TRUMPPERS, this is the question...

I do not know if the information is being kept from you. It is fair to ask if information is being kept from you, but not to assume that information exists because they are releasing this other information over there... That you (or I) are suspicious is not evidence.
TACO, 79, already said he would release the files... so. why does he need a preview before he decides?
 
Why are you guys all of a sudden interested in the list? You weren't for four years of Biden
Not, never was, just enjoying a MAGA conspiracy blowing up MAGA

And as for Biden, he just sat with the Trump DOJ findings, why would they proceed further, it was never a Democrat conspiracy or concern
 
That’s not true, Billy Barr investigated Epstein’s death, and his law firm defended Epstein a decade earlier, you really think Trump’s Cohen would arrest fellow Republicans
Poor anchovies, Brandon had four years in office with the files. Why were you alt lefties not screeching?
 
TACO, 79, already said he would release the files... so. why does he need a preview before he decides?
Again, be specific, what exactly should he release? Not "whatever he has", tell me what documents you have actual evidence or knowledge of that have not already been published. Speculation is not evidence. When I point out that I think the highly politicized environment of the last few years would almost certainly had such information "leaked" out if it had implicated Trump, that is speculation, but it is based on past experience and what we saw leaked during that period. We even had SCOTUS rulings "leaked" when they thought it would help them beat Trump. I do not believe that if they had actual evidence of something that Trump would have escaped a "leak" or two. This is speculation... but it is based on actual circumstances and what we have seen.

When you say that you are certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released, that they can release without regard to negative impact to victims, that also contains a whole ton of evidence against Trump you are basing this on what?
 
Hmmmmm, Lisa Murkowski claims “we are all afraid”

Why would she make such a claim, if they aren’t bullied?
Because she likes to cast shade, she thinks that she'll get in good with the leftists and then the Press will treat her like a friend rather than a republican.
 
Nonsense, she says it because it’s true.
lol. I think when she uses "we" she is often standing with the Democrats rather than Republicans. She's been a hero of the left regularly for the shade she casts in Trump's direction. Her past actions are the best predictive value of her future actions and the best way to define her current actions.
 
Again, be specific, what exactly should he release? Not "whatever he has", tell me what documents you have actual evidence or knowledge of that have not already been published. Speculation is not evidence. When I point out that I think the highly politicized environment of the last few years would almost certainly had such information "leaked" out if it had implicated Trump, that is speculation, but it is based on past experience and what we saw leaked during that period. We even had SCOTUS rulings "leaked" when they thought it would help them beat Trump. I do not believe that if they had actual evidence of something that Trump would have escaped a "leak" or two. This is speculation... but it is based on actual circumstances and what we have seen.

When you say that you are certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released, that they can release without regard to negative impact to victims, that also contains a whole ton of evidence against Trump you are basing this on what?
I never said I am certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released.

If its all been released, why does TACO, 79 not say so?

You are playing Pollyanna. I do not know what is still there that has not been released, but Blondi herself has said there is more.

While its not enough evidence for a court, there is plenty suggesting there is more.
 
lol. I think when she uses "we" she is often standing with the Democrats rather than Republicans. She's been a hero of the left regularly for the shade she casts in Trump's direction. Her past actions are the best predictive value and the best way to define her current actions.
I think Murkowski is more aware of what her fellow Republicans say in private than yourself.
 
I never said I am certain there is a whole pile of information that hasn't been released.

If its all been released, why does TACO, 79 not say so?

You are playing Pollyanna. I do not know what is still there that has not been released, but Blondi herself has said there is more.

While its not enough evidence for a court, there is plenty suggesting there is more.
It is solely the nature of the stacks and stacks papers that you think may exist you are speculating on then? Based on nothing at all but your wishes and "suggestion" that all Trump would need to satisfy you with is "they've already been released" statements... Gotcha.

At least I speculate based on actual past leaks and predict behavior through those actions (Past behavior is always the best predictor of the future or current behavior of others). Though, I also admit it is speculation.

I do know I will be entertained, but I also know that you are simply speculating yourself into a conspiracy theory. I believe, based on your past actions, that if Trump had said all relevant files had been released you would not believe him.
 
I think Murkowski is more aware of what her fellow Republicans say in private than yourself.
I believe that we are all aware that Murkowski says things to cast shade at Trump, and believe that Republicans are not "cowed" by Trump. Nor do I believe that she is afraid, she's already won an election while casting shade on Trump, his threats not to support her candidacy would hold no power over her.

When she says this kind of thing I always take it with the knowledge that "we" isn't republicans. Shen she says "we" she includes herself and her imagination she is rarely on board with other republicans.
 
I believe that we are all aware that Murkowski says things to cast shade at Trump, and believe that Republicans are not "cowed" by Trump. Nor do I believe that she is afraid, she's already won an election while casting shade on Trump, his threats would hold no power over her.

When she says this kind of thing I always take it with the knowledge that "we" isn't republicans. Shen she says "we" she includes herself and her imagination she is rarely on board with other republicans.
Lol. You believe what you wish. It’s not based on any type of fact. Murkowski is on the inside. You aren’t.
 
I will answer your question when you address your president and this forum with a bit more respect.

Stick your derogatory terms where the sun don't shine fake lawyer.



475899378_122143124084382752_7460763888906921189_n.jpg
 
Back
Top