Honestly, if it takes TVs, gyms, escorts, massage therapists, personal chefs, manicurists, and aestheticians, in order for them not to be recidivists, then there's a far cheaper way to deal with these fuck-ups.
You're setting up a false situation here, though.
Yes, it takes TVs and gyms and rec periods to keep them from going crazy while locked up.
It takes classes - yoga, AA, wood working, GED, budgeting, etc - to get them healthy - i.e. not addicted; able to cope in the outside world; and able to get jobs.
No one is talking about chefs and manicurists and whatnot - although prisoners often do give each other manicures and what not, no one is talking about the state providing those.
If we don't do these things, we end up with a permanent criminal class that preys on the rest of us.
There are things we invest in as a society - such as public schools - because in the long run it makes a more stable society.
Studies out there show recidivism is lessened - and our costs are lessened - when we treat prisoners humanely and work to get them able to function in society.
A California study (that I should have bookmarked) showed that when the state cut way back on early release programs for good behavior - well, inmates stopped behaving well. They had no incentive to take classes or work or whatever, so they stopped doing all that, started acting up more, and it cost us more both in terms of $$ and longer sentences and more guards AND in having inmates less ready to function outside.