Those numbers were slanted significantly by the late Trafalgar polling in those states. You'll notice that Silver won't even bother to account for them, they are bought and paid for by the Republican party.
Trump needs a massive polling error to win
- Thread starter Concart
- Start date
Those numbers were slanted significantly by the late Trafalgar polling in those states. You'll notice that Silver won't even bother to account for them, they are bought and paid for by the Republican party.
No, it makes it exactly correct. Do you think before you post? That is the whole premise of the thread. The polls have to be wrong for Trump to win.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
no. that's not exactly my theory.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
The polls are irrelevant for Trump to win. If there were no polls it would make no difference to the outcome. If there were three times as many polls it would make no difference to the outcome. The polls have nothing to do with the outcome, the vote by state does.
I’d disagree, Trump will win Florida, NC, Texas, and Georgia, he has to, and we have been hearing another those States turning Blue for the last four elections and they never even come close. But Trump also has to win Arizona and Pennsylvania given Biden will carry Wisc, Mich, Minn, NH, Nevada, it will be a nail bitter, not definitively decided for a week or so, and then the Trump litigation will start.
Let me add, I hope I am wrong
For once I agree with “TA,” people put it much faith in election polls, and the irony is that there are new ones every day, if you wait long enough anyone can find a poll to support what they want to believe.
If there is one benefit to Trump winning, and I’d say the only benefit, it is that all political polling will immediately become obsolete
And if wishes were fishes.
There ARE polls, And those polls would have be off significantly for Trump to win. Which part of that are you having trouble understanding?
If you had access to information that would pick a winner 80% of the time in a sporting event, you'd be a rich man. I put faith in science, math, statistics and probabilities, not poll.
Truck Fump / h1b
Verified User
unless you get cancelled.
Butthurt dimtard babbloney.
Projection. My analysis is concise and accurate. You appear to be retarded.
I think that Asshat meant he likes tRump's "hot loads" all over HIS face.
Oh my! Trump will never beat Hillary now!
But polls are “science, math, statistics, and probabilities,” and in a one time event as an election, that 20% is huge
Currently the betting odds, which takes into account probability based on actual wagering has it a much closer race than the usual polls (https://www.oddschecker.com/us/insi...of-wagers-this-weekend-on-trump-beating-biden)
Yakuda
Verified User
Prove he "stole" the last one cunt mouth. You people will say any stupid shit that comes into your head won't you?
Wow, that's the first time I've ever heard that. Oh wait, I'm wrong, it's the 10,347th time. It is 2020. It is a FACT that there would have to be a massive polling error for Trump to win. If you believe there is a massive polling error, that's fine. But I don't think you are capable of even a shallow thought. Common troll. Not a very good one either. Which one are you AKA?
Exactly. Waging is for suckers. The odds are set by the amount of money wagered on either side. Anyone who gets less than 10/1 and bets on Trump is giving their money away. This is why I love to play poker.
It would not have to be "massive." RCP gives Biden a 2.3% lead in 6 top battleground states.
FL: 0.9
NC: 0.2
PA: 1.2
AZ: 0.9
All within the margin of error (except WI and MI). Any error could benefit Biden as well as Trump.
Yakuda
Verified User
Prove he "stole" the last election cuntcart
Classic dimtard babble. Go back to shill school, faggot. But, to be honest, I'm AKA your worst nightmare. Now take you a healthy swig of this:
