Trump judge releases 1,889 pages of additional election interference evidence against the former president

This isn't all the evidence. It is the evidence needed to support the claim that the indictment is not based on official acts.

Did you bother to go look at it? How much of it is redacted so unable to be seen? How many people have actually gone and read the 1800 plus pages? You are arguing that it taints the jury pool because people that don't look at it will have seen it. Your argument is complete nonsense. In cases where the jury pool is tainted it's because the media stories are so biased against the defendant that the jury pool has already made up their mind. That is hardly the case here. There is almost nothing new in this filing. There is nothing new in the reporting about this filing.
It isn't evidence. It's a smear campaign.
 
That wasn't the argument I was responding to. The claim was the court filing would prevent Trump from getting a fair trial. Trials and court motions are supposed to be public in the US in order to be fair and allow the public to view the process. It is the basis of our court system.

The courts can't give defendants running for office a pass otherwise everyone arrested will just declare they are running for office in order to never go to trial. The evidence is clearly strong enough for Trump to be indicted and the case to not be dismissed for lack of evidence. If Trump hadn't committed a crime, he wouldn't be on trial.
Smear campaigns are not evidence, Sybil.
 
More ridiculous garbage from you.
The 1899 page appendix is a direct result of the Trump lawyers motion demanding that the prosecutors prove they have evidence to charge the crime. The appendix is simply the support of the 165 page filing.

None of this would have even been required if Trump, who claims he is innocent, had simply agreed to go to trial instead of filing motions to delay and delay and delay even more. The reason for the timing of the filing is because of Trump.
What crime?
 
^^^
Sybil be cray-cray.
X9EmwBi.gif
I am not you, Sybil. DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
 
Which candidate is imploding because they are talking about men's genitalia?

Trump had no competition at the convention.
Trump is imploding.
Your question is a loaded question in that it assumes "facts" not in evidence and ignores that the other candidate has many of the attributes you are assigning Harris.
Trump won the primary, which is more than anyone can say for Harris!
 
So why does the DNC parade out a candidate that not only got zero votes but didn’t even have to be concerned about competition at the convention?
And now her campaign is imploding not surprisingly.
It’s like you idiots try to lose.
You know, back when she was first anointed, I said the "New car smell" would wear off and her campaign would tank. Seems I was correct in that prediction.
 
DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEM ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE!
Definitely psychotic. Is your mom psychotic, son? I know it's not from my side of the family. :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

FWIW, psychotic women fuck like bunnies. Extreme sex, if you know what I mean. :thup:

DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE, SYBIL!
DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE, SYBIL!
DON'T TRY TO BLAME YOUR PROBLEMS ON ME OR ANYBODY ELSE, SYBIL!
 
August 19, 2024.
Show us the parade.
Which statement? I made several.
Are you unable to read the quote of your statement where I highlighted the parts you ignored?
So she was installed . That’s not democracy. That’s pretty meaningful.
She became the nominee the way candidates have officially become the nominee for over 100 years. She received the majority of the votes of delegates at the convention. Delegates at the convention are who the people voted for in a fashion similar to how the electoral college works.
He did in the primaries. Where it counts.
Delegates to the convention are not all selected based on primaries since some states hold caucuses.
Then you should have no problem reposting that. Because that’s all I could find.
Not sure why you couldn't find it since I included it in my post. Here it is again with the parts you ignored in your response highlighted and made bigger so you can't miss them.
So why does the DNC parade out a candidate that not only got zero votes but didn’t even have to be concerned about competition at the convention?
And now her campaign is imploding not surprisingly.
It’s like you idiots try to lose.

IMO. And others

The Collapse of Kamala Harris | Opinion​

LIke I said, you confuse facts with opinion.
Yet not only do you not state any facts yourself but you completely distort the facts I presented.
You didn't present facts. You presented opinion that you seem confused about since you call them facts.
 
You know, back when she was first anointed, I said the "New car smell" would wear off and her campaign would tank. Seems I was correct in that prediction.
Yes. Joy can only go so far w/out policies.
Although I have noticed that Trump is showing clips of her policies from 4.5 yrs. ago in his campaign ads. Why won't she?
 
What court??? A smear campaign is not evidence.

It's not a court filing. It's a smear campaign.

It's not going to work, Sybil.
Why did the judge have to rule to unseal the filing if it wasn't a court filing?

The judge did the work and made a ruling.

It sees you are doing your work and getting paid in rubles.
 
Then why wasn't there an open convention? In 1968 there was under the same circumstances.

C'mon, Anonmoose. Try to make your brain work.

There was an open convention. The delegates could have chosen anyone (qualified) that they wanted. They chose Kamala Harris.

In others' too.

If you and those others want to think Kamala Harris' campaign is imploding...fine with me. And I would suppose fine with her also. It is beyond stupid to suppose the other guy is finished...before the curtain has fallen.

If you hide your head in the sand.

My head is not in the sand. I think the Harris campaign is doing just fine. I suspect you do, too...which is why you are running as scared as you are.

Poor you.
We generally voted for Haley in the primaries. You must be referring to someone else

We??? You and the mouse in your pocket?

I am referring to the members of the Republican Party...who have chosen a twice impeached, convicted felon who is an asshole as their candidate.

Get real.
I'm awake. But keep hiding your head in the sand.

We'll see. Only a few weeks to go...and we'll see.
 
I suspect you do, too...which is why you are running as scared as you are.
I’m just trying to help you guys. You’ve made the same mistake as in 2016. Instead of having an open convention a horrible candidate was installed.
This election shouldn’t be close. I guess you like it that way.

We??? You and the mouse in your pocket?
I’m officially registered as a libertarian but I more closely resemble a Rockefeller republican, an extinct species but commonly referred to as a rino these days, sometimes a Never Trumper.

I am referring to the members of the Republican Party...who have chosen a twice impeached, convicted felon who is an asshole as their candidate.
That’s them, not we. I rejected them in 1999.



We'll see. Only a few weeks to go...and we'll see.
 
Back
Top