IBDaMann
Well-known member
Weaponizing weatherthe truth?
yes. regularly.
Weaponizing weatherthe truth?
yes. regularly.
I'm sure they have.Weaponizing weather
They have not.I'm sure they have.
Humans can't control the weather, so no such weapons have been, or are being, developed.it's best for amplifying existing patterns and not FULLY predictable as a first go to weapon.
I'm certain they've found that is useful for modification at the margins.They have not.
The DoD has investigated everything about weather that is possible, up to ensuring knowledge of future soil conditions for upcoming operations ... but no weather weapons because nobody can control the weather.
Humans can't control the weather, so no such weapons have been, or are being, developed.
When the day arrives that humans can control the weather, it will become an item in the Quadrennial Defense Review, at which point the Joint Staff will validate the capability, select an executive agent and authorize funding for the executive agent to pursue the capability in the Acquisition process.
We're not there yet.
You are mistaken. If the DoD discovered that it was possible and considered it useful, it would be implemented at one or more units and STRATCOM would include it in strategic plans.I'm certain they've found that is useful for modification at the margins.
I know how they work and I know what they don't have.you obviously don't know how they think.
I disagree.You are mistaken. If the DoD discovered that it was possible and considered it useful, it would be implemented at one or more units and STRATCOM would include it in strategic plans.
I know how they work and I know what they don't have.
look, a retard jacking itself off.Don't forget "Failure to unpack his crap":
* failure to explain this so-called "mathematical limit" of what Earth's atmosphere over this ocean water can produce
* failure to explain how this so-called "mathematical limit" was derived in the first place.
* failure to explain how "near" this hurricane is to said "mathematical limit"
* failure to explain how "near" all the other hurricanes have come to this so-called "mathematical limit" so we can compare this hurricane to the others.
With what part specifically?I disagree.
I did not make an argument. I refuted yours. What did I say that was in error?your logic is ultimately a tautological absurdity.
You turned into a random word generator.you're a deep state shill failing to be convincing in your denials.
I did not make an argument.
You didn't answer my questions.[no response]
you admitted you had no argument.You didn't answer my questions.
I expressed questions.you admitted you had no argument.
stupid ones. thanks.I expressed questions.
They were my questions. I would appreciate some answers. bottom line is you have no argument.stupid ones. thanks.
weather modification is old and well documented.They were my questions. I would appreciate some answers. bottom line is you have no argument.
The Lord of the Rings is old and well documented.weather modification is old and well documented.
YOur mother's vestigial scrotum is old and well documented.The Lord of the Rings is old and well documented.