The Supreme Court faces an existential crisis of legitimacy

There's about a zillion. But Dred Scott would be one of them, Buck v Bell, Korematsu v United States, The Civil Rights cases in 1883 (which allowed racial discrimination regardless of 13th and 14th amendments), Plessy v Ferguson ("separate but equal")...

Pretending that in the past the SCOTUS has had some perfect individuality when they agree with you, but that they are terrible partisans when they don't is pretty much one of the most favorite of the Modern Political Hack's Passtimes...

All due to white male racism


The right wing packed court is racist today too
 
All due to white male racism


The right wing packed court is racist today too

Nonsense. Just saying the words doesn't make it so, any more than your stupid story about spitting in the dude's face makes you racist. It's simple partisan hackery to pretend that everything the other side does that you don't like is "racism".

Nor were every single of the political decisions about race. I just listed some you would understand to be political, and since the Modern Leftist Hack today centers every thought on dividing the US into categories based on their melanin I thought you would relate.
 
Nonsense. Just saying the words doesn't make it so, any more than your stupid story about spitting in the dude's face makes you racist. It's simple partisan hackery to pretend that everything the other side does that you don't like is "racism".

Nor were every single of the political decisions about race. I just listed some you would understand to be political, and since the Modern Leftist Hack today centers every thought on dividing the US into categories based on their melanin I thought you would relate.

The race card...never leave home without it.

Most Americans have moved on but the far left can't drop it. It's all and I do mean all they have left.

Elections have consequences, if Hillary had won the 2016 election, the court would be majority liberal. Would that make the court racist?

Nonsense, horse mierda.
 
Nonsense. Just saying the words doesn't make it so, any more than your stupid story about spitting in the dude's face makes you racist. It's simple partisan hackery to pretend that everything the other side does that you don't like is "racism".

Nor were every single of the political decisions about race. I just listed some you would understand to be political, and since the Modern Leftist Hack today centers every thought on dividing the US into categories based on their melanin I thought you would relate.

Turtle head stole anSCOTUS pick from Obama


Trump only won because of foreign tampering


When did you begin to hate democracy?
 
The race card...never leave home without it.

Most Americans have moved on but the far left can't drop it. It's all and I do mean all they have left.

Elections have consequences, if Hillary had won the 2016 election, the court would be majority liberal. Would that make the court racist?

Nonsense, horse mierda.

Just what a racist would say
 
All due to white male racism


The right wing packed court is racist today too

Please explain how it's "All due to white male racism". TIA

Agreed SCOTUS is now stacked with RW activist judges just like the Republicans have been lying and cheating to do for years, but I disagree it's "racist". Racism is hatred. This is more like Elie Wiesel's "The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference." They just don't care.

Indifference to all poor is not racism. It's simply indifference.

Yes, even if a greater number of poor are one racial or religious grouping than another. US decisions are based upon the law and funding. Black letter law and a ledger that should be kept in the black. That's about as racist as it gets.
 
Turtle head stole anSCOTUS pick from Obama


Trump only won because of foreign tampering


When did you begin to hate democracy?

Saying stupid things does not make stupid real. Again same example. That stupid story about you spitting in the black man's face wasn't real, nor is saying that I hate democracy real.

The reality: Adding seats to the SCOTUS to make it more appealing to your partisan view would, quite literally and actually, be doing what you are trying to say other folks are doing. There is no other way to view it than that. Changing the SCOTUS so that it reflects only your partisan view is quite literally what you are saying should happen, and is quite literally and deliberately undermining the checks and balance system that exists. You will immediately and obviously have created a partisan court that will make decisions partisanly in your favor without regard to the constitution or law.

I get that you would like SCOTUS to always do what you demand they do, but that kind of action is a coup of one branch of our government, it is what fascists would do. You need to slow your roll and know your role and act responsibly as a citizen of this nation. (What am I saying? You've never demonstrated you are capable of that!) You need to stop trying to make the federal government reflect only your image, Desh. It's gross, it is flatly against the checks and balances, and it is what you are trying to accuse others of (as I said, if you want to know what the Leftist Hacks are doing, just listen to what they are accusing others of and you will know). I know that you won't hear any of this, but thankfully there are sane Democrats out there that will.

Remaking one branch of the government in your image deliberately, the one branch that is supposed to be less political and a safeguard against this kind of fascism, will quite literally make the government into what you lie and say you are trying to avoid.
 
Please explain how it's "All due to white male racism". TIA

Agreed SCOTUS is now stacked with RW activist judges just like the Republicans have been pushing to do for years, but I disagree it's "racist". Racism is hatred. This is more like Elie Wiesel's "The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference." They just don't care.

Indifference to all poor is not racism. It's simply indifference.

Back in the days he gave as example only white men had any power for the most part


And black Americans rights were not honestly protected by their decisions

Because of racism


So yes


White male racists


It’s just fact
 
So you deny what the entire American intel system found about Putin involvement in our elections


Damo really?

You are a stop the steal guy?
 
Back in the days he gave as example only white men had any power for the most part

And black Americans rights were not honestly protected by their decisions

Because of racism

So yes

White male racists

It’s just fact
Only in this little region of the world, not everywhere.

Everyone was a racist then. Even Lincoln. People don't have to agree with slavery to be racists. They don't have to be "white" either.

Haven't things changed a lot for the better since Lincoln's day?
 
Only in this little region of the world, not everywhere.

Everyone was a racist then. Even Lincoln. People don't have to agree with slavery to be racists. They don't have to be "white" either.

Haven't things changed a lot for the better since Lincoln's day?

Go back and read my post and the ost I was responding to

It will clear that all up for you
 
There's about a zillion. But Dred Scott would be one of them, Buck v Bell, Korematsu v United States, The Civil Rights cases in 1883 (which allowed racial discrimination regardless of 13th and 14th amendments), Plessy v Ferguson ("separate but equal")...

Pretending that in the past the SCOTUS has had some perfect individuality when they agree with you, but that they are terrible partisans when they don't is pretty much one of the most favorite of the Modern Political Hack's Passtimes...

Post 360
 
Not for Obama, but OK for Trump. McConnell says he'd confirm ...
May 29, 2019 — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., stated Tuesday that if a Supreme Court vacancy emerged next year, he would fill it.

Was this constitutionally sound?
 
Go back and read my post and the ost I was responding to

It will clear that all up for you

It doesn't change the fact Lincoln was racist just like other famous leaders of the time. None of that really changed until a hundred years later under LBJ.

Here we are 57 years later and the Democrats are still institutionalizing racism. WTF?

OTOH, you and I can readily agree that the Republicans, especially the Trumpians, are racist assholes.

Most however just don't care. They're too busy getting their piece of the American pie to give a fuck about what others are getting. It's like seeing a commercial about starving kids in Africa. Sad, but just because they don't care doesn't make them racists.
 
It doesn't change the fact Lincoln was racist just like other famous leaders of the time. None of that really changed until a hundred years later under LBJ.

Here we are 57 years later and the Democrats are still institutionalizing racism. WTF?

OTOH, you and I can readily agree that the Republicans, especially the Trumpians, are racist assholes.

Most however just don't care. They're too busy getting their piece of the American pie to give a fuck about what others are getting. It's like seeing a commercial about starving kids in Africa. Sad, but just because they don't care doesn't make them racists.

What does this have to do with what I said?
 
Mc con all


Cheated our system because he didn’t want a black president to choose another SCOTUS member



Racism Supreme
 
Back
Top