There was no fraud. The election was perfect. SHUT UP.

Stringfellow Hawk said:
GA, PA, MI, WI and MN all stopped their processes, it was sickening that it was allowed. Voting rights should be federally mandated not at the state level. It was the most criminal election process in my lifetime
Click to expand...

I disagree that voting rights be federal. That goes against the constitution. The problem was when jurists legislated voter laws from the bench and overturned existing laws. ;)
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO... You do believe the stupidest shit.
What is the process for GA and when was it stopped?
What is the process for MI and when was it stopped?
What is the process for WI and when was it stopped?
What is the process for MN and when was it stopped?

The problem you have is you don't know the process for any of those states and you don't know how that process works.
MN and WI announced the winner and the ballot count within about 4 hours of polls closing. So how exactly did they stop their process since that is the same it is every election?
Click to expand...

It isn't.
 
Stringfellow Hawk said:
they are not regulated, the count process is not supposed to stop
Click to expand...

They are federally mandated.
The count is not being discussed here. Pivot fallacy.

State laws generally require counting to stop when no observers are present (typically after hours, when election offices are supposed to be closed for the day). Yes...counting stops, according to various State laws. The federal government has some authority over how a State conducts it's elections and how electors are chosen by a State. You really should read the Constitution of the United States and stop trying to pivot away to something else.
 
Truth Detector said:
I disagree that voting rights be federal. That goes against the constitution. The problem was when jurists legislated voter laws from the bench and overturned existing laws. ;)
Click to expand...

The Constitution of the United States discusses voting rights and procedures in Article I and II, and in the 10th, 12th, 14th, 15th, 17th, 19th, 22nd, 23rd, 24th, and 26th amendments. No court or jury has authority to change the Constitution.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The funny thing is not a single one of them was for voting for a dead person. And over 99% were for crimes that didn't involve even getting a ballot, let alone filling it out.
Click to expand...

Because voting for the dead is very difficult to prosecute.

Hilarious how libs do flips and twists trying to claim that cheating doesn't occur, with a mountain of evidence hovering over them.
 
Into the Night said:
They are federally mandated.
The count is not being discussed here. Pivot fallacy.

State laws generally require counting to stop when no observers are present (typically after hours, when election offices are supposed to be closed for the day). Yes...counting stops, according to various State laws. The federal government has some authority over how a State conducts it's elections and how electors are chosen by a State. You really should read the Constitution of the United States and stop trying to pivot away to something else.
Click to expand...

witten laws mean exactly dick, when not enforced
 
MAGA MAN said:
Because voting for the dead is very difficult to prosecute.

Hilarious how libs do flips and twists trying to claim that cheating doesn't occur, with a mountain of evidence hovering over them.
Click to expand...

The fact that they demand everyone say it and to shut up about it says a lot doesn't it? :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top