The most important unresolved scientific questions, in my opinion.

[Cypress]

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Void.

He's asking you for a reputable source proving that radiometric dating is discredited and doesn't work.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. You try to present your opinion as fact in regards to a variety of topics that you find politically inconvenient, but your claims mean nothing unless you can explain SPECIFICALLY why radiometric dating doesn't work.

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

He's asking you for a reputable source proving that radiometric dating is discredited and doesn't work.

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Sybil.

 

[CIA TOTALITARIANISM]

Scientism and strict physical materialism is severely limited. Truth - at least those truths that matter in a human life - usually have nothing to do with empirical data and testable postulates. Most of the truths that really matter are those we make for ourselves, through morality, values, art, music, imagination, creativity.

but the Catholic church being the only version of valid christianity is a hard rule for you.


got it.

 

[ZenMode]

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Void.

So you have nothing by unfounded opinions. Epic failure noted.

 

[Cypress]

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Sybil.

Thanks for confessing you just can't prove your claim that radiometric dating doesn't work.

 

[ZenMode]

Thanks for confessing you just can't prove your claim that radiometric dating doesn't work.

He'll just keep saying it doesn't exist or doesn't work and pretend that repeating those two things will magically make it true.... just as he did with a dozen things related to CO2/climate change.

 

[Into the Night]

So you have nothing by unfounded opinions. Epic failure noted.

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Void. Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Thanks for confessing you just can't prove your claim that radiometric dating doesn't work.

I never made any such claim, Sybil. You are hallucinating again.

 

[Into the Night]

He'll just keep saying it doesn't exist or doesn't work

Never did, Void.

and pretend that repeating those two things will magically make it true....

Never said any such thing, Void. Stop gaslighting.

just as he did with a dozen things related to CO2/climate change.

Climate cannot change, Void. CO2 is a compound.

 

[ZenMode]

There is no link to what doesn't exist, Void. Assumption of victory fallacy.

There are MANY links talking about radiometric dating that explain how it works.

So.......

Where is your link explaining that it doesn't work? If you don't have a link, on what is your opinion base?

 

[Into the Night]

There are MANY links talking about radiometric dating that explain how it works.

You are not asking for such a link.

So.......

Where is your link explaining that it doesn't work? If you don't have a link, on what is your opinion base?

RQAA. There is no link for something that doesn't exist.

 

[ZenMode]

You are not asking for such a link.

RQAA. There is no link for something that doesn't exist.

Lol....you are a joke.

Again, repeating lies doesn't make them truths. You know this, but insist on playing dumb. Whatever melts your butter.

Thanks for playing. Your white flag is acknowledged.

 

[Into the Night]

Lol....you are a joke.

Thanks for playing. Your white flag is acknowledged.

Assumption of victory fallacy. Strawman fallacy.

 

[ZenMode]

Assumption of victory fallacy. Strawman fallacy.

Nope. You have nothing but baseless claims.

Radiometric dating exists. You, again are either a troll or delusional. Either way, since you can't support your claim, which you've had ample opportunity to do, you have surrendered.

Better luck next time!

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. You have nothing but baseless claims.

I am not making a claim. YOU ARE.

Radiometric dating exists.

Sure it does. I never said otherwise.

You, again are either a troll or delusional. Either way, since you can't support your claim, which you've had ample opportunity to do, you have surrendered.

I am not making a claim. YOU ARE.

Better luck next time!

Assumption of victory fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

but the Catholic church being the only version of valid christianity is a hard rule for you.


got it.

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

 

[serenity]

1) a. What caused the Big Bang to happen? How exactly does matter and energy spring into existence from nothing?
1) b. Why were the physical and mathematical properties which dropped out of the Big Bang so finely tuned for the creation of complex matter and molecules?

2) a. What is consciousness, and how exactly does it emerge from biochemistry?
2) b. How do electrochemical potentials from our sensory organs result in a rich, subjective mental experience of the physical world?

3) a. How did biology emerge from chemistry, how exactly does matter and energy go from non-being to being?
3) b. Why was there only one genesis of life on Earth around 4 billion years ago (available evidence indicating that all life that ever existed here shares a common genetic origin)? Why is there no evidence of multiple genesis's of different genetic trees of life?



Backdrop:

Real scientists love mysteries and unanswered questions.

Ideological partisans seek to either invoke miraculous intervention, or to sweep inconvenient uncertainties under the rug.

there never was a big bang, just a giant implosion of matter into an eight hemisphere universal moment of time life exists reproductively separating ancestries living in a single atmosphere indefinitely until a species eliminates the life in that atmosphere when it became smart enough to fool every generation gap in each ancestral lineage living daily.