Trump’s job approval shows the Democrats’ dilemma in 2018

C

cancel2 2022

Canceled
Summary: After one year in office, after 12 months of continuous bombardment by his political foes, Trump's job approval numbers have held steady for six months (they dropped after the honeymoon). This is key to understanding the current situation in US politics — and what lies ahead in the potentially decisive 2018 and 2020 elections.

https://fabiusmaximus.com/2018/01/10/trump-job-approval-and-the-elections/

8649768ce147e4c5936ff725e81be917.jpg


Even the NYT is starting to get the message.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/01/...8/01/10/trump-job-approval-and-the-elections/

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
First, people who go into the White House to have a meeting with President Trump usually leave pleasantly surprised. They find that Trump is not the raving madman they expected from his tweetstorms or the media coverage. They generally say that he is affable, if repetitive. He runs a normal, good meeting and seems well-informed enough to get by.

Second, people who work in the Trump administration have wildly divergent views about their boss. Some think he is a deranged child, as Michael Wolff reported. But some think he is merely a distraction they can work around. Some think he is strange, but not impossible. Some genuinely admire Trump.

Third, the White House is getting more professional. Imagine if Trump didn’t tweet. The craziness of the past weeks would be out of the way, and we’d see a White House that is briskly pursuing its goals: the shift in our Pakistan policy, the shift in our offshore drilling policy, the fruition of our ISIS policy, the nomination for judgeships and the formation of policies on infrastructure, DACA, North Korea and trade.

++

amazing praise and clarity from the self described #nerverTrump Brooks.
 
I guess that shithole should have have been in title, that appears to be the trigger word for today.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
anatta said:
First, people who go into the White House to have a meeting with President Trump usually leave pleasantly surprised. They find that Trump is not the raving madman they expected from his tweetstorms or the media coverage. They generally say that he is affable, if repetitive. He runs a normal, good meeting and seems well-informed enough to get by.

Second, people who work in the Trump administration have wildly divergent views about their boss. Some think he is a deranged child, as Michael Wolff reported. But some think he is merely a distraction they can work around. Some think he is strange, but not impossible. Some genuinely admire Trump.

Third, the White House is getting more professional. Imagine if Trump didn’t tweet. The craziness of the past weeks would be out of the way, and we’d see a White House that is briskly pursuing its goals: the shift in our Pakistan policy, the shift in our offshore drilling policy, the fruition of our ISIS policy, the nomination for judgeships and the formation of policies on infrastructure, DACA, North Korea and trade.

++

amazing praise and clarity from the self described #nerverTrump Brooks.
Click to expand...
Yes indeed, it seemingly killed him to say it but at least he has some semblance of journalistic integrity.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
Trump didn't even win this one in numbers. Somehow as their approval rating goes down, and Obama's, and Obamacare's flow up like a fizzy beer, we're in trouble in the book of stupid. I'm sure the next chapter will be: Your friend velcro.
 
evince said:
how the fuck did he win then asshole?

by cheating huh
Click to expand...

There's a theory that a sizable portion of the electorate support Trump, but won't admit it in public. Because, ya know, they don't want to falsely be called racist and such. The rabid level of hatred and venom directed at Trump and those who support him has some people fearful that if they admit it, they would lose friends over it.
 
Sirthinksalot said:
There's a theory that a sizable portion of the electorate support Trump, but won't admit it in public. Because, ya know, they don't want to falsely be called racist and such. The rabid level of hatred and venom directed at Trump and those who support him has some people fearful that if they admit it, they would lose friends over it.
Click to expand...
I have personally been "unfriended" on FB by 2 people I thought would know better.
They were hysterical about Trump hating gays or causing nuclear war.

Then there is the everyday common ordinary Trump Derangement Syndrome we see every day by fake news
 
how does that comport with the FACT he got three million less votes than hilary


the people didnt pick trump

republican and russian cheating picked him
 
anatta said:
I have personally been "unfriended" on FB by 2 people I thought would know better.
They were hysterical about Trump hating gays or causing nuclear war.

Then there is the everyday common ordinary Trump Derangement Syndrome we see every day by fake news
Click to expand...

I'm not on FB, but I know plenty of people who have been unfriended, excluded from groups and no longer get invited to certain parties because of posting pro Trump things. So much for the tolerant left.
 
do you know how it feels to have someone try and tell you their lies are true

then they refuse all reliable sources and simply say Fox News?


that is why

its hard to like people who are blathed in lies and believing propaganda


you idiots refuse all provable facts


it shows how vulnerable and stupid you are
 
evince said:
how does that comport with the FACT he got three million less votes than hilary
Click to expand...

Ah, the old "but, but, but Hillary won the popular vote" sniveling. :(

the people didnt pick trump
Click to expand...

The electoral college did, and that's how the Constitution says we determine who the president is.

republican and russian cheating picked him
Click to expand...

There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE of Russian interference in the election. But go ahead and keep whining.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top