Trump Thought Only Black People Were on Welfare

cawacko said:
More white people are on welfare than any other race. Therefore when/if welfare reform is introduced in Congress and is called racist people should be reminded of this fact.
Click to expand...

Ahh, but you forget that in order to move an agenda you have to sell it to the people. And to the majority population who are NOT on welfare (who are still white), the common misconception is that the VAST majority of people on welfare are GENERATIONAL black folk. So when the greedy powers that be want full control and cooperation with their economic agenda to eliminate everything derived from The New Deal, it is necessary to push that racist button, because to date I have YET to see the MSM broadcast the FACT that the majority of folk on welfare are white, single parent women.
 
Getin the ring said:
yes obviously. when 27% of a demographic is also 25% of the snap program, I'd say that demographic is using the system in greater numbers proportionally

But I'm more concerned with the abuse of the snap program, could one of the racist on the board, blackascoal or the thread starter kindly provide that info, since it seems to be your specialty
Click to expand...

One of the most consistent and tired defenses of America's congenital racism against black folk is the percentage game. If black people make up a percentage greater than what their 13% of the population is, then that makes them lazy ingrates unwilling to get off the government dole. The problem with that mindset is that it justifies or nullifies ANY use of the same federal program by whites because they are the majority of the population. Of course, raw numbers are wholly ignored, because when examined they actually put things in a different perspective. In other words, it's not the MAJORITY of welfare uses that are single parent white females that are utilizing the lion's share of the welfare budget, but the percentage of a percentage of the population that's the culprit, and those people must be generally lazy, promiscuous and crime prone. Yeah, that makes sense. :rolleyes:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Well, *that* doesn't sound very "non-partisan." Did you condemn Romney when he mocked the "47%"?

BTW, you took Obama's quote about Guns and Bibles out of context. I like your posts and you, but your cred is seriously deteriorating here.

"A political storm is brewing over Sen. Barack Obama's recent statements. Last Sunday, Obama was explaining his difficulty with winning over working-class voters in Pennsylvania and the Midwest, saying they have become frustrated with economic conditions:

"And it's not surprising then that they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations," Obama said."

He was actually expressing sympathy for those in sub-optimal economic straits, and his frustration in trying to reach them politically, but the RW wants to keep that out of context.

Link: https://www.christianitytoday.com/news/2008/april/obama-they-cling-to-guns-or-religion.html
Click to expand...

The typical Obama apologist using the bullshit context excuse. Pucker up.
 
Taichiliberal said:
One of the most consistent and tired defenses of America's congenital racism against black folk is the percentage game. If black people make up a percentage greater than what their 13% of the population is, then that makes them lazy ingrates unwilling to get off the government dole. The problem with that mindset is that it justifies or nullifies ANY use of the same federal program by whites because they are the majority of the population. Of course, raw numbers are wholly ignored, because when examined they actually put things in a different perspective. In other words, it's not the MAJORITY of welfare uses that are single parent white females that are utilizing the lion's share of the welfare budget, but the percentage of a percentage of the population that's the culprit, and those people must be generally lazy, promiscuous and crime prone. Yeah, that makes sense. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Raw numbers aren't ignored. They're used in calculating the proportions that show 1 in every 3 1/2 blacks and 1 in every 8 blacks use food stamps and welfare, respectively. Using the same raw numbers, it shows only 1 in 12 - 13 and 1 in 42 whites use those programs, respectively.

It's simple you fucking leftwing retard. Unless the raw numbers of whites using those programs is 5x more than the raw number of blacks, proportions are the way to put things on an equitable comparison. It's also simple. Blacks are far more likely to use such programs. When it comes to food stamps, 100 whites and 100 blacks could be lined up and a count started with each. By the time the first white person was reach based on proportions, there would already have been 3 blacks and close to 4. When it comes to welfare the same thing. The different is by the time the first white was counted based on proportions, there would have already been 5 blacks.

Ignore the truth if you want. The calculations have been done.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ahh, but you forget that in order to move an agenda you have to sell it to the people. And to the majority population who are NOT on welfare (who are still white), the common misconception is that the VAST majority of people on welfare are GENERATIONAL black folk. So when the greedy powers that be want full control and cooperation with their economic agenda to eliminate everything derived from The New Deal, it is necessary to push that racist button, because to date I have YET to see the MSM broadcast the FACT that the majority of folk on welfare are white, single parent women.
Click to expand...
Another one that doesn't understand proportionality.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top