Trump May Face 25 Years in Prison, Be Blocked From Future Office: Kirschner

It was OJ...but, like with Trump and the Clintons, there wasn't enough evidence to convict.

Unfortunately for Pedo Don, while Hillary was smart enough to stay (mostly) within the legal lines albeit not the moral ones, Trump is a fucking narcissistic nutjob who will see him little empire burned to the ground for his crimes.

6d7tna.gif

That was not why he wasn’t convicted



The racism in the LAPD made the jury question the evidence
 
That was not why he wasn’t convicted

The racism in the LAPD made the jury question the evidence
The LAPD planted evidence but they didn't fabricate it, just moved it.

It was enough to create reasonable doubt. OJ is still the murderer.
 
Care to make a wager Slick Willie's crimes included perjury?

Nope



He didn’t commit purjury dude



Read the statute



For it to be perjury he would have had to lie about a NONCONSENTUAL SEX ACT



THE FACT HAS TO PERTAIN TO THE CASE



they were asking him about a consensual act

His legal sex life was immaterial



It was not perjury
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury



Perjury (also known as foreswearing) is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding.[A]

Like most other crimes in the common law system, to be convicted of perjury one must have had the intention (mens rea) to commit the act and to have actually committed the act (actus reus). Further, statements that are facts cannot be considered perjury, even if they might arguably constitute an omission, and it is not perjury to lie about matters that are immaterial to the legal proceeding. Statements that entail an interpretation of fact are not perjury because people often draw inaccurate conclusions unwittingly or make honest mistakes without the intent to deceive. Individuals may have honest but mistaken beliefs about certain facts or their recollection may be inaccurate, or may have a different perception of what is the accurate way to state the truth. In some jurisdictions, no crime has occurred when a false statement is (intentionally or unintentionally) made while under oath or subject to penalty. Instead, criminal culpability attaches only at the instant the declarant falsely asserts the truth of statements (made or to be made) that are material to the outcome of the proceeding. It is not perjury, for example, to lie about one's age except if age is a fact material to influencing the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits or whether a person was of an age to have legal capacity
 
The LAPD planted evidence but they didn't fabricate it, just moved it.

It was enough to create reasonable doubt. OJ is still the murderer.


What did they plant?


The defense made an LAPD cop on the case look like a racist because he wrote a script with the Nword in it


I have no idea if he really was a racist
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury



Perjury (also known as foreswearing) is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding.[A]

Like most other crimes in the common law system, to be convicted of perjury one must have had the intention (mens rea) to commit the act and to have actually committed the act (actus reus). Further, statements that are facts cannot be considered perjury, even if they might arguably constitute an omission, and it is not perjury to lie about matters that are immaterial to the legal proceeding. Statements that entail an interpretation of fact are not perjury because people often draw inaccurate conclusions unwittingly or make honest mistakes without the intent to deceive. Individuals may have honest but mistaken beliefs about certain facts or their recollection may be inaccurate, or may have a different perception of what is the accurate way to state the truth. In some jurisdictions, no crime has occurred when a false statement is (intentionally or unintentionally) made while under oath or subject to penalty. Instead, criminal culpability attaches only at the instant the declarant falsely asserts the truth of statements (made or to be made) that are material to the outcome of the proceeding. It is not perjury, for example, to lie about one's age except if age is a fact material to influencing the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits or whether a person was of an age to have legal capacity

Laws have real meanings
 
Nope

He didn’t commit purjury dude ...
He clearly committed perjury. This is exactly what I meant when pointing out that covering up corruption within one's own party while screaming about it in the opposing party is part of the problem.

https://www.famous-trials.com/clinton/886-analysis
In the case of William Clinton, we had a President who lied repeatedly under oath, suborned perjury, and hid evidence. His lies, while about sex, continued after they were necessary to save his marriage or avoid extreme embarrassment. He lied to the grand jury when his basis for doing so was to avoid admitting earlier acts of perjury. There is no question but that the President's actions were not those we would like to see from the nation's chief enforcer of federal law.
 
Back
Top