I am admittedly brutal in my verbal assessment of fellow working class members who vote against our best economic interests .
But not resenting the Koch brother type oligarchs--not being a class warrior-- isn't the issue, Flash.
The issue is supporting their policies and candidates--both of which are flagrantly exploitive of the working class..
Working class whites don't like minorities, feminists, gays, foreigners, academics, atheists, and sophisticates.
And despite not being Native Americans themselves, they hate other immigrants as well.
And because of that, out of spite, they are willing to vote against the healthcare, educational opportunities, labor protections, and healthy environment that they desperately need. They're played by their own exploiters who prey on their fears and prejudices.
If they don't think that they need those things that progressive liberals support, then they're just too beaten down to be lucid anymore.
After all, it's not having had them that made them resentful to begin with.
Government polices that benefit one's economic interests is not what many voters want. It assumes the job of government is to provide people
with financial rewards. Also, many have become disillusioned with government efforts to reduce poverty and other social welfare policies because they have accomplished little, are wasteful, and much of the money goes to the "oligarchs" you complain about. Why should the working class support that?
I know working class people who are involved in these programs and complain not about the poor people getting these benefits but the rip-off of government taxes by those running the programs (example: ambulances taking people to doctor appointments). Education spending per pupil adjusted for inflation has increased significantly with no gain in performance or basic reading or math skills. I taught college for 40 years and watched students but mostly the college rip off taxpayers by milking the government for all the Pell Grant money it could get (but nothing illegal). Saying government spending ("investment") on education, the hungry, health care, etc. all sound like noble causes but many of them are inefficient and wasteful--you could cut them without hurting anybody.
Also, those who do like those programs see little difference in the parties since they both support and increase government funding. Democratic claims that Republicans want to cut Social Security are false in that most of that talk is simply rhetoric and many know some changes must be made to SS to keep it solvent. Some of those changes could involve cuts like President Obama's chained COLAs.
It was hard for the working class to see Democrats as working in their economic interests when Clinton was promising to put coal miners out of business. The working class has been voting Democratic for many years and any perceived "exploitation occurred under both parties (a rather outdated Marxist boogeyman).
"Working class whites don't like minorities, feminists, gays, foreigners, academics, atheists, and sophisticates." This is a bigoted and largely untrue generalization (and you forgot the media). And, it makes you guilty of the same type of hate of these people that you criticize them for.
Being brutal toward a working class white is no better than being brutal to gays, immigrants, etc. Hate is hate and should be redirected toward simple disagreement and debate. A person who believes certain government programs are wasteful and ineffective, whether they are right or wrong, does not mean they do not care about others.
You are being rational and basing your politics on issues, but that does not determine elections. It is emotion. Bush voters agreed more with Gore on issues but said Bush "shared their values." Factors such as income or education used to predict how a person would vote, but by 2000 the best predictor was "frequency of church attendance." Again, I do not share the values or most of the views of working class whites, but neither do I hate or show contempt for them and realize such an attitude makes their support for Trump stronger.