The very divisive president: Joe Biden has unleashed a wave of wokery

Duly elected my ass. Trump has his fingers all over his own investigation.


The U.S. intelligence community has concluded the Russian government orchestrated a sophisticated operation to meddle in the 2016 election and sow discord among the public. Top law enforcement and intelligence officials have said the Kremlin wanted Mr. Trump to win.
During the summer of 2016, Mr. Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, son-in-law Jared Kushner and son Donald Trump Jr. held a meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer who promised to have "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. Although he initially said the meeting was scheduled to discuss adoption policy, Trump Jr. later admitted he had expected damaging information on Clinton. The president has repeatedly denied having knowledge of the meeting.
"They wanted to hurt our democracy, hurt her and help him," former FBI Director James Comey said in his congressional testimony in 2017, referring to the president and Clinton.
Mueller did not conclude whether Trump's conduct constituted obstruction

Barr said Mueller did not "draw a conclusion" as to whether the president's conduct examined by his team constituted obstruction.
"The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion — one way or the other — as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction," the attorney general wrote. "Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as 'difficult issues' of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction."
Democrats have long insisted there is ample public evidence of Mr. Trump obstructing justice. They have pointed to a 2017 conversation between the president and then-FBI Director James Comey in which Mr. Trump asked Comey to "go easy" on Michael Flynn, his former national security adviser who later pleaded guilty to lying to investigators and agreed to cooperate with Mueller's probe.
Mr. Trump has also been accused of obstructing justice by firing Comey in May 2017. The president told NBC News he considered "this Russia thing" when he decided to fire the FBI director.
Report does not "exonerate" president — on obstruction of justice

Summarizing Mueller's report, Barr said the special counsel left "difficult issues" of "law and fact" about whether the president's "actions and intent" could be classified as obstruction "unresolved." According to Barr, Mueller stopped short of exonerating the president.
"While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Mueller wrote in his report, according to the attorney general.
Barr and Rosenstein — not Mueller — determined Trump had not committed obstruction of justice

Since Mueller did not make a conclusion on whether Mr. Trump committed obstruction of Justice, Barr said he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein determined, based on Mueller's findings and advice from Justice Department officials, that there was insufficient evidence to prove the president committed an obstruction offense.
"After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense," Barr wrote.
Barr and Rosenstein reached conclusion without considering Justice Department guideline not to indict sitting presidents

Barr said he and Rosenstein decided the president's actions did not amount to obstruction of justice without considering the longstanding Justice Department conclusion that presidents can't be indicted while in office.
"Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president," he wrote.

During his confirmation hearing, Barr told lawmakers he agreed with the longstanding Justice Department opinion.
Barr: Trump took "no actions" constituting "obstructive conduct"

Barr said he determined none of the president's actions detailed in Mueller's report proved "beyond a reasonable doubt" that Mr. Trump, with "corrupt intent," engaged in obstruction of justice.
"In cataloguing the President's actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department's principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of justice offense," the attorney general wrote, suggesting most of the actions probed by Mueller were already public.
Barr vows to release "as much" of report as consistent with law

After citing statutes and regulations that will make disclosing all of the report's contents extremely difficult, Barr wrote he was nevertheless committed to releasing "as much" of Mueller's findings as possible.
"As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter," he added. "For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel's report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies."
Barr said the timing of any release of information from the report will be dependent on Justice Department officials identifying which findings need to be redacted. House Democrats will likely seek to secure congressional testimony from both Barr and Mueller in the coming months, precipitating yet another standoff with the administration.
After Barr's summary was released, New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said he will be asking the attorney general to testify before Congress in "the near future."
In light of the very concerning discrepancies and final decision making at the Justice Department following the Special Counsel report, where Mueller did not exonerate the President, we will be calling Attorney General Barr in to testify before @HouseJudiciary in the near future.
— (((Rep. Nadler))) (@RepJerryNadler)
First published on March 24, 2019 / 6:44 PM





Copyright © 2021 CBS Interactive Inc. All rights reserved.

  • .

 
Little did anyone imagine that within such a short space of time, millions of Americans who committed the ‘crime’ of voting the wrong way would start to fear that the real threat is not the Biden administration being too close to China but America itself edging worryingly close to China’s authoritarian society.

I was trying to think of an adequate response to the bolded - but I'm really without speech.
 
Have you seen the intelligence that justifies anything more than some standby SWAT teams [which they already have] to stop another ‘insurrection’ by rioters armed mostly with selfie sticks?

You're still going w/ this?

The Capitol was NOT prepared for what happened on 1/6. They were 100% correct to take the precautions they did after that.

No one rational questions that.
 
You're still going w/ this?

The Capitol was NOT prepared for what happened on 1/6. They were 100% correct to take the precautions they did after that.

No one rational questions that.

I go with things till I get a good answer.

No, they weren’t prepared. Had they been prepared there would be no 1/6 to talk about and no re-peachment and no slurring Trump supporters as domestic terrorists.

One plausible explanation is that 1/6 was ‘out of character’ for Trump supporters, so they weren’t expecting it. Yet somehow, from there, we got to Trump supporters are potential domestic terrorists and need to be weeded out of society.

Btw, didn’t Madame Pelosi have something to do with the state of preparedness on 1/6?
 
Yep, America dodged a bullet on that one, Dotard wanted to be just like China and other dictators.

U.S. President Donald Trump praised Chinese President Xi Jinping Saturday after the ruling Communist party announced it was eliminating the two-term limit for the presidency, paving the way for Xi to serve indefinitely.

“He’s now president for life, president for life. And he’s great,” Trump said, according to audio of excerpts of Trump’s remarks at a closed-door fundraiser in Florida.
“And look, he was able to do that. I think it’s great. Maybe we’ll have to give that a shot someday,” Trump said to cheers and applause from supporters.

What Trump said about Putin: “If he says great things about me, I’m going to say great things about him. I’ve already said, he is really very much of a leader. I mean, you can say, ‘Oh, isn’t that a terrible thing’—the man has very strong control over a country".

"I think in terms of leadership, he's getting an A and our president is not doing so well," Trump said of al-Assad during an interview with Fox News in September.

"Assad's a bad guy, but they're all bad guys. We're supporting rebels. You know they talk about the Syria Free Rebels. We're supporting rebels. We don't even know who they are," Trump said.

"Kim Jong Un has been, really, somebody that I've gotten to know very well and respect, and hopefully -- and I really believe that, over a period of time, a lot of tremendous things will happen."
Kim wrote me beautiful letters and they're great letters. We fell in love."

PRES.MORON ANNOUNCED HIS FOREIGN POLICY THE OTHER DAY, AND WE CAN KISS ALL THE GAINS WE MADE UNDER TRUMP GOODBYE.


NO LONGER WILL THE EUROSLEAZE PAY THEIR SHARE OF THEIR OWN DEFENSE, AS BIDEN SAYS WE "HAVE TO EARN THEIR TRUST BACK" AS THOUGH A PRESIDENT FINALLY HAVING THE BALLS TO CALL THEM ON THEIR SCREWING AMERICA MUST BE APOLOGIZED FOR.


NO LONGER WILL WE HAVE THE GREATEST TRADE DEAL FOR AMERICA WITH CHINA IN OUR HISTORY, THE STAGE ONE DEAL BROUGHT ABOUT BY TRUMP'S HARDBALL WITH XI.
BIDEN WILL GRAB HIS ANKLES FOR HIS EMPLOYER, AS WELL AS FOR THE EUROSLEAZE.

THE FUCKING IDIOT PUT US BACK IN THE PARIS ACCORD, WHICH WE WILL PAY FOR, WHILE THE CHINESE AND INDIA ,THE WORLD'S WORST POLLUTERS, GET A TEN YEAR PASS.


AND THE MORON ALSO RE-UPPED US TO A NUKE DEAL WITH RUSSIA THAT THEY HAVE VIOLATED FROM DAY ONE, JUST LIKE THE TERRORIST FINANCING DEAL HE AND OBAMA MADE WITH IRAN.

HILARIOUS HEARING THE MORON TALK ABOUT "NOT ROLLING OVER FOR RUSSIA", WHEN HE AND OBAMA DID JUS THAT FOR YEARS, ALLOWING THEM CONTROL OF 20% OF OUR URANIUM RESERVES, ALLOWING ILLEGAL EXPORTS OF SAID URANIUM, RENEGING ON THE EUROPEAN MISSILE DEFENSE SHIELD, REFUSING TO ARM UKRAINE AGASINT RUSSIAN AGGRESSION, AND TELLING OUR INTEL TO "STAND DOWN", AND NOT INTERFERE WITH RUSSIAN ELECTION MEDDLING IN 2016, ALL TO MAKE "VLADIPOO" HAPPY.




ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.
 
I go with things till I get a good answer.

No, they weren’t prepared. Had they been prepared there would be no 1/6 to talk about and no re-peachment and no slurring Trump supporters as domestic terrorists.

One plausible explanation is that 1/6 was ‘out of character’ for Trump supporters, so they weren’t expecting it. Yet somehow, from there, we got to Trump supporters are potential domestic terrorists and need to be weeded out of society.

Btw, didn’t Madame Pelosi have something to do with the state of preparedness on 1/6?

Not all Trump supporters are domestic terrorists. Most most domestic terrorists are Trump supporters.

You've been watching too much Tucker.
 
Back
Top