The REALITY that the Alt Right does not want to face about San Francisco and NYC

Walt said:
Too many people want to live in San Francisco and NYC. That is just a fact. There is not enough room for them all, so our society does what capitalist societies do, and drives up the prices until many people cannot afford to live in those places.

Artists haven't been able to live in Greenwich Village(NYC) in decades. It is darn expensive, and hard to swing without a high six figure income.

So if people are driven from San Francisco and NYC, then there are more than enough people to replace them. It might even allow both to get back to more creative, bohemian roots.
Click to expand...
You're high. Pull up some videos of today's Detroit; that's the future of all Blue cities.
 
Walt said:
I have not declared "too much population". I am the one talking about giving people the right to decide if they want to use birth control or not, so not declaring myself king.
Click to expand...

This thread is not about birth control. You don't to decide who can use birth control. You are not the king. See if you can stick to the subject of the thread.
 
Walt said:
Easy availability of birth control means that even if people have intercourse, they will not have a lot of children. Many countries around the world are having actual falling populations.
Click to expand...

And committing demographic suicide in the process.
 
Into the Night said:
False premise. Population increases for many reasons. People like to fuck. To attribute it only to illegal immigration is a divisional error.
Click to expand...

1. The 'Population' in the US has stabilized.
2. I'm NOT "attribute it only to illegal immigration". I'm attributing it to ALL immigration.

You support 'Open Borders'.
I support 'Closed Borders'.
We seem to disagree.
 
Into the Night said:
You don't get to declare 'overpopulation'. You are not the king. The Earth is still here. It hasn't been destroyed.
Click to expand...

:) I have an opinion. This is a 'political forum'. It's where people exchange ideas.
Waiting until we are standing shoulder-to-shoulder isn't my idea of dealing with the problem.
 
Jack said:
:) I have an opinion. This is a 'political forum'. It's where people exchange ideas.
Waiting until we are standing shoulder-to-shoulder isn't my idea of dealing with the problem.
Click to expand...

Extreme argument fallacy. You should get out into the country more. You've been spending to long in the city.
 
I've noticed that the people who suggest that we ought to "have less people" never seem to want to lead the way and start with themselves... Why is this?
 
gfm7175 said:
I've noticed that the people who suggest that we ought to "have less people" never seem to want to lead the way and start with themselves... Why is this?
Click to expand...

For the same reason Pelosi got her hair done, in violation of her own speeches. Good for thee, not for me.

Notice how the Democrats don't pay attention to the law, or even their own stated opinions?
 
Walt said:
Too many people want to live in San Francisco and New York City, so that is exactly the scenario. If some rich people move out, it will open things up for some of the many younger people who desperately want to live in these places, but cannot afford it.
Click to expand...

But the rich you are driving out provide the opportunities for the lesser caste so driving them away dooms the entire premise. You'll all be trading hand jobs without investors to rebuild what your crazy fucks burn down. Bravo on understanding economics and human nature. You guys are the best
 
tinfoil said:
But the rich you are driving out provide the opportunities for the lesser caste so driving them away dooms the entire premise. You'll all be trading hand jobs without investors to rebuild what your crazy fucks burn down. Bravo on understanding economics and human nature. You guys are the best
Click to expand...

You see yourself as a "lesser caste" hanging on to the rich? That is just sad.
 
Darth Omar said:
But consumers scratching a living off rocks don’t consume much.

What good are 1.5 B consumers if 1B of them can’t afford a small flatscreen? The ideal would be a solid numbers of *quality consumers* who have sufficient disposable income to but the extra stuff.

You get there by creating good jobs *for the people already here*. Or better yet, keep the government from becoming an impediment to job creation.

Keep taxes low and decrease government regulation. The economy will do the rest. It’s not Trump’s economy or Obama’s economy—it’s our economy, and the less they try and ‘fix it’ the better off we all are.

See how easy that is?
Click to expand...
as the buying power of the Chinese consumer grows it becomes inevitable that what is available for purchase will be controlled by their tastes rather than that of the American consumer.......there are simply so many more of them than there are of anyone else......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top