The left should chill

This is basically a "fuck you" parting shot. Would you accept that as a concession if your guy had won?

Until I get a real concession- devoid of the insults and false accusations- I'm going to continue to ridicule you.

There is nothing inaccurate about what I said. I don't have to like Trump as a person. Many still won't; I'd wager that the majority of Americans still won't.

But I'm willing to give him a chance. I don't care what you think a "real concession" is. This isn't a "concession" thread. Only Hillary has to concede, and she did.
 
Actually you made several inaccuracies. Let's start with this one: "he clearly does have issues with women." It's your claim, loser, so prove it.

LOL

You don't think he has any issues with women? The derogatory namecalling, the bragging about sexual assault, Megyn Kelly, judging women on a scale of 1-10, et al.

Trump is a sad man when it comes to women. What I said is completely, 100% accurate and indisputable.
 
Delegitimization is important to sapping his political capitol. We will give trump Washington DC, Trump will give us America.

how much of this do you consider 'America'?
map-of-counties-50-of-pop..jpg
 
LOL

You don't think he has any issues with women? The derogatory namecalling, the bragging about sexual assault, Megyn Kelly, judging women on a scale of 1-10, et al.

Trump is a sad man when it comes to women. What I said is completely, 100% accurate and indisputable.

That can be used to describe about 95% of men.

Tell me now, which candidate hired a woman for his campaign manager? Which one has the most women in high powered positions within his employment?
 
LOL

You don't think he has any issues with women? The derogatory namecalling, the bragging about sexual assault, Megyn Kelly, judging women on a scale of 1-10, et al.

Trump is a sad man when it comes to women. What I said is completely, 100% accurate and indisputable.

Trump the misogynist that appoints a woman campaign director because she was better than any of the available men lol?

Let's see you square that circle.
 
Are you guys serious? He even said in an interview "I can't say that either" when asked if he treats women w/ respect.

He can't hire in 2016 according to his lack of respect for them, but the lack of respect is clear as day. I'm sorry you guys can't see it. Almost everyone else can. This is an issue Trump has - deal with it.
 
Are you guys serious? He even said in an interview "I can't say that either" when asked if he treats women w/ respect.

Just as I thought- you're source of information is directly from a Hillary campaign commercial, and out of context.

You used to be a decent debater. What happened?
 
Just as I thought- you're source of information is directly from a Hillary campaign commercial, and out of context.

You used to be a decent debater. What happened?

You should choose a debate you can win. It's not even disputable that Trump has issues w/ women. He responded to a question about his negative views on women by suggesting that the woman interviewing him was menstruating.

95% of the men that I know do not speak about women w/ such derision.
 
You should choose a debate you can win. It's not even disputable that Trump has issues w/ women. He responded to a question about his negative views on women by suggesting that the woman interviewing him was menstruating.

95% of the men that I know do not speak about women w/ such derision.

See what I mean? Claiming that something is "not even disputable" is a fail debate tactic. So is claiming a statement made by your opposition was meant to be taken how you falsely interpreted it, or your just parroting the Hillary campaign again.

I must say how disappointed I am.
 
Are you guys serious? He even said in an interview "I can't say that either" when asked if he treats women w/ respect.

He can't hire in 2016 according to his lack of respect for them, but the lack of respect is clear as day. I'm sorry you guys can't see it. Almost everyone else can. This is an issue Trump has - deal with it.

I think a lot of people, including women, didn't see it.
 
See what I mean? Claiming that something is "not even disputable" is a fail debate tactic. So is claiming a statement made by your opposition was meant to be taken how you falsely interpreted it, or your just parroting the Hillary campaign again.

I must say how disappointed I am.

This was a thread of goodwill. I'm accepting the Trump Presidency, expressing hope that many on the left can calm down & accept it, and seeking areas of common ground.

You seemed to take issue because I won't take the extra step of actually allowing respect for Trump the person, and overlooking his personal faults. You're just not going to get that out of me. I find him to be pretty revolting as an individual. This isn't a "lefty" thing. There are likely many who voted for him who feel the same way, and we certainly have many comments on record from people on the right expressing similar concerns and criticisms for his personality & temperament.

The guy has issues with women. "IMO," and in the opinion of many on the left & right - I'd wager the majority.

Better?
 
This was a thread of goodwill.
Except that it wasn't, for the reasons that I mentioned in my first post. Now, since I've crushed you in a debate that you started, you want the beating to end. That's not going to happen just because you're trying to walk your statement back now as "your opinion", not fact, especially since you're claiming that it's the opinion of the majority.
 
LOL

You don't think he has any issues with women? The derogatory namecalling, the bragging about sexual assault, Megyn Kelly, judging women on a scale of 1-10, et al.

Trump is a sad man when it comes to women. What I said is completely, 100% accurate and indisputable.

I large part of the female electorate didn't buy into that false narrative. Irony abounds for smug leftists who thought this election was over before it even got started.
 
You should choose a debate you can win. It's not even disputable that Trump has issues w/ women. He responded to a question about his negative views on women by suggesting that the woman interviewing him was menstruating.

95% of the men that I know do not speak about women w/ such derision.

:rofl2:
 
Except that it wasn't, for the reasons that I mentioned in my first post. Now, since I've crushed you in a debate that you started, you want the beating to end. That's not going to happen just because you're trying to walk your statement back now as "your opinion", not fact, especially since you're claiming that it's the opinion of the majority.

I think it's laughable that some can't see he has issues with women.

Would you also deny that he's a narcissist? Let's see how far this goes w/ you.
 
Back
Top