The Gun debate renewed

Wow, maybe the stupidest fucking response to a post in history. You fucking idiots now pigeonhole EVERTYTHING into your irrational and ignoarant fear of LGBTQ people.
We take a short break to discuss the Church of Perversion:

The Church of Perversion is a fundamentalist style religion pushed by Democrats. It encourages all manner of sexual perversions, self mutilation (even of children!) in the name of 'gender equality' (whatever the fuck THAT means!), and encourages spreading of many serious diseases such as syphilis, gonorrhea, AIDS, chlamydia, hepatitis B, trichomoniasis. herpes, papillomavirus, and others.
If someone told you it was raining, you would reply 'It's the fucking trannnies'.
Perhaps you are unfamiliar with the term 'golden rain' and where it comes from. Another practice from the Church of Perversions.
I just showed you objective proof that tougher gun laws equate to lower gun death rates,
Argument from randU fallacy. False authority fallacy. Data War.
and your response is 'FUCK THE TRANSVESTITES'
No thanks. RB60 never suggested such an activity either. Quite the opposite, actually.
LOL, you need to just quit. You are a featherweight.
Assumption of victory fallacy. Attempted proof by randU.

We now return you to the regular topic of this thread on the Church of Hoplophobia.
 
How will more gun laws stop these asshole mass shooters?

Answer the question, you illiterate fuckwit?

He can't, because he knows the answer that it's not possible.
He also supports leftists that implement 'gun free zones', which allow these psychopaths to continue shooting with little to challenge them (like somebody shooting back!).
He also supports these same leftists that created these psychopaths in the first place through psychoquackery with drugs, or depressive states induced by self mutilation.
 
Absolutely correct... throw in social media , video games, and zero Parental Guidance and you've got multiple reasons that the problem is out of control...

Social media does not kill or shoot any gun.
Video games do not kill or shoot any gun (outside the video game). This so-called 'correlation' was debunked decades ago.
Democrats don't want parental guidance. They want the government to raise and indoctrinate children.
 
Heller. Checkmate. Have a nice day, loser.

A copy of the Heller decision can be found here.

The Heller decision is not the Constitution of the United States. The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution of the United States. It has no authority to interpret the Constitution of the United States. It has no authority to override the constitution of any State.

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon, including any gun.
 
means nothing. we already know you are fine with whatever court negates parts of the constitution you don't like. but, please keep moving forward with your anti constitutional bullshit. you'll end up regretting it.

I do not want civil war. You are right, though. I see no way of avoiding it now.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, the Democrats are going to go ape and there will be war.
If Trump loses the 2024 election, the Democrats will implement full tyranny and there will be war.
If the election of 2024 faults again, there will be war, since faith in the election system will be totally destroyed.
 
Nope. I HATE the Heller decision but I respect it. MY reading of the Constitution says that the right to bear arms applies only to regulated militias. So, you have yours, I have mine, and neither one means jack shit.

If banning machine guns was unconstitutional, how come they are banned? Must just suck to be you.

No, you cannot just change the 2nd amendment to destroy it.

Machine guns are not banned.
Owning a tank is not banned.
Owning a Howitzer is not banned.
Manufacturing your own cannon that can shoot a projectile six miles is not banned.
Manufacturing your own explosives is not banned.

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon, including any type of gun.

The Supreme court does not have authority to change or interpret the Constitution. See Article III of the Constitution of the United States.
No part of government has authority to change or interpret the Constitution of the United States, other than the States themselves, using the procedures outlined in that Constitution.

The 2nd amendment has not been repealed.

Further, the right to self defense is inherent. That includes the right of self defense with any weapon at your disposal. NO government can take that away, no matter how oppressive.
 
No, you didn't read that either, but I was referring to my objective proof of stricter gun laws correlating to lower gun death rates. Now, you probably don't give a shit, because you believe your rights trump anyone else's, but fortunately, you are completely feckless. Your nutters tried to overthrow the government, but you got sidetracked shitting in the Capitol and stealing shit. Maybe focus a little better next time, okay sparky?

Attempted proof by circular (fundamentalism). Attempted proof by randU. False authority fallacy. Buzzword fallacy ('objective proof'). Inversion fallacy. Gaslighting.
 
No, they are doing so with the consent of the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Don't like it? GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY COUNTRY, TRAITOR.

The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution. It is not your country. Omniscience fallacy. Buzzword fallacy ('traitor'). Fiction. Machine guns are not banned.
 
I didn't say that.
Blatant lie. Denial of self argument (paradox).
When you have to lie about what someone said, you have lost.
Inversion fallacy.
Which of course makes sense, because you are a loser. Losers lose. That's what they do. Keep up the good work.
Inversion fallacy.
I posted a link, but there were no pictures, so I get why you didn't understand it. Oh well.
False authority fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon.
 
So with that logic, then the right would be the party of school and mass shootings,
Inversion fallacy. It is DEMOCRATS that create the psychotics that like to shoot up schools. It is DEMOCRATS that create the 'gun free zones' so that these psychotics can conduct a mass shooting with little to stop them.
the rural poor plus trailer parks,
It is DEMOCRATS that turned the cities these trailer parks are in into cesspools. The city is not 'rural'.
and last I looked, it was the Jimmy Jordan’s and Trump who were talking about defunding police
It is DEMOCRATS that defund police and military. It is DEMOCRATS that fund and support violent factions like Antifa, BLM, and the KKK.
The sheriff is wrong, if he were honest, he’d admit acquiring a gun in the US is easy, the laws suck, and are not nationwide
The Constitution of the United States is the national constitution. It's effects are nationwide. ALL States MUST conform to the 2nd amendment.
The sheriff DID say acquiring a gun in the US is easy.

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit any weapon, including any gun.
 
Correct, a patchwork of local and state laws is defeated relatively easily. But at least it does have some impact, and if expanded, the impact would be greater. But the truth is, the gun freaks here believe their absolute right to own a weapon that disintegrates flesh and kills as fast as possible trumps anyone elese rights. It is what it is. They don't care about the laws because they don't WANT the laws.

Isn't it already against the law to shoot innocent people? Apparently violent criminals don't care if they are breaking that law. What's breaking another gun law going to matter?
 
Isn't it already against the law to shoot innocent people? Apparently violent criminals don't care if they are breaking that law. What's breaking another gun law going to matter?

Exactly. Look at the 1/6 criminals violently attacking police, vandalizing Congress and disrupting legal proceedings. Laws didn't stop them. Laws only work if enforced....which is why a lot of the 1/6ers were convicted and imprisoned.
 
7hzrd0-jpg.1252941
 
Back
Top