The NRA's offensive hypocrisy

christiefan915

Catalyst
When will the organization demand justice for black gun owners shot by police?

Right in the midst of a national outrage over a video of police in Louisiana shooting Alton Sterling while holding him on the ground, yet another video of a police shooting of a black man has come out. This video, filmed in Falcon Heights, Minnesota, shows a man named Philando Castile writhing in pain with blood splattered all over his car while his girlfriend says that a police officer shot Castile after asking Castile, responding to requests for his license, reached for his wallet. Castile later died of his wounds.

...what these two videos have in common is the police in question excuse their actions by citing the presence of a gun.

Here are two American citizens that were killed while doing what the NRA claims is a constitutional right. Surely this must be a gross injustice in the eyes of the NRA! Surely they will be demanding action, petitioning congressmen, demanding the Department of Justice to step forward and make sure that every American has a right to arm themselves without fear of being gunned down by the police! Right?

But while progressive Twitter is all about protesting these deaths, if you go to the NRA Twitter feed, this is what you’ll find: Whining about Matt Damon’s gun opinions. Harping on some impolitic words from a community college professor. Putting up some free advertising for Remington.

What you do get, however, is some overt race-baiting from the NRA, tweets that unsubtly try to imply to their largely white audience that they are in danger of being victimized, mostly by people of color, and that they need to arm themselves in response.

But when it comes to the deaths of these two Americans who appear to be killed while exercising their legal right to carry guns? Crickets.

http://www.salon.com/2016/07/07/nra..._justice_for_black_gun_owners_shot_by_police/
 
de299741-8f79-4600-93cf-b99b12e0dc1d_zpsi5yadkc8.jpg
 
The Founders never intended the Second Amendment to give black people the right to bear arms.

Meanwhile the NRA is funding campaign ads for Trump.
 
I wonder what the NRA would say about this? Plenty of guns, just what they call for.

"The sniper who killed five Dallas police officers Thursday night was a former Army reservist who told police negotiators he “wanted to kill white people” even as his home held an arsenal of bomb-making materials and firearms. During a search of Micah Xavier Johnson's home, detectives found bomb making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat tactics, the Dallas Police Department reported late Friday...

Johnson, who wore a dashiki and held a fist aloft on his Facebook page, had a temper and owned "a lot of guns," according to the friend...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/0...l-rage-that-drove-snipers-deadly-rampage.html
 
I wonder what the NRA would say about this? Plenty of guns, just what they call for.

"The sniper who killed five Dallas police officers Thursday night was a former Army reservist who told police negotiators he “wanted to kill white people” even as his home held an arsenal of bomb-making materials and firearms. During a search of Micah Xavier Johnson's home, detectives found bomb making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat tactics, the Dallas Police Department reported late Friday...

Johnson, who wore a dashiki and held a fist aloft on his Facebook page, had a temper and owned "a lot of guns," according to the friend...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/0...l-rage-that-drove-snipers-deadly-rampage.html

Do they recommended going out to kill multiple police officers?
 
I wonder what the NRA would say about this? Plenty of guns, just what they call for.

"The sniper who killed five Dallas police officers Thursday night was a former Army reservist who told police negotiators he “wanted to kill white people” even as his home held an arsenal of bomb-making materials and firearms. During a search of Micah Xavier Johnson's home, detectives found bomb making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat tactics, the Dallas Police Department reported late Friday...

Johnson, who wore a dashiki and held a fist aloft on his Facebook page, had a temper and owned "a lot of guns," according to the friend...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/0...l-rage-that-drove-snipers-deadly-rampage.html
Truly sad, you would wonder as a friend or family member if there was anything you could have done to prevent it.
 
detectives found bomb making materials, ballistic vests, rifles, ammunition, and a personal journal of combat tactics, the Dallas Police Department reported late Friday...

Johnson, who wore a dashiki and held a fist aloft on his Facebook page, had a temper and owned "a lot of guns,"
more 2nd amendment madness
 
Of course not. But what kind of damage do you think he could have done if he didn't have a lot of guns?

Maybe he would be just another poster like us, venting our rage on forums.

I can't speak for the NRA but clearly they support the 2nd amendment. Was there anything in the person's background that should have disqualified him from legally purchasing a gun? (assuming that's how he got his guns)
 
I can't speak for the NRA but clearly they support the 2nd amendment. Was there anything in the person's background that should have disqualified him from legally purchasing a gun? (assuming that's how he got his guns)

My point is that anyone can snap, which apparently he did. And the more access an angry person has to guns, the more likely he is to use them.
 
My point is that anyone can snap, which apparently he did. And the more access an angry person has to guns, the more likely he is to use them.

I do not disagree at all that anyone can snap but history has shown us very very few have snapped and gone out to shoot eleven cops (assuming he was the only shooter).
 
The 2nd Amendment argument is bunk to begin with. The one and only reason people fight so hard for the "right" to carry or own guns is because.....guns are fun. They think they're cool. That's really the only rational argument you can make.

And to date, we think this level of "fun" is worth the price of some 30,000 people annually.
 
christifan, as to your OP I too would like to hear what the NRA has to say on the issue and wish they would speak out. There are states with legal concealed carry and I'm sure there must be a way that cops are taught to deal with it when pulling someone over like what occurred in MN.
 
Back
Top