I am fine with using U6(underemployment), as long as we use it for both. Comparing U6 for Biden and Obama with U3 for trump is meaningless.
I am fine with using U6(underemployment), as long as we use it for both. Comparing U6 for Biden and Obama with U3 for trump is meaningless.
Real unemployment has been above 20% for 16 years, and at 25% for 3 years. That's not a good economy, Walt. Tech is laying off, office space has high vacancy, and homelessness is big business. Our system is broken. There can be no solutions with guys like you denying these basic facts.I am fine with using U6(underemployment), as long as we use it for both. Comparing U6 for Biden and Obama with U3 for trump is meaningless.
Real unemployment has been above 20% for 16 years, and at 25% for 3 years. That's not a good economy, Walt. Tech is laying off, office space has high vacancy, and homelessness is big business. Our system is broken. There can be no solutions with guys like you denying these basic facts.
Facts just hate Russian stool tools like goat
The unemployment rate has been using the same statistics for a long time. Its value is to provide a quick and clear comparison to determine if the economy has picked up or dropped. The last time I looked it up they had 6 ways of measuring it. The one we use has been agreed to for a long time.
There is a high probability that war with Iran has been timed to coincide with the removal of Trump.
I feel another spanking for the West coming on....