The right cancels Kimmel

Yup...

Just as I said, Kimmel: “desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them"

Gaslighting. Lying.
That is not actually a lie.

What he is saying is 'all magats care about (desperate to do) is to point fingers and say he is not a magat'.

THat is not Kimmel saying he is a magat and is him saying BEFORE WE HAD ANY FACTS 'he is of the left' based on no facts as they were desperate for him no to be of the right.

THat is an accurate statement.
 
I promise this - if Al Sharpton is ever shot by a white supremist - and media people desperately try to paint the narrative that he was shot by a black guy - I will move heaven and earth to have them removed as a mouth piece in America.
Is he still alive?
 
It seems like the network chose to self censor. The government took no action, Carr spoke on a podcast about a vague future and the corporation decided that it was best to salt the fields rather than continue to gaslight, there there were literally infinite possibilities.

If you do not like the choice they made, talk to ABC.
You believe the threats of action had no effect?

CC Chairman Brendan Carr (on a podcast) called Kimmel’s remarks “truly sick,” and said the FCC had “a strong case” for holding ABC/Disney accountable. He suggested licensed broadcasters ("licensed stations") might face consequences if they continue airing his show. AP News+1
 
That is not actually a lie.

What he is saying is 'all magats care about (desperate to do) is to point fingers and say he is not a magat'.

THat is not Kimmel saying he is a magat and is him saying BEFORE WE HAD ANY FACTS 'he is of the left' based on no facts as they were desperate for him no to be of the right.

THat is an accurate statement.
LMFAO bye bye Jimmy
 
You believe the threats of action had no effect?

CC Chairman Brendan Carr (on a podcast) called Kimmel’s remarks “truly sick,” and said the FCC had “a strong case” for holding ABC/Disney accountable. He suggested licensed broadcasters ("licensed stations") might face consequences if they continue airing his show. AP News+1
Yes, thank you for confirming what I said. He spoke about a vague future on a podcast. Then ABC chose the "salt the fields" option. No government action was taken, nobody has been arrested, nobody is being prosecuted... nada. He did not "suggest" for them to cancel. That's made up nonsense on your part. He (paraphrasing, not quoting) something like, "we may have to think about doing something if they keep letting him lie on the air"....

If you do not like the decision that ABC made, you need to talk to ABC.
 
It seems like the network chose to self censor. The government took no action, Carr spoke on a podcast about a vague future and the corporation decided that it was best to salt the fields rather than continue to gaslight, there there were literally infinite possibilities and they chose this one. Nobody in the government told them to cancel him, nobody was arrested, nobody at all told them to do what they did, they did this on their own decision.

If you do not like the choice they made, talk to ABC.
Stop lying.

Carr as FTC Chairman made a direct threat telling them to take action or 'we can do this the easy way or hard way'. Trump spoke prior that these firings were coming after Colbert was let go. The distributor (station owners) in this instance need FTC approval to get a massive merger thru they are working on right now and they need Carr and his FTC to allow it.

You are engaging in nothing but lies and spin.

BUt as i said above. I want this new standard. I want a future Dem Potus to be able to put in his FTC Chair as an attack dog to go right at these same spots for magat media.

And what i know for certain is suddenly you will be offended by it. But i won't.
 
Stop lying.

Carr as FTC Chairman made a direct threat telling them to take action or 'we can do this the easy way or hard way'. Trump spoke prior that these firings were coming after Colbert was let go. The distributor (station owners) in this instance need FTC approval to get a massive merger thru they are working on right now and they need Carr and his FTC to allow it.

You are engaging in nothing but lies and spin.

BUt as i said above. I want this new standard. I want a future Dem Potus to be able to put in his FTC Chair as an attack dog to go right at these same spots for magat media.

And what i know for certain is suddenly you will be offended by it. But i won't.
No matter how many times you say it, talking about a vague future is not demanding they cancel that show. That decision is on ABC. Even if you do not like what Carr said, the decision to burn the fields and salt the ground was ABC's and not something ordered by the FCC.
 
trumps-fascist-america-v0-mzgb5zua8vpf1.jpeg
 
Yes, thank you for confirming what I said. He spoke about a vague future on a podcast. Then ABC chose the "salt the fields" option. No government action was taken, nobody has been arrested, nobody is being prosecuted... nada. He did not "suggest" for them to cancel. That's made up nonsense on your part. He (paraphrasing, not quoting) something like, "we may have to think about doing something if they keep letting him lie on the air"....

If you do not like the decision that ABC made, you need to talk to ABC.
I do not care about kemmel, never watched him. I care about the first Amendmnet.

After that threat, what did the stations do?

Do you feel its appropriate for the government to threaten illegal action against a broadcaster because they did not like the message?
 
No matter how many times you say it, talking about a vague future is not demanding they cancel that show. That decision is on ABC. Even if you do not like what Carr said, the decision to burn the fields and salt the ground was ABC's and not something ordered by the FCC.

It wasn't ordered - but his words were pretty clear, imo.

I'm surprised some are okay w/ this. I feel like the lines are getting blurred here.
 
That is not actually a lie.

What he is saying is 'all magats care about (desperate to do) is to point fingers and say he is not a magat'.

THat is not Kimmel saying he is a magat and is him saying BEFORE WE HAD ANY FACTS 'he is of the left' based on no facts as they were desperate for him no to be of the right.

THat is an accurate statement.
It is not an "accurate statement".

Truth: The kid was not a right winger.

False: The right is desperately trying to tell you he isn't a right winger.

Only one of those is a true statement. The only people desperately trying to gaslight people into something are the folks trying to paint that kid as a right winger.
 
No matter how many times you say it, talking about a vague future is not demanding they cancel that show. That decision is on ABC. Even if you do not like what Carr said, the decision to burn the fields and salt the ground was ABC's and not something ordered by the FCC.
As i said i am all for this 'vague pressure', where FTC chairmans can say to companies in the midst of merger or license renewal talks, that 'do not take this as any thing other than a vague comment on the future and when i need to rule on your merger or license. You can fire Kimmel and we can do this the easy way, or we can do this the hard way'.

That type of 'vague future talk' being ok with you Damocles is even more OK with me. Carr leveled a clear and undenyable threat that the Media companies could take action against Kimmel and we could do this the easy way and if not they would do this the hard way with the FTC utilizing "remedies" they had to make this the 'hard way'.



BTW did you take offense prior talk about the left 'cancelling comedians' and what about Trump and magats saying they 'were bringing comedy back again and freeing it up for free speech again'? What was your views on that?


Here is what Carr said in years past when not in power...


a6hb5m.jpg


a6hbbw.jpg


a6hbjp.jpg


a6hbnw.jpg








a6haoy.jpg
 
Last edited:
To you were for the cancel culture as long as they were canceling the Right but now that they are canceling the Left you are against it. That is the very definition of double standard. :laugh:
Show me where I've ever said I want to cancel anyone's speech, idiot.
 
The public interest is best served when a lie is recognized as a lie.

The shooter was not, is not, in any way whatsoever, a right winger.

He shot and killed a Trump supporter.

Kimmel lied and was called out for that lie.

He did it to himself.
 
Back
Top