Time to Revisit the Legalized Murder Travesty

PostmodernProphet said:
the same way government pays for everything it does......
Click to expand...

I gave you a better idea! Again, which organized crusade do you promote and belong to that's endeavoring to amend the Constitution so y'all rightwingers can prosecute the abortion guilty? After all, doesn't America need more laws and more criminals and punish sinners and do God's work for him?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yeah, you said it......but you proved it a lie when you said you supported the right to abortion.......you're just another baby killer.....the only difference is you lie about it.....
Click to expand...

Actually I support the Constitutional rule of law, not the absurd non-right to kill children. Like I said from the get-go, loyalty to the Constitution requires an amendment to protect the lives of the unborn. Until y'all rightwing authoritarians can manage that, I prefer that the abortion issue be left up to the God of all creation.

As usual y'all righties don't know the difference between a lie and constitutional rule of law loyalty. You assume you have the right of God's authority infiltrated into human governance. The problem with that is humans are not Gods and they're always better off when they mind their own business and render unto Cesar that which is Cesar's and unto God that which is God's.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
may I make a suggestion?......how about less incompetence instead.......we can start with your arguments......
Click to expand...

Your suggestion is laughable! The Bigger the government the greater the incompetence. You're promoting MORE/BIGGER government and wishing for lesser incompetence. That's an oxymoron, or just plain moronic.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I've done it a few times.....I see no reason to waste my time educating the fucking idiots who hang around this board once again.....educate yourself, then stfu.....
Click to expand...

As I suspected, you post a fucking rightwing lie and can't back it up. Funny fellow!



well let's stop and think about that a minute shall we?.......once parental rights are terminated the child can be put up for adoption......parental rights can be terminated without delay with the consent of the parent.......if the child had not been put up for adoption, then the parent is obviously contesting the termination of parental rights......with me so far?......now how many parents would contest the termination for an unwanted child........>snap<.........
Click to expand...

Nice try, but again laughable! You contend that "there's no such thing as an unwanted child" And you try to prove by saying that every child would be adopted if parents would consent to releasing their parental rights. I ask you again, produce the statistics from a reliable source that would be the case. Prove that every child raised in an orphanage to adulthood was there because parental consent was not terminated.

Furthermore, if it's really true that there's no such thing as an unwanted child as righties claim, righties would be major donors to homes for unwed mothers and standing in line to adopt children and the motivation for that is as plain as the nose on your face. Of course that's not the case and it's proven with this thread. Nary a rightie arguing here claims either.
 
BTW, to further refute the rightwing lie that "there's no such thing as an unwanted child," I knew a man who was raised to adulthood in an orphanage who's mother died at birth and his father was never known. There was no "parental rights" issue.

I also knew another man who claimed that his parents abandoned him as a pre-teen. He claimed he managed to survive by sleeping in bus stations and under people's porches and begging for food into his adulthood and was able to get a job. Who "wanted" that child?
 
Robo said:
Explain "trying to kill the child."
Click to expand...

seeking an abortion.....

The abortion doctor is surely guilty of premeditated murder, so it's a capital case and the death sentence is in order, don't you Think?
Click to expand...
no, I don't support the death penalty like you do.....or do you only support it for those who couldn't possibly have committed a crime other than their existence in the womb......
 
Robo said:
Your suggestion is laughable! The Bigger the government the greater the incompetence. You're promoting MORE/BIGGER government and wishing for lesser incompetence. That's an oxymoron, or just plain moronic.
Click to expand...

I don't understand why you claim wanting the government to be more competent is promoting it to be bigger when you claim to believe a smaller government is more competent......it is illogical.....
 
Robo said:
I also knew another man who claimed that his parents abandoned him as a pre-teen. He claimed he managed to survive by sleeping in bus stations and under people's porches and begging for food into his adulthood and was able to get a job. Who "wanted" that child?
Click to expand...

why didn't his parents put him up for adoption when he was born?......was it because he was unwanted?.....
 
Robo said:
Furthermore, if it's really true that there's no such thing as an unwanted child as righties claim, righties would be major donors to homes for unwed mothers and standing in line to adopt children and the motivation for that is as plain as the nose on your face. Of course that's not the case and it's proven with this thread. Nary a rightie arguing here claims either.
Click to expand...

why do you deny that we support homes for unwed mothers or stand in line for adoptions....are you unaware of reality?.....in our church of 150 families there are over 20 adopted children......
 
Robo said:
BTW, to further refute the rightwing lie that "there's no such thing as an unwanted child," I knew a man who was raised to adulthood in an orphanage who's mother died at birth and his father was never known. There was no "parental rights" issue.
Click to expand...

in that instance I expect you are lying...even if he was born back in the 50s there would have been a long waiting line for an infant adoption......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
seeking an abortion.....


no, I don't support the death penalty like you do.....or do you only support it for those who couldn't possibly have committed a crime other than their existence in the womb......
Click to expand...

So the male is only culpable if he personally seeks the abortion, right? Why would he seek an abortion when males can't get pregnant? Where's your 14th amendment's "equal protection" of the law?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
.....


no, I don't support the death penalty like you do.....or do you only support it for those who couldn't possibly have committed a crime other than their existence in the womb......
Click to expand...

I don't support the death penalty, I leave death penalties for killings up to the God of all creation.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I don't understand why you claim wanting the government to be more competent is promoting it to be bigger when you claim to believe a smaller government is more competent......it is illogical.....
Click to expand...

That's not the issue you invented, You want the government to get BIGGER and thereby become more incompetent. Your BIGGER government comes before your desire for more competency in government. Competence in government is not BIGGER government. The idea is leftwing absurdity and moronic. But I suppose in that regard you agree with the left's absurdity that the opposite is true, huh? Of course you do! You're a BIG government kinda rightie, AKA a Neo-Con/RINO.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why didn't his parents put him up for adoption when he was born?......was it because he was unwanted?.....
Click to expand...

You'd have to ask him but he's now dead. I would suppose the parents abandonment was because they thought he was worthless and a burden to them, what do you think? Who do you claim wanted him?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yet you are willing to let them take life at a whim.....
Click to expand...

You'll of course present my quote proving I ever said any such thing, right? I'll understand if you don't!

Again I support the constitutional rule of law and it's right of the people to amend it. Again, what crusade do you belong to who's agenda is amending the Constitution to protect the lives of the unborn? I'll understand if you ignore that question, again!
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why do you deny that we support homes for unwed mothers or stand in line for adoptions....are you unaware of reality?.....in our church of 150 families there are over 20 adopted children......
Click to expand...

When did I "deny" any such thing? I simply ask the question if you did and thus far your post here is the very first on this thread to claim you do. Does your church teach you to lie?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
in that instance I expect you are lying...even if he was born back in the 50s there would have been a long waiting line for an infant adoption......
Click to expand...

You can call me a liar if you like, I'm only repeating what the man himself told me. The conversation wasn't even about his not being adopted it didn't seem to matter to him enough to even mention it. He simply related that his mother died at birth and nobody knew who his father was. He simply related to me that he was raised in the orphanage until he was of age to get a job and become self supporting. As I understood that, I understood that nobody cared enough for him to adopt him.

You can believe whatever you want, I couldn't care less. I'm simply debating in opposition to the rightwing lie that "there's no such thing as an unwanted child." I'll wait for your evidence to prove your lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top