Trump Administration moves to end legal marijuana.

you really are trying too hard.

everyone already agreed with my premise. I can improve potency within a strain by selective breeding. sorry it offends you to be wrong.

Why won't you just answer the question? What determines plant characteristics?

While you're at it, please tell me exactly where I have been wrong. Please be specific and detailed.
 
bad move by Sessions..I don't thnk it matters all that much to users , but it does to growers and MJ shops.
It just makes it more difficult to do business and bank

sessions is going after pot and clinton walks,it is past time for mr sessions to go.i thank there are more then a few republicans that thank this is 1994,well it is not and mr sessions needs to go.
 
Thanks for proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are full of shit.

Cut him some slack, he's frantically searching the pages of high times for pot growing "expertise". It's not easy to fake decades of actual experience.
 
Yes that is obvious.
I am talking about seedless.
The longer the plant is unfertilized the more the bud grows and produced stonger and stickier terpenes and resins, which...wait for it...improve potency.
Yes, but if it does go to seed, it can still be very potent, it may not be the desired potency. It is, the strain that dictates whether the plant will be 16% or 31% when grown in optimum conditions. You can not take a strain that is only 16% and make it 31%. That is what I am arguing. That is what country is arguing.
 
Yes, but if it does go to seed, it can still be very potent, it may not be the desired potency. It is, the strain that dictates whether the plant will be 16% or 31% when grown in optimum conditions. You can not take a strain that is only 16% and make it 31%. That is what I am arguing. That is what country is arguing.

now you are flat out lying.

Both you and Country boy said that has no bearing.

You said it makes it easier to clean, and that is all.

liar said:
No, the potency is still the same, it just develops seeds. Seeds are a pain, they pop and are harsh, like stems and shake.
 
wow, you are arrogant. all the strains we have today likely originated from one

so maybe 100 years isn't enough, but given enough time you are the one that is wrong.

1. you are one to talk, blowhard.
2. My answer was direct,
yours introduced a diverson as well as not answering the question.

3. LMFAO
Are you even aware that there are 3 distinct subspecies of pot?
That they grow all over the world?
That pot has evolved as long as humans have used it?
Selective breeding is an ancient science.

4. If you apologize to Rana I MIGHT take uou seriously in the future.
Until then you are just anothet wanker to be fucked with.
 
Do a little research old friend.
Rune, I grow, and I choose strains for their characteristics. Some are low THC and some are high THC. I know what I am talking about. A bad crop of Girl Scout Cookie with seeds is going to be better than a crop of seedless dirt weed.

I know now a strain of weed can be more potent or less potent due to growing conditions, but I also know that the strain has a great deal to do with the characteristics of the weed.
 
1. you are one to talk, blowhard.
2. My answer was direct,
yours introduced a diverson as well as not answering the question.

3. LMFAO
Are you even aware that there are 3 distinct subspecies of pot?
That they grow all over the world?
That pot has evolved as long as humans have used it?
Selective breeding is an ancient science.

4. If you apologize to Rana I MIGHT take uou seriously in the future.
Until then you are just anothet wanker to be fucked with.

apologize to the person lying?

fuck no
 
Nah, all that term means is, no seeds. Literally, in Spanish.

Back in my younger daze I did a lot of experimentation with selective breeding. If you are very careful, you can take a small portion of a plant, and pollinate just a few flowers to perpetuate your breeding program without seeding your entire crop. Now, of course when you harvest those seeds, you're not just going to throw that weed away. I never experienced any discernable difference in potency between seeded buds and seedless.

That just proves your methodology was subpar.
Sorry.
I suggest further research.
 
Rune, I grow, and I choose strains for their characteristics. Some are low THC and some are high THC. I know what I am talking about. A bad crop of Girl Scout Cookie with seeds is going to be better than a crop of seedless dirt weed.

I know now a strain of weed can be more potent or less potent due to growing conditions, but I also know that the strain has a great deal to do with the characteristics of the weed.

did you know what you were saying when you said this?

No, the potency is still the same, it just develops seeds. Seeds are a pain, they pop and are harsh, like stems and shake.

or this?
Yes, but if it does go to seed, it can still be very potent, it may not be the desired potency.
 
Yes, but if it does go to seed, it can still be very potent, it may not be the desired potency. It is, the strain that dictates whether the plant will be 16% or 31% when grown in optimum conditions. You can not take a strain that is only 16% and make it 31%. That is what I am arguing. That is what country is arguing.

I've even seen some argue that because the plant actually has some seed to protect ... it will produce more cannabinoids.
 
You are more wrong though plus you are a rude little piker.
Why don't you fuck off?

haha.

the mod that you seem so motivated to defend just got her ass handed to her. you do realize that right. she is now arguing both sides of the same thing.
 
Back
Top