"Trump says there should be no Mueller report"

Ralph said:
A report on a "nothing burger" ends up with NOTHING in it. Are you vapor locking because there is no evidence that produced any prosecution other than the criminals that should been prosecuted decades ago? Funnier than hell. SYMBOLIC.....laugh my freaking ass off....and admission the left is doing nothing on the tax payer dime but "BLOVIATING". :rolleyes:


BLOVIATE: Orate (talk) verbosely (using to many words in order appear important) and WINDILY
Click to expand...

Well after regurgitating all those talk radio talking points it is quite noticeable that you didn't even begin to answer nor address either of the questions posed in the topic post

Want to try again?
 
archives said:
second source, there are plenty
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/15/trump-mueller-investigation-1222895

And, "Fake Media won’t show it. I am an innocent man being persecuted" - Donald Trump, 11:44 AM - Mar 3, 2019

Got any more questions?
Click to expand...

So the quote was taken out of context in an effort to promote another FALSE narrative.

"So, if there was knowingly & acknowledged to be 'zero' crime when the Special Counsel was appointed, and if the appointment was made based on the Fake Dossier (paid for by Crooked Hillary) and now disgraced Andrew McCabe (he & all stated no crime), then the Special Counsel...should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report,"

Is he wrong? Why?
 
archives said:
second source, there are plenty
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/15/trump-mueller-investigation-1222895

And, "Fake Media won’t show it. I am an innocent man being persecuted" - Donald Trump, 11:44 AM - Mar 3, 2019

Got any more questions?
Click to expand...

If a case is based on faked evidence, it is thrown out. If a prosecutor fails to provide exculpatory evidence, it is thrown out.

Why not here?

The initial warrant was based on bullshit, thus the warrant is invalid making anything after not admissible.

Why not here?
 
Yurt said:
If a case is based on faked evidence, it is thrown out. If a prosecutor fails to provide exculpatory evidence, it is thrown out.

Why not here?

The initial warrant was based on bullshit, thus the warrant is invalid making anything after not admissible.

Why not here?
Click to expand...

Your opinion doesn't work in an actual court of law, The investigation has been under scrutiny this whole time and is still going. Do you really think every judge and person of importance along the way is too stupid to do their job?
 
archives said:
Not any different than what was initially posted, and irrelevant, even if it was supposedly illegal, which it wasn't, why wouldn't he want the full results make public to show his innocence?
Click to expand...

Its a simple thing......If nothing "incriminating" is found …..Mr. Trump has the right to deny public disclosure. Congress can vote to hell and back.....Congress has no legal authority to demand full disclosure.

Even the POTUS has his/her constitutional rights contained within the Bill of Rights. If the DOJ cannot make a legal effort to get Mueller to "disclose"...….Congress can? LMAO

Judicial watch sued in an attempt to obtain disclosure.

The entire thing is nothing but a SOAP OPERA produced by the dog and phony show that is the DNC and the Media. All MOUTH....NO ASS.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Your opinion doesn't work in an actual court of law, The investigation has been under scrutiny this whole time and is still going. Do you really think every judge and person of importance along the way is too stupid to do their job?
Click to expand...

Are you saying my post is wrong? You're telling me those things can happen and there will be a lawful conviction?

The issues I presented happen all the time in investigations and when it gets to court it gets thrown out or overturned.

That isn't an opinion.
 
Yurt said:
Are you saying my post is wrong? You're telling me those things can happen and there will be a lawful conviction?

The issues I presented happen all the time in investigations and when it gets to court it gets thrown out or overturned.

That isn't an opinion.
Click to expand...

I'm saying you're wrong about the Mueller investigation. It wasn't "based on bullshit" and whether or not Trump himself is implicated on any criminal offense is yet to be seen, that's why it's an INVESTIGATION and not a TRIAL.
 
noise said:
did he say he was "afraid?" no he said and he is 100% correct - Mueller was a construct of the Deep State; an "insurance policy' if Trump won
Click to expand...

Mueller is working to clear poor conald's reputation, as many Americana & folks around the world honestly believe, for whatever million reasons that he is a con man & crook & has committed crimes to get into office.

The cultists & conald himself should be very happy that his name will be cleared, since he IS TOTALLY INNOCENT OF EVERYTHING!! :whome:
 
Bill said:
Mueller is working to clear poor conald's reputation, as many Americana & folks around the world honestly believe, for whatever million reasons that he is a con man & crook & has committed crimes to get into office.

The cultists & conald himself should be very happy that his name will be cleared, since he IS TOTALLY INNOCENT OF EVERYTHING!! :whome:
Click to expand...
sure whatever you say -but you should have used green ink on that it's such twisted logic
 
Mr.Badguy said:
I'm saying you're wrong about the Mueller investigation. It wasn't "based on bullshit" and whether or not Trump himself is implicated on any criminal offense is yet to be seen, that's why it's an INVESTIGATION and not a TRIAL.
Click to expand...

Steele Dossier is not bullshit?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top