evince
Truthmatters
Both are crimes idiot
Thomas sold property to his rich buddy
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Both are crimes idiot
Lao Tse
Verified User
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Thomas sold property to his rich buddy?
Basically, Thomas sold his ass and all his past and future votes to his rich REPUBLICAN BUDDY!
Thomas is nothing more that a political Prostitute now- willing to jump into bed with anyone for money!
No different than Donald Trump! CORRUPTION CREEPS!
Basically, Thomas sold his ass and all his past and future votes to his rich REPUBLICAN BUDDY!
Thomas is nothing more that a political Prostitute now- willing to jump into bed with anyone for money!
No different than Donald Trump! CORRUPTION CREEPS!
evince
Truthmatters
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not a lawyer and I don't know but all crimes should be prosecuted. Abusing one's office is a crime. Abusing it for profit is a crime too.
Why do you think some crimes should be dismissed because of the political affiliation of the defendant?
Lao Tse
Verified User
which is worse, minor tax evasion, or congressional insider trading?
which is worse for the country?
take a stand, you worm.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Have a nice day, Patsy.IMA A BIGOT
IMA JEW-HATING SCUMBAG
KILL ALL JEW BABIES
Lao Tse
Verified User
It is not minor. He is on the Supremes. That besmirched the reputation of one of the 3 branches of government. He has made the respect of the court plummet.He is doing severe damage to Americal. Why do you deflect? You know what the problem is.
This is hardly minor tax evasion. And it’s not a first for Thomas. He is also required to disclose his wife’s sources of income, although not the amounts. When filing, he entered “NONE” fir his wife’s sources, even though she had income from several conservative sources.
Couple his lack of disclosure on this real estate deal WITH THE SAME GUY who paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of vacations, you’ve got a real ethics problem on a Supreme Court justice, no less. One who rules on cases involving his wife’s interests.
Too boot. His court has no ethical conduct standards. Crazy
Couple his lack of disclosure on this real estate deal WITH THE SAME GUY who paid for hundreds of thousands of dollars of vacations, you’ve got a real ethics problem on a Supreme Court justice, no less. One who rules on cases involving his wife’s interests.
Too boot. His court has no ethical conduct standards. Crazy
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Don't fall for the same bullshit grooming as JPP's wannabe terrorists.
The fact remains there is mounting evidence that Thomas was on the take. I think all such corruption should be stopped. It doesn't matter to me if it's Hillary, Trump or anyone else in D.C.
Wrong is wrong and should be treated as such. JPP members who believe two wrongs make a right are brain-damaged or malicious. Anyone trying to justify Thomas's actions while claiming they want to "drain the swamp" are idiots or liars.
Lao Tse
Verified User
Disagreed, Bigot Boy. Good luck with your patsy grooming.
Will you see it coming?
you're out of gas, boomer.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Time will tell, Fredo.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Sooooo....according to you, a little corruption is okay? When does a little corruption become big enough to count?
I dont know that Clarence Thomas took a cent of the sale money.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Yet you think it's "small potatoes". Does that mean you believe it shouldn't be investigated?
What should be done if Thomas was taking bribes?
If the property was worth what it was sold for then there is no chance that it was a bribe. Harass Clarence if you must but there is zero chance this is anything but a find an excuse to impeach Clarence Thomas issue.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
The fact you've prejudged this is interesting, #10. First you say it's "small potatoes" and now you claim it's harassment to investigate the multiple counts of malfeasance on the part of Thomas.
Be honest, if it was Sotomayor, you'd be asking for her resignation, amirite? It'd be "big potatoes"? Righteous to investigate?