The shooter is a Tea Party member in Colorado...

Aoxomoxoa said:
They were banned until 2004 when Bush chose to let the legislation lapse, remind me how many guns in the 18th century were capable of firing at 60 rounds per minute?
Click to expand...

The 18th century is not the weapons tech standard today in the 21st century now is it? See what you and other 'nose in the air' libs fail to read in the 2nd amendment that is genius of the founders, who btw were breaking from the oppression of your side of the pond, is the phrase at the end which states: "The right of the people, shall not be infringed"...

So regardless of what you think I should own here in a different country than you even live in, the gall of that thinking, I really don't care. You can't do a damned thing about it.
 
Last edited:
j-mac said:
?... is the phrase at the end which states: "The right of the people, shall not be abridged"...
Click to expand...

Just a slight correction before you get blasted for it .. not "abridged" but "infringed." You know how some will try to get you on a technicality when a good argument can't be made. ;)
 
leaningright said:
Just a slight correction before you get blasted for it .. not "abridged" but "infringed." You know how some will try to get you on a technicality when a good argument can't be made. ;)
Click to expand...

Thank you...I changed it...But I know what you mean...Even though the meat of the phrase I bolded was "The right of the people, shall not...."
 
Socrtease said:
owning and driving a car is a privilege extended to you by the state. Owning a firearm is a right you possess and protected by the Constitution.
Click to expand...
disagree wholeheartedly. You have a right to acquire property and autos are property. You also have a right to travel freely using common methods of the times. I.e. you have a right to drive.
 
j-mac said:
The 18th century is not the weapons tech standard today in the 21st century now is it? See what you and other 'nose in the air' libs fail to read in the 2nd amendment that is genius of the founders, who btw were breaking from the oppression of your side of the pond, is the phrase at the end which states: "The right of the people, shall not be infringed"...

So regardless of what you think I should own here in a different country than you even live in, the gall of that thinking, I really don't care. You can't do a damned thing about it.
Click to expand...

I can say it is a load of bollocks, how's that??
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
I can say it is a load of bollocks, how's that??
Click to expand...


You can say what ever you wish, that is your opinion. However, the founders of this country, along with our Supreme court disagrees with you. So, your opinion means about as much as a bucket of warm spit.
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
They were banned until 2004 when Bush chose to let the legislation lapse, remind me how many guns in the 18th century were capable of firing at 60 rounds per minute?
Click to expand...

The guns owned by the ctizens in the 18th century were the same ones used by the US military at the time. They were state of the art. Whether they fire 60 rounds per minute or not, they were no less than what the best armed military infantryman carried.
 
WinterBorn said:
The guns owned by the ctizens in the 18th century were the same ones used by the US military at the time. They were state of the art. Whether they fire 60 rounds per minute or not, they were no less than what the best armed military infantryman carried.
Click to expand...

if i could i would merge this with another thread....you know what, in fact i will as hit home to that thread
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top