The Gun debate renewed

How do you know until you try it? Same argument was used against enforcing vehicle seat belts and we all see how that turned out

Actually, we DO know it because we HAVE tried it, and so have other countries. The results are the same, every time. Stricter laws, fewer deaths.
 
Not true, speech is regulated, and the First Amendment hasn’t been deleted, and please, spare us the cherry picked quotes from the Founding Fathers you got off of some NRA website

cherry picked?

you obviously have no idea what the expression means.
 
Let's say it a different way, since you seem to be intellectually challenged. The ten deadliest mass shootings in US history involved assault style weapons. All ten. Does that help you at all?

ROFL..........you got caught lying out your ass, yet i'm the intellectually challenged one????? and you think simply revising your statement absolves you????????
 
Nope. With over 20,000 gun laws on the books, what new law(s) will stop these idiots?

Maybe a little teaching in schools of respect and responsibility instead of teaching them they can chose their gender?

The gun laws on the books suck, nearly anyone in the US can get a gun if they want one, you can even arrange to get one on the regular Internet, it’s a joke without Federal laws
 
ROFL..........you got caught lying out your ass, yet i'm the intellectually challenged one????? and you think simply revising your statement absolves you????????

No, I got caught using hyperbole. So what? It does not change the argument in any meaningful way, but if you want to prance about a scream 'Gotcha' please be my guest. I don't think absolution is required to post here, but thanks for asking.
 
Let's say it a different way, since you seem to be intellectually challenged. The ten deadliest mass shootings in US history involved assault style weapons. All ten. Does that help you at all?

what assault style weapons were used in virginia tech, again?

what assault style weaons were used in the killeen Lubys restaurant??????

hint: they were HANDGUNS!!!!!!!!!!!!

looks like you got caught lying again, or you just never know what the fuck you're ever talking about.
 
translation is that you dont' give a fuck about shall not be infringed, so you don't give a fuck about the constitution. got it.



the founders believed otherwise, making YOU wrong. Even the government knows you have the right to own machine guns.

https://www.groundzerobooksltd.com/...pring-1995-a-second-amendment-symposium-issue

Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2023/03/go...-is-a-right-to-own-machineguns/#ixzz7yaxJRXKL
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Irrefutable evidence that the government knew when proposing the National Firearms Act that a ban on machineguns would be unconstitutional is presented in the Tennessee Law Review, Volume 62, Number 3, Spring 1995; A Second Amendment Symposium Issue:



the spineless fucking cowards are freedom haters such as yourself.

There he goes again with his NRA quotes, no matter how many times it is explained to him, he always returns to the NRA quotes, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it. …………..
 
The gun laws on the books suck, nearly anyone in the US can get a gun if they want one, you can even arrange to get one on the regular Internet, it’s a joke without Federal laws
You have to have it shipped to a licenses firearms dealer and be subjected to a Federal background check.
 
No, I got caught using hyperbole. So what? It does not change the argument in any meaningful way, but if you want to prance about a scream 'Gotcha' please be my guest. I don't think absolution is required to post here, but thanks for asking.

no amount of sidestepping or deflection will change the fact that you lied, or just didn't know what you were talking about. hyperbole is a lame excuse, but I get that you liberals have no other way to make an argument.
 
The gun laws on the books suck, nearly anyone in the US can get a gun if they want one, you can even arrange to get one on the regular Internet, it’s a joke without Federal laws

Correct, a patchwork of local and state laws is defeated relatively easily. But at least it does have some impact, and if expanded, the impact would be greater. But the truth is, the gun freaks here believe their absolute right to own a weapon that disintegrates flesh and kills as fast as possible trumps anyone elese rights. It is what it is. They don't care about the laws because they don't WANT the laws.
 
no amount of sidestepping or deflection will change the fact that you lied, or just didn't know what you were talking about. hyperbole is a lame excuse, but I get that you liberals have no other way to make an argument.

Your attempted change of the subject is just more evidence that you are losing. Badly.

I DID know what I was talking about. The point was and remains that assault weapons are the weapon of choice for school shootings, or pretty much any shooting in which the shooter wants to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible. Period. Full stop.
 
There he goes again with his NRA quotes, no matter how many times it is explained to him, he always returns to the NRA quotes, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it. …………..

no matter how many times you try to debunk the truth as 'NRA' quotes, nothing will change the fact that they are actual quotes and intentions from the founding fathers.

would you like court cases that ALSO clearly discuss individual rights to keep and bear arms?????
 
Wow, maybe the stupidest fucking response to a post in history. You fucking idiots now pigeonhole EVERTYTHING into your irrational and ignoarant fear of LGBTQ people.

If someone told you it was raining, you would reply 'It's the fucking trannnies'.

I just showed you objective proof that tougher gun laws equate to lower gun death rates, and your response is 'FUCK THE TRANSVESTITES'

LOL, you need to just quit. You are a featherweight.
what a fucking retard we have here

So if we can prove a dictatorship is the safest form of government, we just have to go that route because of stats

derp derp concart. derp derp
 
what assault style weapons were used in virginia tech, again?

what assault style weaons were used in the killeen Lubys restaurant??????

hint: they were HANDGUNS!!!!!!!!!!!!

looks like you got caught lying again, or you just never know what the fuck you're ever talking about.

Perhaps you should reread my post. Ooops.
 
I read the constitution just fine. It's you that needs government tyrants to explain it to you for their own evil freedom hating purposes, traitorous moron.

Oh really, show us in the Constitution where it says Congress can create an Air Force, print paper money or regulate immigration. Where would one find the right of privacy, to travel, innocent till proven guilty, executive privilege, or even God, just to mention a few

What you know about the Constitution is what the NRA propaganda tells you about the Constitution, of which you accept blindly as factual, and little else
 
Correct, a patchwork of local and state laws is defeated relatively easily. But at least it does have some impact, and if expanded, the impact would be greater. But the truth is, the gun freaks here believe their absolute right to own a weapon that disintegrates flesh and kills as fast as possible trumps anyone elese rights. It is what it is. They don't care about the laws because they don't WANT the laws.
Chicago has some of the strongest gun laws in the country and some of the worst gun violence in the country.
 
Heart disease is the number one cause of death in America

Americans are very fat

According to our resident authoritarians, that alone should be all we need to start removing individual freedoms.
 
Back
Top