Jake Starkey
Verified User
No, you are so wrong. You call bad good, up down, white black. You are walking down the road, not up it.You are so wrong...![]()
No, you are so wrong. You call bad good, up down, white black. You are walking down the road, not up it.You are so wrong...![]()
Absolutely not true....No, you are so wrong. You call bad good, up down, white black. You are walking down the road, not up it.
I am correct, you just posted more hair splitting, aka trivial objections.
He's doing what he does best: fooling himself.He once stated he has done nothing wrong, so he doesn’t need God’s forgiveness.
Which explains why he didn't touch the Bible when he was sworn in this year. He did so his first term, but not the second. What changed?I am surprised that when he touches a Bible it doesn't leave third degree burns!
Many Christian organizations give out bibles for free. The Gideons dedicated themselves to that.Didn't take him long to make $$$ off selling his own version, did it? I wonder how many of our MAGATs here forked out $60 for their very own copy of the Trump-approved Revised version? lol
Yes on mammon-worshiping. As their Pedo King does, all MAGAts follow.Faith in what? Material wealth?
He didn’t want it to burst into flames?Which explains why he didn't touch the Bible when he was sworn in this year. He did so his first term, but not the second. What changed?
![]()
Trump doesn't place hand on Bible during swearing-in
President Donald Trump didn't place his hand on the Bible as he took the oath of office on Monday.abcnews.go.com
Agreed....not to mention a truncated Constitution.Many Christian organizations give out bibles for free. The Gideons dedicated themselves to that.
It takes someone like the noted atheist Trump to decide he wants to profit off of Jesus, Paul, and Moses.
That's my guess. Maybe his NDE with COVID caused him to reflect upon half a century of horrific sins....not that it seems to have affected his behavior this year.He didn’t want it to burst into flames?
Sticking an American political document in the Bible was poor taste.Agreed....not to mention a truncated Constitution.
it's like simp university.What is the "P###Y posse"?
He didn’t want it to burst into flames?
noahidism.Faith in what? Not God or religion.
Tell us what church he went to historically or goes to since he discovered his "comeback faith" if you believe that?
Tell us what faith tells you to "hate others" as he told Erica Kirk at the funeral or what faith expresses that believers have not a single sin to ask forgiveness for?
What type of "faith comeback" does Trump represent?
Agreed, much less cutting out the 11th through 27th Amendments. He appears to have been throwing red meat to the White Nationalists who advocate "restoring" the Constitution.Sticking an American political document in the Bible was poor taste.
You're so kind to give the nosey, needy, lonely shut-in so much attention. You're definitely going to Heaven. lolWhy are you so shy about defining heaven?
they're not interested in this.There is another alternative to what you suggested in your last paragraph, QP...and it has terrific advantages over what you propose. And that is not to use the descriptor...but rather to actually write out your position on the matter in clear language. That not only eliminates the problem with the multiple definitions...it eliminates the problem of misrepresenting one's position.
Here, once again, is mine:
I do not know if any GOD (or gods) exist or not;
I see no reason to suspect that gods cannot exist…that the existence of a GOD or gods is impossible;
I see no reason to suspect that at least one GOD must exist...that the existence of at least one GOD is needed to explain existence;
I do not see enough unambiguous evidence upon which to base a meaningful guess in either direction on whether any gods exist or not...nor do I see enough unambiguous evidence upon which to base a meaningful guess about which is more likely…so I do not guess on either of those things.
(When I use the word "GOD or gods" here, I mean "The entity (or entities) responsible for the creation of what we humans call 'the physical universe'...IF SUCH AN ENTITY OR ENTITIES ACTUALLY EXIST.)
Most people reading that would deem it an agnostic position. But at least one of the "definitions" of "atheist" would cause some people to call it an atheistic position. The word, as a descriptor, is useless.
So I would ask you two questions:
1) How do you describe your position on the issue?
2) What, specifically, do you disagree with about mine?