BidenPresident
Verified User
You seem to think a LOT of yourself. There's a bible verse about that. But I'll let you figure out which one it is. Maybe you'll get around to reading the Bible!
Christians are self-righteous. An arrogant lot.
You seem to think a LOT of yourself. There's a bible verse about that. But I'll let you figure out which one it is. Maybe you'll get around to reading the Bible!
I was in the process of doing so, but Q-boy didn't want to play along because his perceived authority was being challenged. He then went into full dipshit mode because he wanted me to lose my patience with him and he succeeded. I'm willing to attempt going through the very same thought exercise with you that he refused to go through. First question (to grasp what your position is on the matter):
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: "The God of the Christian Bible committed murder/genocide according to various Old Testament scriptures." Explain your position.
Ready to continue the thought exercise yet, or are you too afraid it'll expose just how little you know about Christianity?You seem to think a LOT of yourself. There's a bible verse about that. But I'll let you figure out which one it is. Maybe you'll get around to reading the Bible!
Perfect. We have now established your position, that the Christian God committed murder/genocide in various OT scriptures.The God of the Old Testament (who is the God of the Christian Bible) DID indeed commit murder/genocide according to all of the translations of the Old Testament that I have read.
The story of the exit of Hebrews from Egypt in Exodus is preceded by a major example of that...in the Passover story. (The story itself has lots of faults and inconsistencies, but it actually celebrates the murder/genocide committed by the god of the Old Testament.
Yes, I agree that a particular question can be responded to without ever providing an answer to it. Those are two different things.Okay, unless you want to discuss my agreement with the statement you offered, it is my chance to ask a question. If you do want to discuss my agreement...we can do that before we get to my question.
BACKGROUND FOR MY QUESTION:
It is my contention that a response to a question is not always an answer. (An answer to a question is always a response.) If a question like, "What is your favorite color?" were asked, "Red" would be an answer..."I do not have a favorite color" would be a response, but not actually an answer. If a question like, "Do any gods exist?" were asked, "My opinion is that at least one does" is a response, but not actually an answer.
MY QUESTION: Do you agree with my contention that one can respond to a question without actually giving an answer...and that responding to a question and actually giving an answer can be completely different things?
Perfect. We have now established your position, that the Christian God committed murder/genocide in various OT scriptures.
My first question in response to the aforementioned established position is as follows:
According to Christianity (the Bible), who created life?
Please see my post #786. Thanks.Okay...you have a second question coming, but only after you respond to my first question.
So...please respond to that question of mine.
Please see my post #786. Thanks.
According to Christianity (the Bible), who created life?
It’s absurd, there is no addressing absurdity. I’ve seen your idea of debate and I’m not interested in exchanging insults.The leftists' preferred manner of EVASION, i.e. declare the question "stupid" and don't answer it. The question isn't going away. You are simply on record as having tipped your king.
You have never debated any topic with me. If your idea of debate is merely an exchange of insults then I appreciate you not wasting my time.I’ve seen your idea of debate and I’m not interested in exchanging insults.
You have never debated any topic with me. If your idea of debate is merely an exchange of insults then I appreciate you not wasting my time.
By the way, I am enjoying your attempts to characterize your own EVASION and total inability to defend your stupid position as somehow being my fault.
So flee. It's your only option. You have nothing but disappointment in learning that your support for the killing of living humans is indefensible and you get to live with that. Maybe you're the kind of evil person who is perfectly fine with that, but what is certain is that you have no hope of debating it with anybody. You picked a loser position. Now all you can do is blame others for your spinelessness and lack of critical reasoning.
Have a great day.
Ready to continue the thought exercise yet, or are you too afraid it'll expose just how little you know about Christianity?
blah blah blah blah blahAs I said, you overestimate your value to the conversation. You won't answer any questions but you want to play some stupid game which is predicated on you thinking you are somehow superior.
Trust me, you aren't.
Unlike you I've actually had philosophy classes so I know your game and I find it dull. I find YOU dull.
It is already verifiable record on this forum that I have answered your question and have attempted to walk you through a thought exercise to explain to you why you are wrong. You are too scared to face the music that you are not JPP's resident Christianity expert.Perhaps if you would be willing to step down off your pillar and answer my initial question I would be willing to play discussion with you. But you aren't really all that and you aren't worth my actual effort to play YOUR game.
blah blah blah blah blahYou see when you want people to RESPECT YOU you must EARN IT. You have not earned my respect. You dodged a question and that's all I need to know about you.
You think yourself too wise. But if you read the Bible you'd know where that leads. Thankfully for you you haven't a clue.
No worries. I did happen to respond rather quickly that time.Oops, I did not go to that post before replying to the first one.
Okay. Those posts probably would have been better in reverse order, but...
...now I'll respond to your second question.
Another question answered. You're on a roll!According to the Bible, the god of the Old Testament created life. My time as a Christian tells me that Christianity accepts that part of the Old Testament.
My favorite color is yellow.Reserving my right to a second question: If you do have a favorite color...what is it?
No worries. I did happen to respond rather quickly that time.
Another question answered. You're on a roll!
Next question: If God created life (which we have now established as a fact within the context of "according to Christianity"), then does God have authority over life (IOW, authority over what he created)?
My favorite color is yellow.
That would be you.As I said, you overestimate your value to the conversation.
Obvious projection. You won't answer any questions because you are preoccupied with fleeing to the hills.You won't answer any questions but you want to play some stupid game which is predicated on you thinking you are somehow superior.
Who were you imagining would be stupid enough to do that?Trust me,
It might have been value-added if you hadn't slept through them.Unlike you I've actually had philosophy classes
I bet you find everyone smarter than you "dull".so I know your game and I find it dull. I find YOU dull.
The word is "pedestal", not "pillar".Perhaps if you would be willing to step down off your pillar and [go away and just let me pwetend to be the ecthpert fowa widdo' bit]
Did you notice that JPP isn't crawling with adoring fans of yours.You see when you want people to RESPECT YOU you must EARN IT.
I don't think he particularly needs your respect. I don't think anyone particularly needs your respect. What do you have to offer? Philosophy classes through which you slept?You have not earned my respect.
Well then, I suppose "ditto".You dodged a question and that's all I need to know about you.
By "have authority over", I mean "being the sphere of influence over [insert thing here], usually due to bringing about its existence" ... e.g. I don't have authority over your child, as I didn't bring about your child. The federal government doesn't have authority over the States (beyond what authority has been delegated to it by the States), as the federal government didn't bring about the States. Likewise, I don't have authority over the existence of human life, as I didn't bring about its existence.First two question I gave answers. On this question I will give a response...which you can consider an answer or not. We certainly can discuss it to resolve any difficulties you have with the response.
To begin...a comment: I am not sure what you mean by "have authority over life...over what he created."
In Mary Shelly's story, Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein "created" a life. I am not sure what "authority" that gave Dr. Frankenstein over that life. Once created, the life pretty much has authority over itself. Mary Shelly has more "authority" over the life created than Dr. Frankenstein insofar as she could move the piece of fiction in whatever direction she chose.
So I would have to give a very qualified "NO" answer to your question. (Obviously Christianity could have a different take on this.)
Perhaps you could explain what you mean by "authority over" more extensively. In fact, since I have replied to your question, I will make my next question be, "Would you explain in more detail what you mean by "have authority over?"
Thanks. My question was asked just to get the process out of the way. I am more interested in where you are going here. For me, it is an extremely interesting process.
By "have authority over", I mean "being the sphere of influence over [insert thing here], usually due to bringing about its existence" ... e.g. I don't have authority over your child, as I didn't bring about your child. The federal government doesn't have authority over the States (beyond what authority has been delegated to it by the States), as the federal government didn't bring about the States. Likewise, I don't have authority over the existence of human life, as I didn't bring about its existence.
A potter has authority over the pottery that he forms. He forms it in a particular manner according to his own purpose(s) for it.
With that clarification, I ask again: If God created life, then does God have authority over life? (meaning that God is the sphere of influence over life, just as an author is over a book, a husband is over his household, a mayor is over a city, a governor is over a state, a president is over a nation, etc)
Is that it's not aptly named.
A good portion - and I'd say most - of the religion are practices, rituals, rules and philosophies that were never spoken by Christ, or endorsed by Christ.
I think there are some sects that are strictly about the teachings of Christ, who I feel was an ascended being and someone whose words matter, but they're not mainstream Christianity.