Trump Thought Only Black People Were on Welfare

Taichiliberal said:
Prove what you say with FACTS from the reputable agencies that collect such data. If you can't, then STFU and put your mouth back on Hannity's butt.
Click to expand...

I've proven that 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks is on food stamps and 1 in every 8 is on welfare using percentages provided by your fellow lefties. They gave the numbers. I simply did the math for them.

Should I prove it to you so you can get your lips off the black boy former President's asshole?
 
More white people are on welfare than any other race. Therefore when/if welfare reform is introduced in Congress and is called racist people should be reminded of this fact.
 
Havana Moon said:
Not proportionately though, see post 6.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I understand that. A big part of passing legislation is marketing and changes in the welfare system will invariably be called racist. Pointing out that whites will be the most affected by the changes is a buttress to those claims.

(race should be irrelevant when it comes to improving the system but the reality is it will play a role)
 
cawacko said:
I understand that. A big part of passing legislation is marketing and changes in the welfare system will invariably be called racist. Pointing out that whites will be the most affected by the changes is a buttress to those claims.

(race should be irrelevant when it comes to improving the system but the reality is it will play a role)
Click to expand...
Not sure everybody does understand that.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
christiefan915 said:
Let's bring trump back in for a minute. Every critical thing you mentioned above has been the standard trump m.o. from Day One. Every day he criticizes or denigrates a person, a policy or a country. Every day he spouts big plans but does not follow through. Every day trump's mouth talks populism and being a champion of the little guy, while his hand signs paperwork that works against the very people his forked tongue claims to support.

You wrote "every one of us, included the current prez, are human beings and must be treated as such." You wrote that a few sentences after you wrote "a large percentage of our tolerant, broad minded, progressive compadres are utter hypocrites." Maybe these two sentences will help you see why some of us don't consider you the non partisan of your avatar.

I cannot respect a man who puts hatefulness on display every single day. A man who constantly trades in the insults, gossip and falsehoods you criticize in others. This man is supposed to represent the entire country but it's crystal-clear he does not. This man who claimed he was going to unite the country has divided it more than ever before.

You wrote "discuss the issues, discuss them passionately but treat others the way you would want to be treated." Yet your own post doesn't treat Pelosi, Clinton and progressives with that high-minded sentiment. Frankly, I'm puzzled by the contradictions in your post.
Click to expand...

You are in uproar Haiti and Africa. Did you defend the deplorables or the bible thumping gun clingers as well? Are we defending people in other countries over our own citizens? Why? Did Hillary call our citizens deplorables......?
Stating facts, no?
 
Lovebug said:
You are in uproar Haiti and Africa. Did you defend the deplorables or the bible thumping gun clingers as well? Are we defending people in other countries over our own citizens? Why? Did Hillary call our citizens deplorables......?
Stating facts, no?
Click to expand...

How does defending people in other countries from trump's hateful comments take away anything from America?
 
christiefan915 said:
How does defending people in other countries from trump's hateful comments take away anything from America?
Click to expand...

Did you defend deplorables or are you shaming them continually? Are you defending your fellow citizens from being called idiots and racists for having voted for Trump? Are you defending the right to vote, or are you agreeing with the ones who smear and denigrate our fellow citizens? Why are these insults ok?
 
Lovebug said:
Did you defend deplorables or are you shaming them continually? Are you defending your fellow citizens from being called idiots and racists for having voted for Trump? Are you defending the right to vote, or are you agreeing with the ones who smear and denigrate our fellow citizens? Why are these insults ok?
Click to expand...

The shaming and denigrating comes from both sides. See: "What we can say for sure is that his term(s) prove that a large percentage of our tolerant, broad minded, progressive compadres are utter hypocrites." Was that not smearing those who did not vote for trump?

I am not only defending the right to vote, I am against those policies that try to limit it. Republican policies, not Democratic. Unlike trump and his supporters I accept that Hillary won the popular vote and it wasn't because three million illegals voted for her.

I am criticizing the president of this country and his uncalled-for, spiteful, egregious language toward other countries. That's different from posting opposing views on a political forum.
 
Lovebug said:
You are in uproar Haiti and Africa. Did you defend the deplorables or the bible thumping gun clingers as well? Are we defending people in other countries over our own citizens? Why? Did Hillary call our citizens deplorables......?
Stating facts, no?
Click to expand...

Well, *that* doesn't sound very "non-partisan." Did you condemn Romney when he mocked the "47%"?

BTW, you took Obama's quote about Guns and Bibles out of context. I like your posts and you, but your cred is seriously deteriorating here.

"A political storm is brewing over Sen. Barack Obama's recent statements. Last Sunday, Obama was explaining his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest, saying they have become frustrated with economic conditions:

"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said."

He was actually expressing sympathy for those in sub-optimal economic straits, and his frustration in trying to reach them politically, but the RW wants to keep that out of context.

Link: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2008/april/obama-they-cling-to-guns-or-religion.html
 
christiefan915 said:
The shaming and denigrating comes from both sides. See: "What we can say for sure is that his term(s) prove that a large percentage of our tolerant, broad minded, progressive compadres are utter hypocrites." Was that not smearing those who did not vote for trump?

I am not only defending the right to vote, I am against those policies that try to limit it. Republican policies, not Democratic. Unlike trump and his supporters I accept that Hillary won the popular vote and it wasn't because three million illegals voted for her.

I am criticizing the president of this country and his uncalled-for, spiteful, egregious language toward other countries. That's different from posting opposing views on a political forum.
Click to expand...

ThatOwlWoman said:
Well, *that* doesn't sound very "non-partisan." Did you condemn Romney when he mocked the "47%"?

BTW, you took Obama's quote about Guns and Bibles out of context. I like your posts and you, but your cred is seriously deteriorating here.

"A political storm is brewing over Sen. Barack Obama's recent statements. Last Sunday, Obama was explaining his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest, saying they have become frustrated with economic conditions:

"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said."

He was actually expressing sympathy for those in sub-optimal economic straits, and his frustration in trying to reach them politically, but the RW wants to keep that out of context.

Link: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2008/april/obama-they-cling-to-guns-or-religion.html
Click to expand...

Not looking for creds, just stating my opinion. Think whatever you like. It matters not.
Pointing out hypocrisy is very different than calling people dumb, racist, or idiots.
 
Getin the ring said:
you get dumber every post,
that opening thread starter has no merit to fact. Or at least no claim to bear out what your fellow dumb-a$$ was implying
Click to expand...

what do you gain by being such a racist lump of shit


what exactly do you think it gains you in life ass master?
 
CFM said:
All one has to do is understand proportions to know that blacks have the higher proportional use of food stamps and welfare than whites. It's quite obvious you're not one of those that understand proportions.
Click to expand...

yes obviously. when 27% of a demographic is also 25% of the snap program, I'd say that demographic is using the system in greater numbers proportionally

But I'm more concerned with the abuse of the snap program, could one of the racist on the board, blackascoal or the thread starter kindly provide that info, since it seems to be your specialty
 
Getin the ring said:
yes obviously. when 27% of a demographic is also 25% of the snap program, I'd say that demographic is using the system in greater numbers proportionally

But I'm more concerned with the abuse of the snap program, could one of the racist on the board, blackascoal or the thread starter kindly provide that info, since it seems to be your specialty
Click to expand...

When those percentages were done, there were approximately 45 million people using food stamps. Blacks make up 12.5% or 41 million of the 325 million U.S. population. 25.7% of that 45 million or 11.6 million are black. If 11.6 million out of 41 million blacks use food stamps, that calculates to 28.3% of blacks using food stamps. That 28.3% equates to 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks getting food stamps.

For whites, the percentage was total food stamp users was 40.2%. White makes up 68% or 221 million of the 325 million U.S. population. 40.2% of food stamp recipients or 18.1 million are white. 18.1 million/221 million = 8.2%, the percentage of the white population that uses food stamps. That 8.2% equates to 1 in every 12.2 whites getting food stamps.

If 100 whites and 100 blacks where lined up and a count was started, by the time the first white was counted, there would already be 3 and almost 4 blacks counted.
 
evince said:
sociopaths

evil fucking racist sociopaths
Click to expand...

For somebody that claims to deal in facts you seem very reticent to accept the truth. I gave you a link to the fact that black males commit approx 50% of all homicides and you just ran for cover.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
christiefan915 said:
The shaming and denigrating comes from both sides. See: "What we can say for sure is that his term(s) prove that a large percentage of our tolerant, broad minded, progressive compadres are utter hypocrites." Was that not smearing those who did not vote for trump?

I am not only defending the right to vote, I am against those policies that try to limit it. Republican policies, not Democratic. Unlike trump and his supporters I accept that Hillary won the popular vote and it wasn't because three million illegals voted for her.

I am criticizing the president of this country and his uncalled-for, spiteful, egregious language toward other countries. That's different from posting opposing views on a political forum.
Click to expand...

ThatOwlWoman said:
Well, *that* doesn't sound very "non-partisan." Did you condemn Romney when he mocked the "47%"?

BTW, you took Obama's quote about Guns and Bibles out of context. I like your posts and you, but your cred is seriously deteriorating here.

"A political storm is brewing over Sen. Barack Obama's recent statements. Last Sunday, Obama was explaining his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest, saying they have become frustrated with economic conditions:

"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said."

He was actually expressing sympathy for those in sub-optimal economic straits, and his frustration in trying to reach them politically, but the RW wants to keep that out of context.

Link: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2008/april/obama-they-cling-to-guns-or-religion.html
Click to expand...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...C-ACHIEVEMENT-IN-THE-US&p=2174396#post2174396
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top