Trump win on jan 6.

There's no debate about Trump's slush fund. Hillary was always smart. Who do you explain the 88% drop in donations by 2019?

Easy. Once they were out of power, the donators who believed their donations were granting them access quit. They believed it was buying them access. The corruption charges require proof of that.
Trump got huge illegal donations from foreigners in his inauguration ceremonies. Did they get a payoff? I don't know but they did it for possible payoffs. Many world leaders who came in to talk to Trump, opened with telling him they stayed in his overpriced hotel. Did they get a payoff?
Clinton was not getting paid by the Clinton foundation. He was not profiting off those donations. I am sure they thought he would look on them more favorably. That does not make it so.
 
Easy. Once they were out of power, the donators who believed their donations were granting them access quit. They believed it was buying them access. The corruption charges require proof of that.
Trump got huge illegal donations from foreigners in his inauguration ceremonies. Did they get a payoff? I don't know but they did it for possible payoffs. Many world leaders who came in to talk to Trump, opened with telling him they stayed in his overpriced hotel. Did they get a payoff?
Clinton was not getting paid by the Clinton foundation. He was not profiting off those donations. I am sure they thought he would look on them more favorably. That does not make it so.

you're a cretin.
 
Really.

Evidence exists. Denial of history.

Lie.

Lie.

Lie.

Lie.

Let's start with you showing proof of this imaginary voter fraud. You refer to it but never provide proof. If the reds had this proof, they would have presented it in court. They had over 60 opportunities. The judges said let's see it. It was not done . It does not exist.
Thune said this crazy Jan6th plan is stupid. He said it will be shot down like a dog. McConnell says not to do it, it is a waste of time.
But you believe in rt wing conspiracies. you always do and never learn when they fail over and over. The Reds do not have the votes and when it fails, you will type about the next one pretending all the previous ones do not exist.
 
Easy. Once they were out of power, the donators who believed their donations were granting them access quit. They believed it was buying them access. The corruption charges require proof of that.
Trump got huge illegal donations from foreigners in his inauguration ceremonies. Did they get a payoff? I don't know but they did it for possible payoffs. Many world leaders who came in to talk to Trump, opened with telling him they stayed in his overpriced hotel. Did they get a payoff?
Clinton was not getting paid by the Clinton foundation. He was not profiting off those donations. I am sure they thought he would look on them more favorably. That does not make it so.

What illegal donations? YAVC
 
Let's start with you showing proof of this imaginary voter fraud.
Evidence is not a proof. Evidence exists. RQAA.
You refer to it but never provide proof.
RQAA
If the reds had this proof, they would have presented it in court.
RQAA
They had over 60 opportunities.
There were not 60 lawsuits.
The judges said let's see it.
No judge ever did. Not what a judge does.
It was not done . It does not exist.
Yes it does. RQAA.
Thune said this crazy Jan6th plan is stupid.
The Constitution is not stupid not a 'crazy plan'.
He said it will be shot down like a dog.
You already ignore and deny the Constitution.
McConnell says not to do it, it is a waste of time.
Fake News.
But you believe in rt wing conspiracies.
Sure. The Republican party is a conspiracy. So is the Democrat party.
The Reds do not have the votes
Void argument fallacy.
and when it fails,
When what fails? Void argument fallacy.
you will type about the next one pretending all the previous ones do not exist.
The next what? The previous what? Do you have any idea what you are talking about? (no)
 
Let's start with you showing proof of this imaginary voter fraud. You refer to it but never provide proof. If the reds had this proof, they would have presented it in court. They had over 60 opportunities. The judges said let's see it. It was not done . It does not exist.
Thune said this crazy Jan6th plan is stupid. He said it will be shot down like a dog. McConnell says not to do it, it is a waste of time.
But you believe in rt wing conspiracies. you always do and never learn when they fail over and over. The Reds do not have the votes and when it fails, you will type about the next one pretending all the previous ones do not exist.

affidavits are technically considered evidence. you refuse to look at it.
 
Easy. Once they were out of power, the donators who believed their donations were granting them access quit. They believed it was buying them access. The corruption charges require proof of that.
Trump got huge illegal donations from foreigners in his inauguration ceremonies. Did they get a payoff? I don't know but they did it for possible payoffs. Many world leaders who came in to talk to Trump, opened with telling him they stayed in his overpriced hotel. Did they get a payoff?
Clinton was not getting paid by the Clinton foundation. He was not profiting off those donations. I am sure they thought he would look on them more favorably. That does not make it so.
Proof for court, not for those with common sense. OJ Simpson is innocent of his crimes just like Hillary Clinton is of hers. This isn't a matter of fucking lawyers, it's a matter of one side condoning the corruption of their own while finger-pointing about the corruption of the opposing party.

Everyone can see it but not everyone stands against it. I stand against it as proved by the vitriol spilled on people like me by the far Left Wing and far Right Wing.

What is your opinion of a person who sees a significant crime and fails to report it based solely on race? What about a person who fails to report it based solely on politics? Fails to report for any reason at all?

If you think little of such people, what reasons would you forgive them for their small participation in crimes? Obviously if one's family was threatened, that'd be a reason I'd forgive. What else?
 
Proof for court, not for those with common sense. OJ Simpson is innocent of his crimes just like Hillary Clinton is of hers. This isn't a matter of fucking lawyers, it's a matter of one side condoning the corruption of their own while finger-pointing about the corruption of the opposing party.

Everyone can see it but not everyone stands against it. I stand against it as proved by the vitriol spilled on people like me by the far Left Wing and far Right Wing.

What is your opinion of a person who sees a significant crime and fails to report it based solely on race? What about a person who fails to report it based solely on politics? Fails to report for any reason at all?

If you think little of such people, what reasons would you forgive them for their small participation in crimes? Obviously if one's family was threatened, that'd be a reason I'd forgive. What else?

aww, the hard done by centrist dillhole. so sad.
 
British : treated harshly or unfairly He felt very hard done by when he was laid off after many years of faithful service. Learn More about hard done by Share hard done by
 
Any last pretense of patriotism on your part ended the moment you supported Trump's plan to overturn the election.
There should be no doubt that a person who seeks to overturn an election is a domestic, or possibly foreign, enemy of the Constitution.

If Trump managed to turn the United States into a Third World shithole by imposing martial law and overturning the election, anyone supporting him should be treated as an enemy of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Unfortunately, too many Americans think all they need is a pink pussy hat and a piece of paper to protest such an action.
 
There should be no doubt that a person who seeks to overturn an election is a domestic, or possibly foreign, enemy of the Constitution.

If Trump managed to turn the United States into a Third World shithole by imposing martial law and overturning the election, anyone supporting him should be treated as an enemy of the Constitution of the United States of America.

Unfortunately, too many Americans think all they need is a pink pussy hat and a piece of paper to protest such an action.

except when neocon dems do it? or the allegations are correct?

you're an idiot.
 
The evidence proves you are correct, sir. I already saw Matt Dillon renege on his bet several times before his two week ban (Wolverine).

I'm not Wolverine, derp.

I did not renege, either. May I post the PM?

I'm just not that interested in politics if votes don't count and they can install a potato as president if they want.
 
I'm not sure if you two trumpworshipping morons can appear any more ignorant than you usually do, but I will be hear on Jan. 7th. to laugh at your lunacy anyway....lol
 
I'm not Wolverine, derp.

I did not renege, either. May I post the PM?

I'm just not that interested in politics if votes don't count and they can install a potato as president if they want.

So it's just coincidence both of you disappeared on the same day and reappeared together two weeks later, the ban time for Wolverine?

Is Wolverine just your evil twin?
 
Back
Top