Like most MAGAT CINOs, FatLame is fine with a fellow fake Xtian warping her Holy Book as long as it's in service to her #MalignantMessiah.

Like most MAGAT CINOs, FatLame is fine with a fellow fake Xtian warping her Holy Book as long as it's in service to her #MalignantMessiah.

^^^STALKER ALERT^^^
Apparently she has more names than that demon in the Bible. lol
![]()
Bowl games about to start. I probably will not be around for a while. Will try to sneak in during half-times and between games.I copied the initial exchange directly that is the basis for our disagreement but edit it as you want to see it and let me see.
It is a KJV of the Bible and the reviewer that I watched said he could find no alteration of the KJV in the Bible that Trump is selling. Anyone that depends on SOLELY ONE version of the Bible probably does not understand fully what it says. Bibles are interpreted by committee and if you look at multiple versions you will at times gain a better interpretation of a verse. The additional section that is in this Bible is on glossy color paper and is clearly not part of the KJV of the Scripture.So, as I said, it is called the "Trump Bible" because it is an adulterated version of the Scripture accepted as authentic by most Christian sects. You debated this and were, as always proven wrong. It's not surprising though that a cult member like yourself would have no problem with this -- as long as it's your #MaliciousMessiah peddling it.
I have a strong suspicion that it would be a completely different story if, say, Pres. Biden or Pres. Obama had hawked *their* own version of the Holy Book.
They always want others to prove to them their beliefs are wrong. Weird!And then when you ask an atheist what kind of evidence they're waiting to see, they either don't have an intelligible answer, or they say something that could be written off as hallucination, mental illness, coincidence, or delusion - like God writing their name in the sky, etc.
The other suspect constraint they place on theism is that it has to be one of the ancient bronze or iron age gods from the Near East, India, Greece, Rome, or the Norse people. They pretty much avoid more modern renditions of a rational higher power like the Deism of Thomas Jefferson, the god of Spinoza, the pantheism of Einstein.
Great point.
I see no conceivable prospect in the future that there will be adequate scientific explanations for the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the nature of consciousness. We still don't even really understand what gravity is at the level of fundamental reality 500 years after Isaac Newton.
So an over-confidence and over-reliance on the scientific experimental method supposedly being the source of all our knowledge is a seriously flawed worldview.
I got as much knowledge from the Tao Te Ching and the Dhammapada as I got from my physics and calculus college textbooks.
We can do without you.Bowl games about to start. I probably will not be around for a while. Will try to sneak in during half-times and between games.
I look forward to his return!We can do without you.
Good at least one person does.I look forward to his return!
I’m sure there are more than just one!Good at least one person does.
Why are you so afraid of merely posting the initial exchange which is the clear one i posted above where you demand i answer a question with one of three replies ONLY and i then i reply 'that is not sufficient for me... here is my reply' which you then claim is wrong.Better yet, you can supply the OP...and I given the opportunity to post my rendition of the conflict.
I'm not sure we can find an objective forum for this question. There will almost always be more atheists than people of my particular agnostic take. But I can live with that. I am saying that your response was a response, BUT NOT AN ANSWER TO MY QUESTION.
And if more people agree with your argument that it was an answer, than with mine (50% no need for 75%) I will acknowledge your win and leave JPP...with fond memories of everyone. (No obligation on your part to even acknowledge anything.)
Your response WAS NOT an answer to my question at all.
He has none. Every time Trump was asked about the bible, he had no answer. He did a song and dance, trying to cover up for his lack of knowledge about it. Any time he talked about religion, he was embarrassing. He is a user of people and girls. Is that religious? He makes the little people suffer. Is that religious? You throwing in with such a horrible person means you do not understand what Christianity is supposed to be.His faith is strong... For a number of reasons... That kind of faith is making a comeback in America these days....Take a look around... Those who have abandoned their religious beliefs may just want to take a second look....
You're wrong.. Not a bit of truth to what you just said . .but I understand why you feel that way... Just remember only 3 more years.And then you can complain about JD...He has none. Every time Trump was asked about the bible, he had no answer. He did a song and dance, trying to cover up for his lack of knowledge about it. Any time he talked about religion, he was embarrassing. He is a user of people and girls. Is that religious? He makes the little people suffer. Is that religious? You throwing in with such a horrible person means you do not understand what Christianity is supposed to be.
Great. But it is half time in the Oregon Texas Tech game...and here I am.We can do without you.
Then you are agnostic, not atheist.i don't hold a "belief" either way that a deity exists or not as i do not form such "beliefs" without evidence.
To say " i demand you form a belief on XYZ" whether it be gods, aliens or other when the person says he has no data points to do so, is simply absurd.
Before i form a BELIEF i want to see some evidence, one way or the other that leads me to a belief, and until then i will remain agnostic or open to being convinced in either direction.
Again to say you must be part of 'team believers' or 'team non believers' is fine for those who fit those two boxes but to DENY a third box can exist "I have not yet come to a point of any belief" ... is absurd.
How is Tech doingGreat. But it is half time in the Oregon Texas Tech game...and here I am.
Why are you so afraid of merely posting the initial exchange which is the clear one i posted above where you demand i answer a question with one of three replies ONLY and i then i reply 'that is not sufficient for me... here is my reply' which you then claim is wrong.
That is a clear cut question. Was i wrong or not to answer as i did.
We were not debating the OP nor anything else. This was about you saying i was wrong to reply as i did.
- You put out a clear question
- i gave my answer
- You said my answer was not appropriate (does not address the question)
- i maintain my answer was appropriate (does address the question)
That is it. The ENTIRETY of what we are arguing about and putting in the OP does not help clarify it.
Okay...But feel free to write the question that you think frames our debate and if i agree that is the one i will post in the forum you choose from the ones i present to you.
Not doing anything. Score is 6 - 0 Oregon. Stats heavily favor O.How is Tech doing
It's one thing for a right-wing Christian to hold their nose and reluctantly vote for a morally bankrupt sleazebag.He has none. Every time Trump was asked about the bible, he had no answer. He did a song and dance, trying to cover up for his lack of knowledge about it. Any time he talked about religion, he was embarrassing. He is a user of people and girls. Is that religious? He makes the little people suffer. Is that religious? You throwing in with such a horrible person means you do not understand what Christianity is supposed to be.
I usually give the fourth answer, "I do not care."That is so wrong-headed, it defies imagination.
Print this discussion out and take it to the nearest university to you...ask to speak with a professor of logic. explain to him that you are the QP...and then ask for an evaluation of your responses.
He/she will tell you that you are way, way out of your depth in the discussion.
Or don't.
Let us continue.
Here is a perfectly logical question:
Are there any gods involved in the REALITY of existence?
The answer is either a YES, NO, or I DO NOT KNOW.
You apparently are terrified of giving one of those answers.
Not sure why.
Give it another try.