State funds vs federal SNAP.The Commonwealth Stabilization (“Rainy Day”) Fund has a balance of $8.165 billion as of June 2, 2025.
![]()
Commonwealth Stabilization (“Rainy Day”) Fund - Office of the Comptroller
These reports detail transfers to and from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Stabilization ("Rainy Day") Fund.www.macomptroller.org
Massachusetts has spent over $2 billion on emergency shelters and migrant support since Gov. Healey took office in 2023, with FY24 at $955 million and FY25 exceeding $940 million. The federal SNAP funding lapse affects $240 million monthly for over 1 million recipients. Roughly 10-12% of that total migrant spending would cover the one-month shortfall, suggesting priorities could shift to prioritize citizens' food security.
@grok
Trump reallocated funds for military housing to pay for his wall. Tapping the contingency funds is easily doable if he so chooses.No, they're not. They are set aside for actual emergencies, not trying to pay your way through a Democrat tantrum on the budget.
| State | SNAP Participation Rate | Political Lean |
|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | ~21% | Blue/Swing |
| Mississippi | ~19% | Red |
| Louisiana | ~18% | Red |
| West Virginia | ~17% | Red |
| Oregon | ~16% | Blue |
| Kentucky | ~15% | Red |
| Alabama | ~14% | Red |
| New York | ~13% | Blue |
| State | SNAP Participation Rate | Political Lean |
|---|---|---|
| New Mexico | ~21% | Blue/Swing |
| Mississippi | ~19% | Red |
| Louisiana | ~18% | Red |
| West Virginia | ~17% | Red |
| Oregon | ~16% | Blue |
| Kentucky | ~15% | Red |
| Alabama | ~14% | Red |
| New York | ~13% | Blue |
Trump should slap a lawsuit on them for lying.
The Commonwealth Stabilization (“Rainy Day”) Fund has a balance of $8.165 billion as of June 2, 2025.
![]()
Commonwealth Stabilization (“Rainy Day”) Fund - Office of the Comptroller
These reports detail transfers to and from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Stabilization ("Rainy Day") Fund.www.macomptroller.org
Massachusetts has spent over $2 billion on emergency shelters and migrant support since Gov. Healey took office in 2023, with FY24 at $955 million and FY25 exceeding $940 million. The federal SNAP funding lapse affects $240 million monthly for over 1 million recipients. Roughly 10-12% of that total migrant spending would cover the one-month shortfall, suggesting priorities could shift to prioritize citizens' food security.
@grok
And the people that live in these same states depend on the federal programs they want the funding cut the most.Do the Red States depend more on SNAP than the blue states?
Stop lying, MAGA.
Yes, many red states show higher per-capita reliance on SNAP (food stamps) than blue states, though the picture is nuanced. States like New Mexico, Mississippi, Louisiana, and West Virginia—often considered red or swing states—have some of the highest participation rates.
Here’s a snapshot of states with the highest percentage of residents receiving SNAP benefits:
SNAP Participation by State (2024–2025 Data)
State SNAP Participation Rate Political Lean New Mexico ~21% Blue/Swing Mississippi ~19% Red Louisiana ~18% Red West Virginia ~17% Red Oregon ~16% Blue Kentucky ~15% Red Alabama ~14% Red New York ~13% Blue
Sources: USDA, CBPP, and Factually reports
Key Insights
- Red states often have higher poverty rates, lower median incomes, and more rural populations, which contribute to higher SNAP reliance.
- Blue states may have larger total SNAP caseloads due to population size (e.g., California, New York), but lower per-capita rates.
- SNAP is federally funded, so state-level participation reflects economic need more than political ideology.
Fact Check: state population percent using snap benefits ranking
Executive Summary New Mexico had the highest share of residents on SNAP in the 2024–2025 reporting cited here, with about 21% of its population receiving ...factually.co
Fact Check: state population percent using snap benefits ranking
Executive Summary New Mexico had the highest share of residents on SNAP in the 2024–2025 reporting cited here, with about 21% of its population receiving ...
factually.co![]()
Too many people "depend" on SNAP...The focus should be on lowering those numbers.Do the Red States depend more on SNAP than the blue states?
Stop lying, MAGA.
Yes, many red states show higher per-capita reliance on SNAP (food stamps) than blue states, though the picture is nuanced. States like New Mexico, Mississippi, Louisiana, and West Virginia—often considered red or swing states—have some of the highest participation rates.
Here’s a snapshot of states with the highest percentage of residents receiving SNAP benefits:
SNAP Participation by State (2024–2025 Data)
State SNAP Participation Rate Political Lean New Mexico ~21% Blue/Swing Mississippi ~19% Red Louisiana ~18% Red West Virginia ~17% Red Oregon ~16% Blue Kentucky ~15% Red Alabama ~14% Red New York ~13% Blue
Sources: USDA, CBPP, and Factually reports
Key Insights
- Red states often have higher poverty rates, lower median incomes, and more rural populations, which contribute to higher SNAP reliance.
- Blue states may have larger total SNAP caseloads due to population size (e.g., California, New York), but lower per-capita rates.
- SNAP is federally funded, so state-level participation reflects economic need more than political ideology.
Fact Check: state population percent using snap benefits ranking
Executive Summary New Mexico had the highest share of residents on SNAP in the 2024–2025 reporting cited here, with about 21% of its population receiving ...factually.co
Fact Check: state population percent using snap benefits ranking
Executive Summary New Mexico had the highest share of residents on SNAP in the 2024–2025 reporting cited here, with about 21% of its population receiving ...
factually.co![]()
Trump reallocated funds for military housing to pay for his wall. Tapping the contingency funds is easily doable if he so chooses.
He invents insurrections in blue cities to justify national guard, he can designate loss of SNAP funds as an emergency.
Lamont to use $3 million in emergency state funding to help residents expected to lose SNAP benefits amid government shutdown
As I said the Dems should back down let the cuts the Republicans want to go through go through and make sure people know it was the Republicans that cut the programs the red states depend on the most were all the republicans fault.It seems like a no-brainer to do so. He'd get the credit and then could point to the (D)s as "not helping you get the food your family needs."
Too many people "depend" on SNAP...The focus should be on lowering those numbers.
The present situation, however, is certainly not the President's fault...
And everyone is very aware of that...
Most states are being honest when communicating with their residents...
Trump is not about serving the electorate's legitimate needs.
It's about dictatorial power, nothing more nothing less.