The So Called Deadly Climate Obsession of Governments, written by an idiot

AProudLefty

Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Governments everywhere have been undermining productive work, driven by a destructive climate change ideology that has developed into an obsession: stopping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, despite human suffering.

Look at this. This is what the idiot actually says.


On Labor Day (and every day) we ought to celebrate productive work and those who perform it because productive work makes our life possible and gives it meaning. However, governments everywhere have been undermining productive work, driven by a destructive climate change ideology that has developed into an obsession: stopping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, despite human suffering.


The productive work is not being undermining. What we want is human beings being safe from destructive effects they have been causing to the environment and their health.

https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2022/09/the-deadly-climate-obsession-of-governments/
 
Trivializing science doesn't change it.

Neither global warming nor 'climate change' is a theory or branch of science.

The 1st law of thermodynamics states: E(t+1) = E(t) - U where 'E' is energy, 't' is time, and 'U" is work. No gas or vapor is work, therefore 'U' is zero. You cannot create energy out of nothing. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

The 2nd law of thermodynamics states: e(t+1) >= e(t) where 'e' is entropy (the randomness of a given system), and 't' is time. This law defines heat and gives it a direction. Heat always flows from hot areas (lots of energy) to cold areas (relative voids of energy). Heat will continue until all temperatures are equal. The Church of Global Warming routinely claims you can heat a warmer surface using a colder gas, violating this law.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law relates temperature to radiance. It states: r = C*e*t^4 where 'r' is radiance in watts per square area, 'C' is a natural constant, 'e' is a measured constant (known as emissivity or absorptivity), and 't' is temperature in deg K.
In other words, as temperature increases, radiance increases, and more energy is converted to light, which is radiated into space. The Church of Global Warming tries to invert this relation.



You do not use statistics. You use random numbers of type randU (the 'psuedo' random number, thought up in someone's head). You deny and discard statistical math.
Using random numbers as 'data' is a fallacy (an error in logic).

You deny and discard science. It is about tyranny.

Your lack of understanding of thermodynamics will not make it go away. Make up stuff is not acceptable in science.
 
The Church of Global Warming (otherwise known as the Church of Climate Change) is a fundamentalist style religion. It routinely discards the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. It routinely discards mathematics, particularly statistical mathematics. This religion stems from the Church of Green, which in turn stems from the Church of Karl Marx. Because it is a religion, it needs no further justification than the religion itself. Anyone challenging the religion is a <pick insult string here>. The very nature of fundamentalism is to put down and condemn anyone that is not a true believer.

Yes. This is about implementing fascism and communism in the name of 'saving the planet'.

This is about tyranny.

Buzzword fallacy. Wordstuffing. Saving the planet is not fascism and communism.
 
Governments everywhere have been undermining productive work, driven by a destructive climate change ideology that has developed into an obsession: stopping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, despite human suffering.

Look at this. This is what the idiot actually says.


On Labor Day (and every day) we ought to celebrate productive work and those who perform it because productive work makes our life possible and gives it meaning. However, governments everywhere have been undermining productive work, driven by a destructive climate change ideology that has developed into an obsession: stopping greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, despite human suffering.


The productive work is not being undermining. What we want is human beings being safe from destructive effects they have been causing to the environment and their health.

https://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2022/09/the-deadly-climate-obsession-of-governments/

What do you suggest should be done? Do you think the shift to electric vehicles is a good idea? How about truck emissions? What should we do there and why?
 
What do you suggest should be done? Do you think the shift to electric vehicles is a good idea? How about truck emissions? What should we do there and why?

They are not going to "shift to electric vehicles". It's a gradual process. It's like with any technology advance. It gradually changes. It's going to take years and years.
 
Back
Top