Trump demands termination of the Constitution

Disagreed. Rewriting in the current toxic political atmosphere, yes. The last Amendment was ratified in 1992.

IMO, the US is in transition after the Cold War and (hopefully) has bottomed-out and will start ascending again with a functional government that puts duty before political party.

We are so split nobody is going to want a constitutional convention unless they think their side will control it. They could start out with a few amendments. The 1992 amendment was basically obsolete by the time it was ratified.

What amendment(s) do you think Dems and Reps would support (or want)?
 
I've no love for Hunter Biden, but if there were pornographic tweets featuring him I fully support them being removed.

I don't exactly spend a lot of time on Twitter, but on the odd occasion I visit that site the last thing I would want to see is him going balls deep into some hooker while someone sticks a crack pipe up his ass.

I don't know of a social media platform which doesn't exercise some sort of regulation with regards to such things.

And, with that said, I also think Trump's idea is completely nuts...
 
I supply information. you just say opposites. I really do feel sorry for you. You cannot even understand that. I see why you are a Trumpy. You believe 100 percent without a doubt in what the right tells you.

You are not supplying anything. You are just denying.
 
Agreed. The Democrats push rewriting the Constitution through legal means. Trump is the first President to call for terminating it.

Those who support Trump in doing so are anti-American.

Democrats deny and discard the Constitution.
Trump never called for terminating it. You are hallucinating again.
 
We are so split nobody is going to want a constitutional convention unless they think their side will control it. They could start out with a few amendments. The 1992 amendment was basically obsolete by the time it was ratified.

What amendment(s) do you think Dems and Reps would support (or want)?

In today's toxic environment? None. That's not the way it's always been and that's not the way it will eventually be. It's this transition period that's bumpy.

Our national debt is rising, but neither party prioritizes it. Our immigration policies need to be rewritten, but neither party is prioritizing it. Our citizenry is increasingly disaffected, but neither party wants to prioritize uniting them.
 
So Trump's desire to terminate it is stupid and unnecessary?

Trump tried to discard it in the 2020 election but failed. The Constitution kept Trump from taking illegal actions both during his administration (executive orders) and during the counting of electoral votes. Pence followed the Constitution.

Trump does not desire to terminate the Constitution.
He did not discard it in 2020. There was no election in 2020. There was no electoral college. Pence violated the Constitution. He does NOT have authority to choose the electors for any State.
 
There is no such thing as "Trump's Truth." He has fooled his supporters into believing his lies that he doesn't even believe--they are just bait.

There certainly is a "Trump's Truth". It is the reality used by Trump.
The lies are yours. You don't get away with projecting YOUR problems on Trump or anybody else.
 
True. And on this topic, has Lefty produced any sort of argument lately? All I've seen from Lefty lately is that he's been programmed with a new word ("traitor").

Lefty is currently on tilt, but you are right. I have never seen him present an argument. His style is to post insults, post random shit, then deny he posted it. Dutch's style is just to throw a bunch of insults and hallucinate about this imaginary friend (enemy?) called Sybil, and to call everyone a 'sock'.
 
The signature link you and your "friends" share, allegedly moderated by the "three" of you.

Sybil does not exist on that forum. Sybil has not links pointing to anywhere. Sybil does not exist on this forum.

My signature link points to a forum and various references, not a manifesto. Gfm7175's link also happens to point there. That doesn't make anyone a sock, Dutch. Of course, to you, everyone is a sock.
 
Last edited:
Sybil does not exist on that forum. Sybil has not links pointing to anywhere. Sybil does not exist on this forum.

My signature link points to a forum and various references, not a manifesto. Gfm7175's link also happens to point there. That doesn't make anyone a sock, Dutch. Of course, to you, everyone is a sock.

Your reaction is outside the normal parameters, Sybil. Jus' sayin'. :thup:
 
In today's toxic environment? None. That's not the way it's always been and that's not the way it will eventually be. It's this transition period that's bumpy.

Our national debt is rising, but neither party prioritizes it. Our immigration policies need to be rewritten, but neither party is prioritizing it. Our citizenry is increasingly disaffected, but neither party wants to prioritize uniting them.

What amendment(s) would you support if possible?
 
Back
Top