kafka]

Cough, cough ... I thought you might have been throwing up a smokescreen, but it was just your cloud of dust from rushing to escape. We should check to see if you broke a land speed record.

Anyway, your king is tipped. Let me know when you want to play again.

M O R O N

It must be fun to be so stupid that you can be entertained by the most stupid shit. Life must be an adventure just doing simple things.

 

[BidenPresident]

It must be fun to be so stupid that you can be entertained by the most stupid shit. Life must be an adventure just doing simple things.

Yes. IBDamann is very stupid and thinks he is amusing.

 

[IBDaMann]

It must be fun to be so stupid that you can be entertained by the most stupid shit.

You would know, and I'll take you on your word.

Life must be an adventure just doing simple things.

I wouldn't know. I don't do simple things. I leave the simple things for simple people.

One of those simple things that I left for you is to identify some ways the "standard science model" predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry cannot. It must be fun to be so stupid that you can't support the very insistence you made moments earlier.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes. IBDamann is very stupid and thinks he is amusing.

BidenPresident's intelligence is taxed at "fuck you" and "you should be murdered." He thinks that wins any argument.

 

[Kafka]

You would know, and I'll take you on your word.


I wouldn't know. I don't do simple things. I leave the simple things for simple people.

One of those simple things that I left for you is to identify some ways the "standard science model" predicts nature such that classical physics and chemistry cannot. It must be fun to be so stupid that you can't support the very insistence you made moments earlier.

Ya know, IBDAMAN-INTO THE NIGHT-GFM: you really bore me. Honestly when I see you've replied to my posts I immediately think "Well, there's going to be a pile of shit on the screen now" and I'm never disappointed.

Would you be able to be honest just one time and let me know why you think your posting style is "interesting" or why it entertains you to waste your own time posting shit? Seriously. You never post anything of any real value (you at least are MARGINALLY better than when you post as Into the Night), but honestly why you waste so much time and three "identities" (that are obvious but there may be more) is beyond what a functional adult would do.

WHY DOES THIS ENTERTAIN YOU? TO look like a fool every single time you post? To be the butt of jokes? Do you LIKE being mocked?

 

[IBDaMann]

Ya know, IBDAMAN-INTO THE NIGHT-GFM: you really bore me.

Color me surprised. I can't imagine you ever being interested in anything intellectual.

Honestly when I see you've replied to my posts I immediately think "Well, there's going to be a pile of shit on the screen now" and I'm never disappointed.

I really wish I were capable of dumbing it down sufficiently so that you can understand what I'm writing, but how does one convey a concept to, say, an earthworm?

Would you be able to be honest just one time and let me know why you think your posting style is "interesting"

I fully acknowledge your inability to hold interest in anything above "My car makes me go."

You never post anything of any real value

... but then again, you aren't capable of making any such assessment. Any and all value I add flies right over your head, as you acknowledge here. You admit that you cannot discern any of the value of my posts. You cannot even discern that the problem is on your end. I'm not sure how you expect me to help you with that. You readily admit that you cannot even distinguish between different people.

Don't worry, you're not as bad as Doc Dutch, who only has a brain stem with which to work. You, in contrast, are capable of so much more. For example, you don't need to have someone read posts to you, or at least I'm guessing that you don't.

but honestly why you waste so much time and three "identities" (that are obvious but there may be more) is beyond what a functional adult would do.

Have you ever thought about getting help with this? If you check, you might be able to discern that only the internet's stupidest posters have your affliction.

By the way, if you imagine that I am somehow offended/insulted by your perception that I am either gfm7175 or Into the Night, then you are mistaken. They both have admirable qualities that make your inability to distinguish amount to a compliment to me. Feel free to continue. I'll thank you in advance.

 

[Into the Night]

Seriously, dude, why do you say shit like this? There IS such a thing as the Standard Model.

There is no such thing as a Standard Model in science, Sock. The phrase is only a religious artifact, a buzzword, and meaningless.

You can literally stumble into any regular bookstore and pick up a book about it. ANYONE can do this (assuming they can read).

Science isn't a book, Sock.

So why DENY it like people just made up the phrase?

People made up the phrase. It is not science.

This is honestly the most puzzling thing about your endlessly stupid and brain-numbing posts.

Insults won't work, Sock. The 'Standard Model' is a religious chant, just like 'Climate Change', the 'Big Bang'. NONE of it is science.

Can you explain the game to us so that we might find it as entertaining as you seemingly do?

It's your game you are playing. Now you find it not entertaining anymore because someone is pointing out the science you DO ignore, and the religious chants you call 'sCiEnCe'?

 

[Into the Night]

"The Standard Model: the most successful theory ever" (source: Fermilab, America's premier high energy physics laboratory)

Not a theory, Sock. A buzzword.