Top 8 (yes... 8) Board assholes, OFFICIAL RESULTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Thread starter BRUTALITOPS
- Start date
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
of course not....it was an embarrassment.....
The embarrassing thing is your attempt at humor.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
???.....I wasn't attempting humor.......
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I just want to extend a flourish and a "fuck you" to everyone who made the Top 8. Also, IHA, you piece of shit, i hope you die.
A flourish? What a fucking faggot you are.
I hope your colostomy bag bursts while you are standing in line for your unemployment check
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
I have to amend my statements. Since Dante's is asking nay begging for it, the fisting she is receiving can't be construed as rape. It is just her choice.
I hope she gets an abortion by Kermit Gosnell
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
This board has become so fixated on child porn, that is has been completely overlooked that all porn is against the rules. Please read rule 12 in its entirety.
There is no argument that ILA is NOT in violation of this rule.
12. No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification. It should be particularly attended to, to avoid any and all mention of descriptive encounters with children. It is unacceptable to bring that onto the board in any context. Do not suggest encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child.
There is no argument that ILA is NOT in violation of this rule.
12. No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification. It should be particularly attended to, to avoid any and all mention of descriptive encounters with children. It is unacceptable to bring that onto the board in any context. Do not suggest encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child.
Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
Shut up asshole!
50 percent didn't work for it. Lol
You need to invest, you sound butthurt
christiefan915
Catalyst
He's off his game.
evince
Truthmatters
beefy how you doing.
Um dude your republican brothers have cheated their asses off and its all in the court records.
why do you pretend lal those court cases in which the courts HAD TO STOP the republican party from cheating don't exist?
see what a corporate media can do to fuck your brain up with non facts?
evince
Truthmatters
http://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/republican-party-ohio-v-secretary-brunner
Republican Party of Ohio v. Secretary Brunner
October 13, 2008|
Restricting the Vote,
Voting Rights & Elections
In Brief – On October 17, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a stay in this case. Click here to download the ruling.
In Republican Party of Ohio v. Brunner, the Ohio Republican Party sued Ohio's Secretary of State, alleging that various policies adopted by the Secretary, Ohio's chief election officer, violated federal and state law. Among the claims was that Ohio was not in compliance with provisions of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA") which require states to attempt to "match" information provided by citizens who apply to register to vote with the motor vehicle and Social Security databases.
Plaintiffs filed their complaint on September 26, 2008 and, on October 5th, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") as to their HAVA compliance claim. After briefing and a hearing, the district court granted the motion for TRO on October 9th, and the Secretary immediately filed an emergency motion for a stay of the TRO order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit, supporting the request for a stay. The brief explained that plaintiffs were wrong to argue that HAVA required registration applicants to be successfully matched before they could be deemed eligible to vote. On October 9th, the Sixth Circuit granted the motion for a stay. Less than a week later, however, the full Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, vacated the stay and restored the district court's TRO.
The Secretary of State responded to the en banc opinion by issuing a statement stating that it is "imperative that voters not be disenfranchised because of federal government red tape, misstated technical information or glitches in databases beyond the control of voters . . . ", and promptly sought review from the U.S. Supreme Court.
On October 17, 2008, the Supreme Court vacated the TRO, protecting hundreds of thousands of Ohio citizens from disenfranchisement-by-typo.
Republican Party of Ohio v. Secretary Brunner
October 13, 2008|
Restricting the Vote,
Voting Rights & Elections
In Brief – On October 17, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a stay in this case. Click here to download the ruling.
In Republican Party of Ohio v. Brunner, the Ohio Republican Party sued Ohio's Secretary of State, alleging that various policies adopted by the Secretary, Ohio's chief election officer, violated federal and state law. Among the claims was that Ohio was not in compliance with provisions of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA") which require states to attempt to "match" information provided by citizens who apply to register to vote with the motor vehicle and Social Security databases.
Plaintiffs filed their complaint on September 26, 2008 and, on October 5th, filed a motion for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") as to their HAVA compliance claim. After briefing and a hearing, the district court granted the motion for TRO on October 9th, and the Secretary immediately filed an emergency motion for a stay of the TRO order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
The Brennan Center filed an amicus brief in the Sixth Circuit, supporting the request for a stay. The brief explained that plaintiffs were wrong to argue that HAVA required registration applicants to be successfully matched before they could be deemed eligible to vote. On October 9th, the Sixth Circuit granted the motion for a stay. Less than a week later, however, the full Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, vacated the stay and restored the district court's TRO.
The Secretary of State responded to the en banc opinion by issuing a statement stating that it is "imperative that voters not be disenfranchised because of federal government red tape, misstated technical information or glitches in databases beyond the control of voters . . . ", and promptly sought review from the U.S. Supreme Court.
On October 17, 2008, the Supreme Court vacated the TRO, protecting hundreds of thousands of Ohio citizens from disenfranchisement-by-typo.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
game... set... match...
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
you're welcome
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
evince
Truthmatters
When referring to Boris The Animal, remember folks...
IT'S JUST BORIS!
Its just boring
Yet here you are...
Boris The Animal
It's Just Boris!
Talking about yourself again, you Communist beyatch asswipe???