PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
The Greatness Of A Country Is Not Derived From The Richest. It Is From The Combination Of All Her People Together.
This is a fundamental difference in conservative and liberal thinking.
Conservatives tend to be exclusive; while liberals are inclusive.
Conservatives are selective. Liberals want a nation that works for everybody.
Conservatives want people to be able to use all the benefits and advantages of society to create their own wealth, but they don't want to owe society any payment in return for that.
Conservatives want to extract wealth from the economy, but they don't want to return any wealth TO the economy.
If the economy is like a garden that you nurture and work in return for the bounty, conservatives want to take produce from the garden, but they don't want to water it or tend it.
Conservatives seem to have this belief that the garden just grows naturally, sort of like the Garden of Eden, and they should be free to endlessly pick the fruit with no concern for how it got there in the first place. When the fruit is gone, capitalism goes off in search of more gardens, leaving devastation and nothingness behind. Like Detroit.
They figure they worked for it - because they figured out how to extract wealth for themselves. Their misconception is that they think the busywork of extracting wealth is 'doing their fair share,' without regard for whether or not their 'work' makes any meaningful or sustainable contribution to society.
The liberal mindset views the greatness of a nation as what that nation does to make sure all the people in the nation have a minimal modicum of basic modern comforts. It's not how rich the rich are. It is how well a nation cares for her most disadvantaged. Making sure EVERYONE is taken care of. THAT is what makes a nation great. Any two-bit despot country can be corrupt enough to have a select few live in luxury and power. A truly powerful and great country has EVERYONE living in comfort and with needs met. If some who excel have more, that's fine. But it shouldn't come at the expense of those who have the least, going without basics.
This is a fundamental difference in conservative and liberal thinking.
Conservatives tend to be exclusive; while liberals are inclusive.
Conservatives are selective. Liberals want a nation that works for everybody.
Conservatives want people to be able to use all the benefits and advantages of society to create their own wealth, but they don't want to owe society any payment in return for that.
Conservatives want to extract wealth from the economy, but they don't want to return any wealth TO the economy.
If the economy is like a garden that you nurture and work in return for the bounty, conservatives want to take produce from the garden, but they don't want to water it or tend it.
Conservatives seem to have this belief that the garden just grows naturally, sort of like the Garden of Eden, and they should be free to endlessly pick the fruit with no concern for how it got there in the first place. When the fruit is gone, capitalism goes off in search of more gardens, leaving devastation and nothingness behind. Like Detroit.
They figure they worked for it - because they figured out how to extract wealth for themselves. Their misconception is that they think the busywork of extracting wealth is 'doing their fair share,' without regard for whether or not their 'work' makes any meaningful or sustainable contribution to society.
The liberal mindset views the greatness of a nation as what that nation does to make sure all the people in the nation have a minimal modicum of basic modern comforts. It's not how rich the rich are. It is how well a nation cares for her most disadvantaged. Making sure EVERYONE is taken care of. THAT is what makes a nation great. Any two-bit despot country can be corrupt enough to have a select few live in luxury and power. A truly powerful and great country has EVERYONE living in comfort and with needs met. If some who excel have more, that's fine. But it shouldn't come at the expense of those who have the least, going without basics.