There is no tape of the senate approving 2020 election. why not?

[Flash]

what law are you talking about?

I thought you were talking about laws which you thought sanctuary cities were breaking.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

I thought you were talking about laws which you thought sanctuary cities were breaking.

yes immigration laws.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

The supreme court most certainly has the authority to interpret the constitution, that"s their fucking job asshole.

we all have the authority to interpret the consitution.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

The supreme court most certainly has the authority to interpret the constitution, that"s their fucking job asshole.

interpreting in good faith according to what words mean is one thing.

making up stuff and saying it's in their doesn't work for the people anymore tho.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

I thought you were talking about laws which you thought sanctuary cities were breaking.

but what law are you talking about?

 

[Trumpet]

interpreting in good faith according to what words mean is one thing.

making up stuff and saying it's in their doesn't work for the people anymore tho.

You are hallucinating again, which means that you need your meds.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

You are hallucinating again, which means that you need your meds.

show me the part of the constitution that covers abortion.

I'll wait.

 

[Supposn]

interpreting in good faith according to what words mean is one thing.
making up stuff and saying it's in their doesn't work for the people anymore tho.

AssHatZombie, you're determining which of the Supreme Court's decisions are, or aren't made in “good faith”; and who's going to pass judgment upon your decisions)? You're posting nonsense.

The U.S. Constitution can be amended, by the aggregate states of the USA, or by the aggregate states and (other than the judicial branch of) the U.S. federal government.

The U.S. judicial branch is bound by and empowered by the U.S. Constitution, to interpret any and all things, (which certainly includes legal matters) as related to cases that eventually come before our federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court is our nation's absolutely final legal court of appeals. Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

AssHatZombie, you're determining which of the Supreme Court's decisions are, or aren't made in “good faith”; and who's going to pass judgment upon your decisions)? You're posting nonsense.

The U.S. Constitution can be amended, by the aggregate states of the USA, or by the aggregate states and (other than the judicial branch of) the U.S. federal government.

The U.S. judicial branch is bound by and empowered by the U.S. Constitution, to interpret any and all things, (which certainly includes legal matters) as related to cases that eventually come before our federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court is our nation's absolutely final legal court of appeals. Respectfully, Supposn

I'll pass judgement on my decisions.

Free thought and speech isn't nonsense

 

[Yakuda]

What a shame that Trump fucked up his followers as much as he did. But in your case, he hit a grand-slam home run.

You poor, misguided dick head.

This from a Biden ass licker.

 

[Ross Dolan]

This from a Biden ass licker.

You poor misguided jerk-off!

 

[Into the Night]

No, you are as fucking stupid as Trump. Even though certification did happen

It didn't.

regardless of whether or not you can find a tape of it, Biden would still be president today even if they had hung Pence on Jan 6, it WAS just a formality.

Biden isn't President. He was installed as Chief Puppet. He was never elected.

You are an idiot if you think if trumps asshole had prevented certification that he would still be president, he would not.

There was no certification. There was no election. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

The supreme court most certainly has the authority to interpret the constitution, that"s their fucking job asshole.

WRONG. See Article III.

 

[Into the Night]

we all have the authority to interpret the consitution.

Sort of. The States have that authority, and through them, the people.

 

[Into the Night]

interpreting in good faith according to what words mean is one thing.

making up stuff and saying it's in their doesn't work for the people anymore tho.

That is changing the Constitution, and they can't legally do that either.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

That is changing the Constitution, and they can't legally do that either.

well, it's hallucination. not good either way.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

Sort of. The States have that authority, and through them, the people.

every individual can interpret the constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

AssHatZombie, you're determining which of the Supreme Court's decisions are, or aren't made in “good faith”; and who's going to pass judgment upon your decisions)? You're posting nonsense.

The Supreme Court MUST conform to the Constitution of the United States. They cannot interpret it or change it. ANY decision that attempts to interpret or change the Constitution is beyond it's authority.

The U.S. Constitution can be amended, by the aggregate states of the USA, or by the aggregate states and (other than the judicial branch of) the U.S. federal government.

WRONG. The U.S. Constitution can ONLY be amended by the States. The States own it. They created it. They are the only ones that can change it.

The U.S. judicial branch is bound by and empowered by the U.S. Constitution, to interpret any and all things, (which certainly includes legal matters) as related to cases that eventually come before our federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court is our nation's absolutely final legal court of appeals. Respectfully, Supposn

The Supreme Court has NO authority over the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

I'll pass judgement on my decisions.

Free thought and speech isn't nonsense

Quite right.

 

[Flash]

yes immigration laws.

That is what I thought. The point remains, it is not the obligation of state and local governments to enforce immigration laws. That is a federal responsibility.