Trump judge releases 1,889 pages of additional election interference evidence against the former president

Magats_Love_NHB

Magats_Love_NHB

Let It Burn!

  • A federal judge has released additional evidence against Donald Trump in his election interference case.
  • The release follows a previously unsealed motion with new evidence against Trump by special counsel Jack Smith.
  • Trump tried to delay the release of Friday's court documents until after the 2024 presidential election.
A federal judge on Friday released more of prosecutors' evidence in the election interference case against Donald Trump after the former president failed in an 11th hour attempt to delay the unsealing of the files.


The release of the 1,889 pages of documents by United States District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan comes after the judge, earlier this month, released special counsel Jack Smith's 165-page bombshell motion that included a trove of new evidence against Trump in the case.

The documents released Friday are an appendix to the previously unsealed motion in which Smith and his team argued that Trump is not immune from criminal charges tied to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

The lengthy appendix includes partially redacted records that have been previously made publicly available.

Trump's attorneys filed a motion Thursday to attempt to delay the release of the appendix until November 14 — nine days after the 2024 presidential election, but Chutkan rejected the arguments.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to the four federal charges against him in the case.
 
They are charging him with election interference and in doing this document drop that is highly unusual, they are interfering with an election.
Now you want to know why the right calls this lawfare? No I guess you don't care. Winning by ANY means is the way of the new Democrat.
 
Publishing this kind of evidence before a trial is poisoning the jury pool, this tells me that this trial is probably never going to happen. They know it isn't going to happen and they don't care if they are poisoning the jury pool, they just want folks to be "shocked" as they release it literally as folks are voting. Yeah, this is IMHO election interference.
 
Goyboy said:
They are charging him with election interference and in doing this document drop that is highly unusual, they are interfering with an election.
Now you want to know why the right calls this lawfare? No I guess you don't care. Winning by ANY means is the way of the new Democrat.
Click to expand...
If you were an American, Almost Marco, you'd know that 1/6 was definitely an attempt to alter the election in his favor.
 
Damocles said:
Publishing this kind of evidence before a trial is poisoning the jury pool, this tells me that this trial is probably never going to happen. They know it isn't going to happen and they don't care if they are poisoning the jury pool, they just want folks to be "shocked" as they release it literally as folks are voting. Yeah, this is IMHO election interference.
Click to expand...
WTF are you talking about. All motions to the court are supposed to be public in our justice system. It is all about transparency. This particular motion is required because Trump's lawyers demanded that Smith show that his evidence wasn't in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling that official acts are granted immunity

When it comes time to seat a jury, both the prosecution and defense are able to ask questions to get unbiased jurors.

As to election interference, as the judge pointed out if they didn't stick with a standard court procedure, it would be election interference. Trump's repeated motions and appeals are what required this action at this time. It has nothing to do with the court trying to interfere in an election.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
WTF are you talking about. All motions to the court are supposed to be public in our justice system. It is all about transparency. This particular motion is required because Trump's lawyers demanded that Smith show that his evidence wasn't in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling that official acts are granted immunity

When it comes time to seat a jury, both the prosecution and defense are able to ask questions to get unbiased jurors.

As to election interference, as the judge pointed out if they didn't stick with a standard court procedure, it would be election interference. Trump's repeated motions and appeals are what required this action at this time. It has nothing to do with the court trying to interfere in an election.
Click to expand...
The potential for bias taints the jury pool. Pretending you've seen all the evidence of trials before the trial is absurd pretense. Such things can cause potential juries to form an opinion of guilt before hearing all the evidence in court.

You are pretending the defendant has no right to a fair trial and that pretrial publicity has never been a problem in the past. Usually in such cases where pretrial publicity causes jury bias a change of venue is in order, however when the entire nation gets the big T it taints all of the potential venues. As you see in this case.

Again, it is therefore my opinion that they know that this trial will never happen so they do not care about extreme pretrial publicity and bias. It is my informed opinion that they do this in an attempt to affect the election.
 
With any luck Trump will be allowed to retire after he loses next month.

Is there really any point in pursuing a sick old man?
 
Goyboy said:
If were a patriot, Dipshit Uncle, you would know that the 2020 election was a coup. Democrat voter fraud was massive, preplanned and coordinated.
Click to expand...
^^^
Proves English is a second language to him.

Thanks for the opinion of a Brazilian janitor, Almost Marco. :thup:
 
The Harris Administration said:
With any luck Trump will be allowed to retire after he loses next month.

Is there really any point in pursuing a sick old man?
Click to expand...
Retired via the 25th Amendment? I'm surprised the Republicans didn't want that for Biden. LOL

Yes. Justice requires all crimes to be prosecuted, but sentencing should involve mercy. Home arrest, no social media or internet and strict limits on visitors works for me.
 
Damocles said:
Publishing this kind of evidence before a trial is poisoning the jury pool, this tells me that this trial is probably never going to happen. They know it isn't going to happen and they don't care if they are poisoning the jury pool, they just want folks to be "shocked" as they release it literally as folks are voting. Yeah, this is IMHO election interference.
Click to expand...
Yep it is indeed election interference the "Judge" has shown that she is just a political hack.
 
I'm quite sure the judge will release all of the supposed 'evidence' that trump's lawyers present. Any jury pool will have seen both sides of the case.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Yes, it does, Almost Marco.

As for anti-American foreigners, having the CIA coordinate with Brazilian death squads also works for me. :flagsal:
Click to expand...
You can wave the American flag all you want but if you back Kamala Harris and the forces that stand behind her, you are truly a traitor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top