Buckly J. Ewer
Racism Whistleblower
works for me.....why was it you objected again?......
So why do we need special IDs to vote in states controlled by repiglicon legislatures?
works for me.....why was it you objected again?......
So why do we need special IDs to vote in states controlled by repiglicon legislatures?
because the idiots in states controlled by Democratic legislatures WANT people who aren't here legally to be able to vote...........
So you say ... Can you cite an example?
????....you just told me Democratic states don't require photo IDs and you want me to give YOU an example?......
post 81.....you said IDs were only required in states run by Republicans.......I never said that ... quote me liar...
post 81.....you said IDs were only required in states run by Republicans.......
Show in the quote the word " only" ...liar.
lol....not until you sober up.....
Why can't you bring yourself to call out the well known racist Chopped Liver as a racist. Why do you apologize for him and protect him?
Keep this up and you may be getting a nasty gram from one of the mods for self moderation.
fairus = thinly-veiled white supremacists.
FAIR has been criticized for accepting contributions from the Pioneer Fund. Between 1982 and 1994, FAIR received $1.2 million from the foundation.[SUP][27][/SUP] The Pioneer Fund focuses on projects it perceives will not be easily funded because of controversial, racial, or pro-eugenics subject matter.[SUP][10][/SUP] The Pioneer Fund was described by the Sunday Telegraph as a "neo-Nazi organization closely integrated with the far right in American politics" in 1989
ILA mentioned amnesty with 25 years of not being able to vote. Therefore, people here LEGALLY would not be able to vote. Please try to keep up, I know it's difficult for you, but the Lord helps those who help themselves or something.
So you say ... Can you cite an example?
What you're actually asking is "Does any serious American politician believe in fascism?", which was hot consideration among the American Left in the 1920s to 1930s as an attractive alternative in the socialism vs. capitalism debate. It was discussed under the reasonable sounding heading of "The Third Way."
Today's American Left has retooled fascism and removed its less savory elements; militarism, nationalism, imperialism, and police statism. But at its core, fascism remains an economic system, like socialism and capitalism. The American Left has managed to establish the perception that fascism is defined by those less savory elements and not its economic mechanizations. So today's American Left openly advocates fascism.
Government regulations and costly lawsuits mean that the established lords of any industry will remain so and not be replaced by newcomers. How difficult is it to start a new oil company, tobacco company, drug company, etc.? The regulatory fees and lawsuit payouts are cost-effective to the lords of industry because the regulations will manage to also kill any infant competition in the cradle. Only the established lords may absorb the government driven costs and survive.
In a truly capitalist society, the free market picks the winners and losers in a constantly evolving battle. In the United States economy the winners have already been designated to remain the winners in perpetuity; General Electric, General Motors, etc.
So the answer to your question is: "Yes, many American politicians believe in fascism, foremost among them is President Obama."
No, that is how fascist governments organized fascism.
Not entirely true. A costly social safety network invariably accompanies fascism. There is invariably a costly corporate tax on the selected winners, a sort of Don Corleone protection fee. Which again, is cost-effective in comparison to fighting off emerging competition.
As you know, the American Right heavily supported Hitler right up till the War, which is why they support its survival in 'Israel'. I don't think that you know much about this question. How would you define 'fascism'?
The ability to stand words on their heads is the sign of a true leftist. Modern Israel would be an anathema to Hitler: it would represent a failure of Nazi policy and he would be sided with his ideological cousins in seeking the demise of the Jewish state.
Stop with the re-directs/mis-direction nonsense.
Their data primarily comes from GOVERNMENT sources, and attacking the messenger might have been a reasonable defense against some posters before, but I won't tolerate it - its childish nonsense. You need to either detail what EXACTLY is incorrect about the specific claims in my post, or admit you lied about and have no genuine rebuttal.
As you know, Nazis and Zionism grew out of the same roots and have the same racist assumptions: all the Zionists learned from the Holocaust was to be the ones doing the racist killing.. Nowadays, like the American Right, Hitler would be murdering Muslims, as you know. All that bullshit was just a means to an end, namely the defence of capitalism.