Trump supporters want respect

Fentoine Lum said:
Yes of course, the eurocentric perception of reality is that hominid societies began in when euros became somewhat aware of their surroundings.
Click to expand...

You are going to have to clarify that bit of nonsense for me. Whores were around long before any Eurocentric Perceptions, and have been ever since.
 
Old Trapper said:
You are going to have to clarify that bit of nonsense for me. Whores were around long before any Eurocentric Perceptions, and have been ever since.
Click to expand...

"Red light" districts is so euro pard. Remember the "age of discovery", it might have been more accurately named the "age of diminishing European ignorance" as we look around a bit for others to exploit.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Some women did not make the choice to have sex.

So are you saying that if a woman is raped...or coerced into sex...and the pregnancy is a result of that...you would be okay with laws allowing her to exercise her "choice" when she wants?
Click to expand...

Don't put words in my mouth. Rape accounts for less then 1% of abortions, and even fewer women are "coerced" into having sex. In fact, false claims of rape far outnumber actual rape cases.

As to the matter of an abortion following an actual case of rape, I would oppose it simply because why would one punish the baby for the acts of another? I would also oppose any law preventing it.
 
Old Trapper said:
Don't put words in my mouth. Rape accounts for less then 1% of abortions, and even fewer women are "coerced" into having sex. In fact, false claims of rape far outnumber actual rape cases.
Click to expand...

Care to cite a reputable source for all that nonsense?

As to the matter of an abortion following an actual case of rape, I would oppose it simply because why would one punish the baby for the acts of another?
Click to expand...

Then why did you bring up the "she made the choice" bullshit?

MY GUESS: Your position is a religious one. You have decided the god, who apparently murders vast numbers of children, asks you to "protect" the fetuses.

And I sure as hell would not trust your judgement as to what is "an actual case of rape."

Are you willing to state without equivocation that religion plays no part in this anti-choice stance of yours?

I would also oppose any law preventing it.
Click to expand...

???
 
Frank Apisa said:
I do not give a shit what you do...or did.

It is my opinion that anyone who did not enthusiastically support Hillary Clinton in the last election helped get Donald Trump elected.

If you have issue with that opinion, why not deal with it rather than that other crap.
Click to expand...

Like I said, you evidently believe there were only two choices, and both of them were corrupt.

Hillary won by 3 million votes, and still lost the Presidency. Deal with it.
 
Old Trapper said:
Don't put words in my mouth. Rape accounts for less then 1% of abortions, and even fewer women are "coerced" into having sex. In fact, false claims of rape far outnumber actual rape cases.

As to the matter of an abortion following an actual case of rape, I would oppose it simply because why would one punish the baby for the acts of another? I would also oppose any law preventing it.
Click to expand...

In fact, false claims of rape far outnumber actual rape cases.
Click to expand...

Could you please share your research on that with us? I'd like to know more.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
"Red light" districts is so euro pard. Remember the "age of discovery", it might have been more accurately named the "age of diminishing European ignorance" as we look around a bit for others to exploit.
Click to expand...

Hey little cowboy, "red light" (actually red paper lanterns) were indicative of brothels 100 years before the first ones were found in Amsterdam, and then the US.
 
Old Trapper said:
Like I said, you evidently believe there were only two choices, and both of them were corrupt.
Click to expand...

What the hell are you talking about?

I KNOW there were more than 2 choices. I KNOW that for an absolute fact.

And it does not impact on what I said or what you quoted me saying.

Wake up.

Hillary won by 3 million votes, and still lost the Presidency.
Click to expand...

Hillary lost. Donald Trump won. In my opinion...Donald Trump won fair and square...according to the rules in place before the election and still in place.

What is your problem?

Your side won. My side lost.

I have never suggested otherwise.

But that has NOTHING to do with what your are supposedly responding to.




Deal with it.
Click to expand...

You are a nut case, Trapper.

I am dealing with it.

I ask again: What the hell is your problem?
 
Frank Apisa said:
Care to cite a reputable source for all that nonsense?
Click to expand...

Seriously? You lack the ability to look it up?

Then why did you bring up the "she made the choice" bullshit?

MY GUESS: Your position is a religious one. You have decided the god, who apparently murders vast numbers of children, asks you to "protect" the fetuses.

And I sure as hell would not trust your judgement as to what is "an actual case of rape."

Are you willing to state without equivocation that religion plays no part in this anti-choice stance of yours?
Click to expand...

Not being the hypocrite like yourself, of course religion plays a part in my conclusions. However, and this you would deny being the pervert you are, science also plays a role, and you have yet to disprove the science.
 
Old Trapper said:
Hey little cowboy, "red light" (actually red paper lanterns) were indicative of brothels 100 years before the first ones were found in Amsterdam, and then the US.
Click to expand...

Cool. Hunert years. Out of how many years of hominid civilizations? You're aware Amsterdam in in Europe, no?
 
Where do people without a good hatefest forum go to vent?

For me, this forum is somewhat equivalent to having Trump's likeness painted on the bottom of my toilet.

As for all of the free will talk, though, it's yet to be scientifically proven. They've yet to come close to proving that.
It's entirely possible that the entire universe and all that occurs within it are merely the random confluence of sub-atomic particles.

But let's not worry about it for now.

We enjoy losing our shit on one another too much.
 
Last edited:
Fentoine Lum said:
An attorney advert? Let's review the claim:

In fact, false claims of rape far outnumber actual rape cases.

In a word sir, bullshit, at least thus far. Do let me know if you find support for the claim, won't you?
Click to expand...

I understand how hard it is for you to comprehend simple English, however, the article I posted clearly stated that false allegations of rape were far less then actual rape claims. Try reading it fool.
 
Frank Apisa said:
What the hell are you talking about?

I KNOW there were more than 2 choices. I KNOW that for an absolute fact.

And it does not impact on what I said or what you quoted me saying.

Wake up.
Click to expand...

Hey dumbass, your claim was that if more people had voted for Hillary, and not the third parties, she would have won. Total stupidity.

Hillary lost. Donald Trump won. In my opinion...Donald Trump won fair and square...according to the rules in place before the election and still in place.
Click to expand...

Guess it depends on your definition of "fair and square". If by lying, and denigrating all others, and appealing to the lowest common denominator, is your definition of "fair and square" you may be right.

What is your problem?

Your side won. My side lost.

I have never suggested otherwise.

But that has NOTHING to do with what your are supposedly responding to.
Click to expand...

I voted for Darrell Castle, and have not voted for a Dem, or a Rep, since I voted for Reagan in his first term.

You are a nut case, Trapper.

I am dealing with it.

I ask again: What the hell is your problem?
Click to expand...

Only in the realm of the alt, reality. In the real world I know what I am talking about.
 
Old Trapper said:
Seriously? You lack the ability to look it up?
Click to expand...

I think EVERYONE...including you...lacks the ability to look it up...because I am pretty sure you just made it up.

But I understand. Why should you bother with truth...when you can so easily lie.


Not being the hypocrite like yourself, of course religion plays a part in my conclusions.
Click to expand...

I suspect it plays the major part.

So why not explain why your religion makes this disgusting attitude of yours the proper attitude?

What is your religion...and why do you say your religion leads you to what you are suggesting must be the case?

However, and this you would deny being the pervert you are, science also plays a role, and you have yet to disprove the science.
Click to expand...

What "science" are you asking me to "disprove?"

Are you an adult? Are you sane?

What the hell are you arguing?
 
Old Trapper said:
Hey dumbass, your claim was that if more people had voted for Hillary, and not the third parties, she would have won. Total stupidity.
Click to expand...

i DEFY YOU TO FIND ME SAYING THAT.

(Don't bother looking, I never did.)

Guess it depends on your definition of "fair and square". If by lying, and denigrating all others, and appealing to the lowest common denominator, is your definition of "fair and square" you may be right.
Click to expand...

I mean by getting more votes in the Electoral College.

If you want to suggest that Trump did NOT get more votes in the Electoral College...we can discuss that.


I voted for Darrell Castle, and have not voted for a Dem, or a Rep, since I voted for Reagan in his first term.
Click to expand...

One...I do not give a shit who you voted for.

Two...how did Darrell Castle make out?


Only in the realm of the alt, reality. In the real world I know what I am talking about.
Click to expand...

You may KNOW the difference between horse shit and bull shit...but even that I doubt you could put into comprehensible sentences.
 
Frank Apisa said:
I think EVERYONE...including you...lacks the ability to look it up...because I am pretty sure you just made it up.

But I understand. Why should you bother with truth...when you can so easily lie.
Click to expand...

No, I leave the lyig toy your kind of Trumpkin with your low IQ;s, and lack of information, and desire to know the truth:

https://loveboth.ie/d-what-about-abortion-following-rape/

I suspect it plays the major part.

So why not explain why your religion makes this disgusting attitude of yours the proper attitude?

What is your religion...and why do you say your religion leads you to what you are suggesting must be the case?
Click to expand...

You can "suspect" all you want, however, your inability to face the truth makes your "suspicions" about as useful as shit in your Trump salad. Might taste good to you, just not healthy. Hell, you even ignore the science I have presented, and now you think that my religious beliefs are of some importance to your argument.

What "science" are you asking me to "disprove?"
Click to expand...

One has to laugh at the ignorance of those who claim to be so "intelligent". You could start with proving that life does not begin at conception. You won't because to do so would be to admit you support murder of the unborn.

Are you an adult? Are you sane?

What the hell are you arguing?
Click to expand...

And the fool ends his commentary with a child's response.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top