Trump is an idiot

evince said:
you see dude its not the fucking labels that matter its the ideas
Click to expand...

Tell that to "christifan", who sole "arguments" consist of insulting the poster or dismissing any source as soon as they are exposed for lying. I do like certain aspects of the moderation style here, but would like to see posters who troll like that person dealt with by the admins as it makes rational discussion more difficult.
 
Last edited:
evince said:
thanks



January 17, 1938 – October 22, 1940



Ole Joe died in 1940.


what was the dem party like back then?



what do you know about the southern strategy?
Click to expand...





the dem party was basically the same as the R party now dude


which is more important

labels or ideas
 
transwarpdrive said:
WRONG, asshole moron. You refused to respond by claiming "those are not legitimate sources", which is a juvenile way of ducking the facts presented.

You're a weak-minded child like most of the far left/liberals who survive off the support of the government and other, better, smarter people.

You've been nailed multiple times in the threads I've seen both by me and others, and as a typical non-credible, weak poster you run away as soon as you get buried.
Click to expand...

So in other words when people disagree with you, you're good with going to sleazy sexual insults, just like the other cons here. And you call me weak-minded? Defaulting to vulgarity is a hallmark of small brains.

Only in your own mind have I been "nailed multiple times." Prepare to be called out on using biased sources, and your site was an example. It tried to gain legitimacy by mixing in govt. sources with conjecture and supposition but people like me can see through it.
 
transwarpdrive said:
Once again, you make personal attacks showing you are totally incapable of actually defending your claims. You suck as a poster, and should have been perma-banned a long time ago.
Click to expand...

Obviously you're not a new poster and possibly you are someone who's actually been banned or permabanned. Which is it?
 
transwarpdrive said:
Tell that to "christifan", who sole "arguments" consist of insulting the poster or any source as soon as they are exposed for lying. I do like certain aspects of the moderation style here, but would like to see posters who troll like that person dealt with by the admins as it makes rational discussion more difficult.
Click to expand...


when a society has a certain population that insists on clinging to lies and deny all FACTS it is incombant on that society to publically shame those people until they accept facts or shut the fuck up
 
evince said:
come hither my little cockroach

let me learn you some facts
Click to expand...

Ah, I see you are no more intelligent or worthwhile than the other idiotic garbage. Just the fact you asked for the post - all of two pages back in a 10-page thread showing how lazy and clueless you are - shows you're the same bottom-feeding dogshit as the others.

I had hoped you were better, but clearly not...go fuck your mother again and GTFO the thread, idiot.
 
you use fucking lies?


you out right deny known facts?


You leave this society no choice but to light your fucking ass up with constant insult sphincter miner
 
transwarpdrive said:
Ah, I see you are no more intelligent or worthwhile than the other idiotic garbage. Just the fact you asked for the post - all of two pages back in a 10-page thread showing how lazy and clueless you are - shows you're the same bottom-feeding dogshit as the others.

I had hoped you were better, but clearly not...go fuck your mother again and GTFO the thread, idiot.
Click to expand...

suck a dead goats gonads you lying lump of rat shit in shoe box
 
christiefan915 said:
Only in your own mind have I been "nailed multiple times." Prepare to be called out on using biased sources, and your site was an example. It tried to gain legitimacy by mixing in govt. sources with conjecture and supposition but people like me can see through it.
Click to expand...

I listed FIVE different sites, including a major magazine publication, and your simpleton response was to dismiss all of them outright, rather than address any of them. You did so because you know you cannot counter the facts presented in any of them, and thought you could deflect them with nonsense. You have nothing of value or intelligence to offer.
 
transwarpdrive said:
I listed FIVE different sites, including a major magazine publication, and your simpleton response was to dismiss all of them outright, rather than address any of them. You did so because you know you cannot counter the facts presented in any of them, and thought you could deflect them with nonsense. You have nothing of value or intelligence to offer.
Click to expand...

what post number?
 
transwarpdrive said:
I listed FIVE different sites, including a major magazine publication, and your simpleton response was to dismiss all of them outright, rather than address any of them. You did so because you know you cannot counter the facts presented in any of them, and thought you could deflect them with nonsense. You have nothing of value or intelligence to offer.
Click to expand...

Why are you afraid to post under your previous name? You must have been pretty reviled here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top