I believe you missed the
trafn days but he was the first person to be banned from Climate-Debate. He was also the only person to ever be a moderator (with his own board) on Climate-Debate, per his repeated insistence and branner eventually caved. He singled out posters like myself, Tim the Plumber, Into the Night, others ... as "denialist trolls" who could only participate if we adopted his views. All the other snowfakes were welcome to post without censor because they were of the correct view.
I had no intention of participating in a kiddie pool. I immediatly copy-pasted posts from that forum as you mentioned above, based new threads on them in the main Climate-Debate forum and began discussions mocking the idiot ideas expressed.
trafn had a schitf-it and went into self-destruct mode. I highly recommend you glance at some of trafn's final posts when you get a chance. Keep in mind that he was originally a spammer who was going from site to site trying to generate interest in
his book which is absolutely the WACKIEST catastrophic Climate Change end-of-the-world theory ... but when Into the Night and I tore into
his thesis, he did not appreciate our "suggestions" and it irritated him so much that he stuck around to preach. He could not tolerate the thought that there was someone out there who had rejected his faith.
The common thread here is intellectual cowardice and the need to control the speech of others. PoliTalker, trafn, tmiddles, et. al. have their own mantra in the master list, i.e. 6) Feigning Partnership or Offer to Work Together or Insincere Desire to Work Through the Math. The idea is to get the opponent to "lighten up" and to make concessions "for the sake of working together" while having no intention of reciprocating with said amicable spirit. PoliTalker is going to have a long wait before I fall for that.
... but the answer to your question is that I don't know if I'm on his "Ignore" list yet or not.