The Ron Paul that Ron Paul does not want you to know

Feel free to believe in whatever sounds good to you. But his association and participation in nazi fascist hate groups begs to differ.


The only modern nazi fascists I know of are anti-western globalists trying to destroy freedom with Internationalist Fascism, which they justify with decontextualized "free trade" arguments.
 
Feel free to believe in whatever sounds good to you. But his association and participation in nazi fascist hate groups begs to differ.
So, if I took this post and placed it on one of those sites, regardless of your wishes, would that mean you "participated" in that site?
 
Or if they took, Diana DeGette's Congressional Office address and posted it on one of those sites would that mean she "participated" in the site?
 
blackascoal is a jew, coming here to try to split blacks and whites, when the real war is between globalists and people who just want to be left alone, secure in their nation, and in control of their own immigration policy.
 
Honestly, why are you spending so much time on Ron Paul? He's not going to win.

I don't really even want him to win. I just have a tremendous respect for him.

Good question.

First, it should be pointed out to liberals and progressives who support him how ignorantly they've fallen for a dangerous and vile illusion as easily as the right-wing we challenge. This is a man who makes George Bush look like Humanitarian of the Year. I have no problem with him being supported by libertarians and his ilk, but any liberal / progressive support for him is mindless.

Additionally, I detest his comments about blacks. The fact that he cannot win does not deter me from illuminating what this man is.

I'm a citizen, not a subject, and I'm simply following my Jeffersonian duty and responsibility as such.
 
Last edited:
blackascoal is a jew, coming here to try to split blacks and whites, when the real war is between globalists and people who just want to be left alone, secure in their nation, and in control of their own immigration policy.
Is that the worst insult you can dream up? Or do you honestly believe that everybody that disagrees with you is a "globalist joooo nazi"?
 
blackascoal is a jew, coming here to try to split blacks and whites, when the real war is between globalists and people who just want to be left alone, secure in their nation, and in control of their own immigration policy.

I'm a Jew?

Split blacks and whites?

Note to self: Keep any conversation with Mr. AssHat on the cartoon level.
 
Or if they took, Diana DeGette's Congressional Office address and posted it on one of those sites would that mean she "participated" in the site?

No, but when you attend their functions and go on their talk shows, that does in fact mean you participated.

Paul doesn't deny that, and I'm willing to bet that you can't find one single comment of his that repudiates these hate groups he seems to be such a darling of. I can however, give you his quotes that denounce civil rights groups and organizations.

You tell me .. how do you become President of the United States in the 21st century with his associatons and statements? Can you name anyone else that has?
 
No, but when you attend their functions and go on their talk shows, that does in fact mean you participated.

Paul doesn't deny that, and I'm willing to bet that you can't find one single comment of his that repudiates these hate groups he seems to be such a darling of. I can however, give you his quotes that denounce civil rights groups and organizations.

You tell me .. how do you become President of the United States in the 21st century with his associatons and statements? Can you name anyone else that has?
Which hate group has Ron Paul actually gone to a function of? So far you have posted a few quotes that have yet to be proven to be his in context. Then you posted a site that had his congressional office address on it.

So far you have about as much, or less, on this than AHZ does on the supposed Kennedy Family Conspiracy to Take Over The World....

I am not saying you are wrong in that those remarks are discomfitting, to say the least, I am saying that you are insisting his "participation" without evidence of such yet displayed.
 
See what I mean :D

Anyone who can convince themselves that raced based preference systems are not race based preference systems, has a brainwash problem. Some people will actually diminish their own capacity for critical thought to be in accordance with the party line. "Whites bad, everyone else good."
 
You're a jew or brainwashed by a jew. That describes about 70% of the population, so don't feel too bad.

Went off your paranoia-reduction meds again, huh?

Why don't you wait for Bottleborne to arrive...he speaks Chimpanzee sign language. Not well, other chimps look at each other and ask "Is it my imagination or does this f'ing guy make no sense?" when he's signing, but, you two should understand each other.
 
Went off your paranoia-reduction meds again, huh?

Why don't you wait for Bottleborne to arrive...he speaks Chimpanzee sign language. Not well, other chimps look at each other and ask "Is it my imagination or does this f'ing guy make no sense?" when he's signing, but, you two should understand each other.

You support race based preference systemd, aka racial discrimination. No amount of ad hominem attack against me will change the reality of your monstrous bigotry.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who can convince themselves that raced based preference systems are not race based preference systems, has a brainwash problem. Some people will actually diminish their own capacity for critical thought to be in accordance with the party line. "Whites bad, everyone else good."

Keep up I was responding to BAC, on your Joo fetish.
 
But... he's not going to lose his district. It would be a rather amazing feat for someone to lose on their 10th election for a district whenever they've won by 40 point margins in each election they've run with trememdous amounts of money from both parties being directed at defeated him.

Here are the first vote returns in his race against Greg Laughlin who was a democrat that switched parties ...

Laughlin 14,721 42 percent
Paul 11,080 32 percent
Deats 8,453 24 percent


Because the south has runoffs if a candidate doesn't get 50%, there was a runoff. In the runoff, Deats threw his support to Paul because of personal issues with Laughlin. It's a small district and it has changed since then. At that time 75% of the district was white, 26% hispanic, and 12% black. Today, 40% of the district is hispanic, and 18% is black.

He beat his last opponent, Shane Sklar, a democrat, 60-40.

Only 7% of his campaign funds come from within the district, the other 93% from outside the district.

He most certainly can be beaten.
 
Here are the first vote returns in his race against Greg Laughlin who was a democrat that switched parties ...

Laughlin 14,721 42 percent
Paul 11,080 32 percent
Deats 8,453 24 percent


Because the south has runoffs if a candidate doesn't get 50%, there was a runoff. In the runoff, Deats threw his support to Paul because of personal issues with Laughlin. It's a small district and it has changed since then. At that time 75% of the district was white, 26% hispanic, and 12% black. Today, 40% of the district is hispanic, and 18% is black.

He beat his last opponent, Shane Sklar, a democrat, 60-40.

Only 7% of his campaign funds come from within the district, the other 93% from outside the district.

He most certainly can be beaten.
And what time was this?

Ohhhh. I see. 1996.

Since then what has he won by? And in the run off, at the R assembly it turns out that Paul won? Interesting. You had to go back to the Congressional District Assembly to find a result like that, and in 1996?! Come on, you can do better than that!
 
I'm miles ahead. I was just adding the comment that anyone who believes racial discrimination is not racial discrimination is obviously brainwashed.
I have trod down your discrimination against whites road all I intend to. Some might enjoy arguing with a brick wall but not me.
 
Back
Top