uscitizen
Villified User
Why do you assume it's either/or? You can be both.
Darn it Darla, you are straining the boys brain. remember he has one of those con brains.
This or that is all that is allowed.
Why do you assume it's either/or? You can be both.
So you're pro theocracy? OR just pro groups that espouse theocracy?
Why do you assume it's either/or? You can be both.
It's an american value to allow anti-freedom theocrats to establish bases of operations in our country?
LOL.
Of course it can. Especially if the first is true.
If you are pro theocracy there is a high likelihood, in fact a certainty that question 2 would also be true.
However if you only espoused the groups it is not as certain that you, yourself, were pro-theocracy.
Hmm our fine christian leader has backed the murder of women and children and made the murders immune to prosecution. ie Blackwater.
this should be a much bigger hit than whitewater, but considering the "liberal" media I doubt that it will.
It was funny. Liberals can't laugh at themselves.I don't give his accusations, which are thrown on this board the way a monkey flings poop around his cage in an attempt to rile and divert the subject to what HE wants to talk about, as much time as you do Damo.
It was funny. Liberals can't laugh at themselves.
No, you answered that it could be both, I found it funny as the question was did you do this thing that supports theocracy or that thing that supports theocracy then you thought you won because you said it could be both?Where did you get this claim from? Was AHZ making a joke, or was he doing his usual schtik of throwing out wild accusations in a desperate hope of driving the narrative?
No, you answered that it could be both, I found it funny as the question was did you do this thing that supports theocracy or that thing that supports theocracy then you thought you won because you said it could be both?
I'm sorry Darla, you didn't read the questions at all if you can't see what I thought was funny.
Yes. Yes it is.
It's a VERY American value actually. I say this as an Atheist.
Read up.
And I laughed then you acted all insulted. Hence my assertion that you were refusing to laugh at yourself. I had thought you had done it on purpose. Your reaction certainly implied otherwise.OMG, you really do have a head like a coconut! I know what he asked, and I knew what my answer implied. I answered that way to show that I do not take him seriously, his accusations are so meaningless that I can afford to say "yes, yes, that's right" to them.
See? I have no sense of humor, you have got to be kidding me. You on your funniest day should be as funny as I am on my least funny, flu-ridden, day.
No. No it's not. It's idiotic to think tolerance means we must tolerate intolerance of our own selves.
What exactly are you opposed to?
Laws that protect your right to worship any God you choose, or none?
If your religion does not infringe upon the rights of others, you can worship or not as you please. I'll take that over a theocracy anyday.
Islam does impinge on the rights of others. It's theocratic and does not ITSELF respect the concept of tolerance. It's gotta go.
Stop All Muslim Immigration!
And I laughed then you acted all insulted. Hence my assertion that you were refusing to laugh at yourself. I had thought you had done it on purpose. Your reaction certainly implied otherwise.
How does Islam "impinge" on the rights of others?
Do you have a right to see every woman with their hair uncovered? No.
Do you have a right to not be massacred as an unbeliever? Certainly.
2. to encroach; infringe (usually fol. by on or upon): to impinge on another's rights.
Decapitation for one. Big impingement.
Islam doesn't believe in one's right not to be massacred for unbelief. It has no place in civil society.
Do you actively fear decapitation in this country AssHat? Would your fear subside if we "banned" the religion?
I would be happy just banning further immigration of muslims. Ecstatic.
It's a gutter religion.