Trump says Bush lied us to war

Dutch Uncle said:
Like Bill Clinton lying about inhaling and having sex with that woman, Bush lied to the American public. Sorry, but I'm not seeing the evidence that the Intel and Military committees in each house were also receiving fabricated data? There are military members briefing those committees too. 17 different intelligence agencies exist within the US. The biggies being the two expected ones and the military.

There's a lot of shit going on behind the scenes as we saw with General Milley. The Intel and Military committees in each house had to same info as Bush and let it go. Fog of War coupled with Democrats afraid of being soft on terror are what allowed the Iraq War fiasco. Obviously the Republicans are guilty as hell for pushing it.
Click to expand...

They fixed the intel dude


Why would they not show them the intel that they fixed to make their case Look good



Dutch


The senators said they got the fixed intel


Your being as blond as a trumper


And Ronny rayguns cheated in both his elections


It’s court documented factual
 
evince said:
The report, which was released on July 9, 2004, identified numerous failures in the intelligence-gathering and -analysis process. The report found that these failures led to the creation of inaccurate materials that misled both government policy makers and the American public.

Senators John D. Rockefeller (D-WV) (the Committee's vice-chairman), Carl Levin (D-MI), and Richard Durbin (D-IL), used their additional view to say that rthe report painted an incomplete pictue, because the Committee had put off until phase two of the investigation the key question of "how intelligence on Iraq was used or misused by Administration officials in public statements and reports." Because of this, they said, "the Committee's phase one report fails to fully explain the environment of intense pressure in which Intelligence Community officials were asked to render judgments on matters relating to Iraq when policy officials had already forcefully stated their own conclusions in public."
Click to expand...
When the evidence came out all agreed he lied to them

You are denying facts dutch

You are too smart to do that silly move
Click to expand...
Looks more to me like they understood the evidence was incomplete to justify Bush's conclusions, but nothing about lying. The Democrats went along with it because they were afraid of being labeled "soft on terror".
 
evince said:
They fixed the intel dude


Why would they not show them the intel that they fixed to make their case Look good



Dutch


The senators said they got the fixed intel


Your being as blond as a trumper


And Ronny rayguns cheated in both his elections


It’s court documented factual
Click to expand...
Falsifying public documents is a crime. If that was really what happened, why didn't Obama arrest him?
 
Colin Powell Still Wants Answers
In 2003, he made the case for invading Iraq to halt its weapons programs. The analysts who provided the intelligence now say it was doubted inside the C.I.A. at the time.
 
evince said:
Colin Powell Still Wants Answers
In 2003, he made the case for invading Iraq to halt its weapons programs. The analysts who provided the intelligence now say it was doubted inside the C.I.A. at the time.
Click to expand...

What was doubted was why a land invasion was necessary to blow up Saddam's "palaces".

What should have happened is when Hans Blix was denied access to an area for inspection, the reaction should have been a B-52 strike on the installation.

Sure, give them a 2 hour warning the first time then cut it in half each subsequent mission...but I doubt it'd go more than two missions.

3bryj3.gif
 
evince said:
BIG DIFFERENCE HUH
Click to expand...
Yes. Still, once we allowed Presidents to be lying adulterers, look at what happened?

More on Hans Blix and his thoughts about Bush: https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/03/18_blix.shtml

Blix accused U.S. President George W. Bush and U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair of acting not in bad faith, but with a severe lack of "critical thinking." The United States and Britain failed to examine the sources of their primary intelligence - Iraqi defectors with their own agendas for encouraging regime change - with a skeptical eye, he alleged. In the buildup to the war, Saddam Hussein and the Iraqis were cooperating with U.N. inspections, and in February 2003 had provided Blix's team with the names of hundreds of scientists to interview, individuals Saddam claimed had been involved in the destruction of banned weapons. Had the inspections been allowed to continue, Blix said, there would likely be a very different situation in Iraq today. As it was, America's pre-emptive, unilateral actions "have bred more terrorism there and elsewhere."
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Yes. Still, once we allowed Presidents to be lying adulterers, look at what happened?

More on Hans Blix and his thoughts about Bush: https://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/03/18_blix.shtml

Blix accused U.S. President George W. Bush and U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair of acting not in bad faith, but with a severe lack of "critical thinking." The United States and Britain failed to examine the sources of their primary intelligence - Iraqi defectors with their own agendas for encouraging regime change - with a skeptical eye, he alleged. In the buildup to the war, Saddam Hussein and the Iraqis were cooperating with U.N. inspections, and in February 2003 had provided Blix's team with the names of hundreds of scientists to interview, individuals Saddam claimed had been involved in the destruction of banned weapons. Had the inspections been allowed to continue, Blix said, there would likely be a very different situation in Iraq today. As it was, America's pre-emptive, unilateral actions "have bred more terrorism there and elsewhere."
Click to expand...



Nixon got pardoned for cheating in an election dude


No fall out at all


All he did was bail
 
It’s not illegal to fuck while in office


No court would have even called his lie about private sex under oath a crime


It has to be Germaine to the case

He wasn’t being impeached for legal sex


That’s not a crime huh
 
Matt Dillon said:
Yes. It is. It can destroy a Democracy.

It will be discovered how 2020 was cheated. Things like that always are.
Click to expand...

It’s already known idiot


Ask the courts in which trump lies about election problems were crushed due to NO EVIDENCE AND OUT RIGHT LIES


Again

All USA court records prove republicans cheat in elections
 
Matt Dillon said:
Yes. It is. It can destroy a Democracy.

It will be discovered how 2020 was cheated. Things like that always are.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Trump's attempts to steal the election will come back to bite both him and the anti-American cocksuckers who helped him.

I hope to see the fucking traitors hang, but doubt that will ever happen. At best, some of the anti-American Trumpers will resist arrest and be shot down in the streets by law enforcement.
 
It’s interesting how the republicans are trying to save the Bush reputation with lies



I thought trump told them to hate bush
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top