The right thing to do

Hello IBDaMann,

The list needs to be those who were thrown under the bus.

I'm thinking of five different Muslims in the US. How were they "thrown under the bus" by Trump?
I'm thinking of about thirty immigrants that I know personally, roughly half legal and the other half illegal. How did Trump throw them under the bus?
How was Mueller "thrown under the bus"?
How was Jeff Sessions?

My guess is that you never learned what "throw under the bus" means and instead think it means "not rescue from what's coming."

Um, OK, we need to get something straight.

I am not here to listen to you talking about me.

If you want to talk politics, that is one thing. I will be happy to exchange ideas on politics. But it will be on an academic level. The merit of your argument compared to the merit of mine.

I simply refuse to get into a personal thing, trying to make it about each other. That's really just shallow and boring. I know it's ever so popular around here, and if you have to have it that way, go for it without me. I have no desire to participate or try to keep up with the food fights. I filter all of that out. But if you can talk politics for the knowledge of politics, that's the people I like to talk to.

I draw your attention to my:

Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

If you can agree to that, I'd enjoy a spirited discussion of the ideas and principles.

If not, then we won't be talking long, so you may as well give me your best shot. It will be your final chance to communicate to me.

Clear enough?
 
Um, OK, we need to get something straight. I am not here to listen to you talking about me.

If you want to talk politics, that is one thing. I will be happy to exchange ideas on politics. But it will be on an academic level. The merit of your argument compared to the merit of mine.
Outstanding! Consider that something straight. However, we need to get something else straight as well. You have to own what you express, and if you express something really stupid, I will point it out and you will like it. If you make an error and I point out that you are operating under a misconception, you can't get all snowflake offended, even it involves you being totally unaware of Trump's accomplishments.

As to the academic merits of arguments, here is a list of common fallacies so you can peruse in advance and not make them.

I simply refuse to get into a personal thing,
Fair enough. No complaints here. Just keep in mind that I know everything and people don't like discussing with me because no one likes a know-it-all. But having said that, what shall we discuss?

Check my sig. Do you believe in Global Warming? Do you believe BLM are just "peaceful protesters"? The sky is the limit. You can make a new thread if you want.
 
Goodbye IBDaMann,

Outstanding! Consider that something straight. However, we need to get something else straight as well. You have to own what you express, and if you express something really stupid, I will point it out and you will like it. If you make an error and I point out that you are operating under a misconception, you can't get all snowflake offended, even it involves you being totally unaware of Trump's accomplishments.

There ya go. Making it personal again.

I would think if you're only going to get one chance to tell me off you could have come up with something more spectacular, but so be it.

My PIP is unconditional. It is either agreed without conditions, because it makes sense on a two-way basis, or there can be no respectful communication. And that is the case here.

This communication has ended.
 
At the Osaka G20 meeting, Xi explained to Trump why he was building concentration camps in Xinjiang [an estimated 1-2 million ethnic minority Uighurs have been detained in these camps for “re-education”]. Trump said that Xi should go ahead with building the camps, which he thought was exactly the right thing to do.

- John Bolton, The Room Where It Happened, page 312.

So Xi went ahead without fear of sanctions, indeed with the backing of the leader of the free world. Was this the right thing to say?

Jesus Christ. Trump has to go.
 
Goodbye IBDaMann,

There ya go. Making it personal again.

I would think if you're only going to get one chance to tell me off you could have come up with something more spectacular, but so be it.

My PIP is unconditional. It is either agreed without conditions, because it makes sense on a two-way basis, or there can be no respectful communication. And that is the case here.

This communication has ended.
Now I see that your offer was not genuine. Now I see that you were just planning on making infantile comments while seeking to control my speech. I just went through this twice on other boards. You were engaging in Mantra 6 on the list I gave you.

The answer is "No" ... you don't get to reserve the term "civilized discourse" only for exchanges in which you determine what I am to say. You were obviously going to wait for me to disagree with you and then declare that you were "offended". No thanks.

I'm guessing that you don't know anything of interest anyway. Let me know if anything changes, like when you feel a strange surge of intellectul fortitude.
 
Jesus Christ. Trump has to go.
Everybody look, Mr. Snowflake popped his head of his safe space. Isn't he darling.

November 4th, 2020 has been declared Snowflake Day in which snowflakes emerge from their safe spaces, see their own election results, wail in declaration of four more years of Trump and then scurry back into their holes.

attachment.php
 
Now I see that your offer was not genuine. Now I see that you were just planning on making infantile comments while seeking to control my speech. I just went through this twice on other boards. You were engaging in Mantra 6 on the list I gave you.

The answer is "No" ... you don't get to reserve the term "civilized discourse" only for exchanges in which you determine what I am to say. You were obviously going to wait for me to disagree with you and then declare that you were "offended". No thanks.

I'm guessing that you don't know anything of interest anyway. Let me know if anything changes, like when you feel a strange surge of intellectul fortitude.

PoleSmoker is a disingenuous, smarmy, pseudo-intellectual toad.
 
Everybody look, Mr. Snowflake popped his head of his safe space. Isn't he darling.

November 4th, 2020 has been declared Snowflake Day in which snowflakes emerge from their safe spaces, see their own election results, wail in declaration of four more years of Trump and then scurry back into their holes.

attachment.php

Typical fascist trying to silence all opposition with inane insults.

When Trump loses in November, don't go berserk. We don't need another mall shooter.
 
Back
Top