No, what I said is I am an expert, you didn't say an expert at what. Now we find, you want an expert in alternative energy who says that alternative energy doesn't stand a chance, and that is quite an impossible task. Show me an "expert" in any field, who claims his field doesn't have a chance, and I'll show you someone who is beyond pinheaded.
I am an expert in commercial capitalism, and as such, I can say that alternative energy doesn't stand a chance. I also told you why! Pinheads are in charge of it! Now, one of two things could happen (they won't)... Pinheads could suddenly discover capitalism, or alternative energy could be turned over to capitalists. Under either scenario, alternative energy would have a chance, but currently, it has no chance. That's my expert opinion.
I do know what "more efficient" means, and I explained correctly, that "more efficient" only means "more expensive." That is the case with solar cells, ask any solar cell expert! I never said anything about "we'll charge more for production" and have no idea where you derived that from my comments. It simply costs more to make solar cells more efficient.
I also told you why Germans removed subsidies, and ironically, it supports my expert opinion on why alternative energy doesn't stand a chance! Pinhead environmentalist liberals don't understand or believe in capitalism! I have said before, I am all for alternative energy... bring it on! Let's do it! If you will allow capitalism and free markets to prevail, I think it may stand a chance in a few decades. What I am not for, is forking over a few trillion tax dollars for Berkley to do feasibility studies of how much money would be saved if we converted the entire west coast to windmill power. That's the kind of shit liberal environmentalist pinheads want to do, and it is counterproductive.