Trump judge releases 1,889 pages of additional election interference evidence against the former president

anonymoose said:
Never. What does that have to do with my question to Frank?
Click to expand...
Which candidate is imploding because they are talking about men's genitalia?

Trump had no competition at the convention.
Trump is imploding.
Your question is a loaded question in that it assumes "facts" not in evidence and ignores that the other candidate has many of the attributes you are assigning Harris.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Which candidate is imploding because they are talking about men's genitalia?
Click to expand...
Neither.
Trump had no competition at the convention.
Click to expand...
Of course not. He’d already wrapped up the nomination with *gasp* votes from the primaries.

Trump is imploding.
Click to expand...
According to polls he’s trending.
Your question is a loaded question in that it assumes "facts" not in evidence
Click to expand...
Let’s review the question:
why does the DNC parade out a candidate that not only got zero votes
Click to expand...
Fact.
but didn’t even have to be concerned about competition at the convention?
Click to expand...
Fact.
ignores that the other candidate has many of the attributes you are assigning Harris.
Click to expand...
I didn’t mention any other than she got no votes and had a closed convention.
WTF are you talking about?
 
In the end I don’t care. We have ranked choice voting and I’m having a hard time deciding who will be my first, second, third, etc.
Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, Goofy, Mickey Mouse?
Decisions decisions.
Although I think Minnie would make a great First Lady
 
Goyboy said:
They are charging him with election interference and in doing this document drop that is highly unusual, they are interfering with an election.
Now you want to know why the right calls this lawfare? No I guess you don't care. Winning by ANY means is the way of the new Democrat.
Click to expand...
Next time read the material before you spew mouth diarrhea
 
anonymoose said:
In the end I don’t care. We have ranked choice voting and I’m having a hard time deciding who will be my first, second, third, etc.
Bugs Bunny, Elmer Fudd, Goofy, Mickey Mouse?
Decisions decisions.
Although I think Minnie would make a great First Lady
Click to expand...
Better than any Republican on the ballot
 
Damocles said:
Publishing this kind of evidence before a trial is poisoning the jury pool, this tells me that this trial is probably never going to happen. They know it isn't going to happen and they don't care if they are poisoning the jury pool, they just want folks to be "shocked" as they release it literally as folks are voting. Yeah, this is IMHO election interference.
Click to expand...
So you didn’t read the judges filing either before you barfed up this idiocy?
 
moon said:
musk.jpg



www.bbc.co.uk

Elon Musk's $1m-a-day giveaway in swing states 'deeply concerning'

The winner will be chosen from those who sign a petition by the tech billionaire's Trump-supporting group.
www.bbc.co.uk


Haw, haw..............................................haw.
Click to expand...
What?

You like this criminal act?
 
anonymoose said:
Neither.

Of course not. He’d already wrapped up the nomination with *gasp* votes from the primaries.


According to polls he’s trending.

Let’s review the question:

Fact.

Fact.

I didn’t mention any other than she got no votes and had a closed convention.
WTF are you talking about?
Click to expand...
When did the DNC parade out any candidate? Your statement is not completely factual but attempts to color the facts.
Whether she got any votes is not relevant. The person with votes withdrew from running.
Not having competition at the convention is meaningless. (Trump had no competition.)
Then you completely leave out half of your post. You clearly mention much more than she got no votes and had a closed convention.

anonymoose said:
So why does the DNC parade out a candidate that not only got zero votes but didn’t even have to be concerned about competition at the convention?
And now her campaign is imploding not surprisingly.
It’s like you idiots try to lose.
Click to expand...
Her campaign is not imploding. I guess you don't know the difference between facts and opinions since your post is filled with opinions that have no basis in facts.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
When did the DNC parade out any candidate?
Click to expand...
August 19, 2024.
Your statement is not completely factual but attempts to color the facts.
Click to expand...
Which statement? I made several.

Whether she got any votes is not relevant. The person with votes withdrew from running.
Not having competition at the convention is meaningless.
Click to expand...
So she was installed . That’s not democracy. That’s pretty meaningful.
Trump had no competition.
Click to expand...
He did in the primaries. Where it counts.

Then you completely leave out half of your post. You clearly mention much more than she got no votes and had a closed convention.
Click to expand...
Then you should have no problem reposting that. Because that’s all I could find.
Her campaign is not imploding
Click to expand...
IMO. And others.

The Collapse of Kamala Harris | Opinion​

MSN

www.msn.com

I guess you don't know the difference between facts and opinions since your post is filled with opinions that have no basis in facts.
Click to expand...
Yet not only do you not state any facts yourself but you completely distort the facts I presented.
 
anonymoose said:
So why does the DNC parade out a candidate that not only got zero votes but didn’t even have to be concerned about competition at the convention?
Click to expand...

Because their original pick decided to retire. They had no choice. Why are you morons unable to understand that?

anonymoose said:
And now her campaign is imploding not surprisingly.
Click to expand...

Only in your imagination. I think the Harris campaign is doing just fine.

anonymoose said:
It’s like you idiots try to lose.
Click to expand...

You idiots picked a twice impeached, convicted felon, with the personality of a snake for your candidate...and you are asking why the Democrats are trying to lose????

Wake the fuck up.
 
Ross Dolan said:
Because their original pick decided to retire. They had no choice. Why are you morons unable to understand that?
Click to expand...
Then why wasn't there an open convention? In 1968 there was under the same circumstances.

Only in your imagination.
Click to expand...
In others' too.

MSN

www.msn.com

I think the Harris campaign is doing just fine.
Click to expand...
If you hide your head in the sand.

You idiots picked a twice impeached, convicted felon, with the personality of a snake for your candidate...and you are asking why the Democrats are trying to lose????
Click to expand...
We generally voted for Haley in the primaries. You must be referring to someone else

Wake the fuck up.
Click to expand...
I'm awake. But keep hiding your head in the sand.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
WTF are you talking about. All motions to the court are supposed to be public in our justice system. It is all about transparency. This particular motion is required because Trump's lawyers demanded that Smith show that his evidence wasn't in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling that official acts are granted immunity

When it comes time to seat a jury, both the prosecution and defense are able to ask questions to get unbiased jurors.

As to election interference, as the judge pointed out if they didn't stick with a standard court procedure, it would be election interference. Trump's repeated motions and appeals are what required this action at this time. It has nothing to do with the court trying to interfere in an election.
Click to expand...
Blatant lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top