Trump’s lawsuit against Bob Woodward is absurd — and dangerous

Uncensored2008 said:
Of course you're lying - and I have no doubt that you don't even know you are. You are , after all, a mere drone - vomiting out the hate the hivemind programs you with.

{In a $49 million suit against the veteran Washington Post reporter, publisher, Simon & Schuster, and its parent company, Paramount Global, Trump accused Woodward of carrying out "systematic usurpation, manipulation, and exploitation of audio" }

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...suit-against-bob-woodward-in-full/ar-AA16VKZQ

It is of course, a defamation suit. I explained earlier why the last legitimate president will probably not win, but you drones are not sentient and cannot grasp even the most simple concepts. The Reich fills you with hate - and that is the extent of your cognitive process.
Click to expand...

I asked you for a specific lie Woodward told, and instead you're attacking me. It's just a sign you're angry at Woodward for publishing what twump said.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Tapes which don't support the slander in his books.

I get that you're a mindless sycophant who has spent years on a 24/7 hate against the enemy of your Reich. The reality is that Woodward did what Woodward does - lied.
Click to expand...

You get nothing, as usual. Woodward cannot be sued. He has proof in Daffy Donald's own words. Woodward is an esteemed reporter. You are a right-wing Trumpian. I think he has the goods and you are flailing away again.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yawning ≠ shrieking no matter how hard you scrinch up your eyes and butthole and wish it were so.

Next troll post, please? :rofl2:
Click to expand...

It's the same anger the MAGAs have always had since twump came onto the political scene: "Don't talk about what twump says and does". They're just embarrassed for supporting him and their directing their rage at everyone else.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Woodward lied to slander and libel Trump.

We sue for defamation in this country.
Click to expand...

The Lawsuit is about the Audiobook Woodward just released! Trump says he didn't approve of an Audiobook!

Trump approved of the audio recordings!

After the first 3 Woodward Books came out, Trump tried to accuse Bob Woodward of lying in his book.

So, if anyone slandered or defamed anyone, it was Trump Slandering and Defaming himself! :laugh:

Audio recordings don't lie, and this is why Woodward let Donnie tell his stories on tape, so he wouldn't be accused of lying!

BUT HERE YOU ARE ACCUSING WOODWARD OF LYING, SLANDERING, AND DEFAMING TRUMP!

DUDE PLEASE STOP THE BUTT HURT!

Thank You in advance!
 
Last edited:
Uncensored2008 said:
Your fellow fascist just said the opposite, that the case DOES get reviewed.

And of course it does - it's moronic to claim otherwise - which you only do because you are a mindless sycophant who will tell literally any lie - no mater how retarded, in order to further the agenda of your party.




No case gets into the civil courts without a preliminary review, Phantasmal is correct on that point.

You spew the idiocy above because Seig Heil.

Any lie to further the Reich, no matter HOW fucking stupid it and you must be. Party above all is the democrat credo.
Click to expand...

Can you read a fucking chart, birdbrain?

https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/civil-case-flowchart

A judge is not even assigned until after service on the other parties. My God, you are fucking stupid.
 
LurchAddams said:
It's the same anger the MAGAs have always had since twump came onto the political scene: "Don't talk about what twump says and does". They're just embarrassed for supporting him and their directing their rage at everyone else.
Click to expand...

Good point. It's our fault, plus the fault of the "fake news," that he's in so much trouble. lol
 
It’s not a defamation lawsuit. Trump is suing Woodward because he wants money made off a book written about him. It’s liaughabke. Birdbrain doesn’t even get that part right.
 
LurchAddams said:
Look at all the anger directed at us. It's a stark demonstration of their inner shame.
Click to expand...

You're so kind. IMO they are incapable of shame. I think it's disappointment and rage that their Gropingfuehrer is not going to be making a comeback and catsuping up our White House ever again. It's also rage that the current occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania NW is doing an outstanding job. Especially for being a weak, dementia-afflicted pedophile. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
ThatOwlWoman said:
You're so kind. IMO they are incapable of shame. I think it's disappointment and rage that their Gropingfuehrer is not going to be making a comeback and catsuping up our White House ever again. It's also rage that the current occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania NW is going an outstanding job. Especially for being a weak, dementia-afflicted pedophile. :laugh:
Click to expand...

And that's the other thing. All we and the media do is talk about what twump and other MAGAs actually say and do. The MAGAs need to make stuff up - horrible stuff, like Joe being a pedophile. It's a sickness with the MAGAs.
 
Phantasmal said:
Ramblings
Click to expand...

Which part? That Woodward lied to smear your little tin god?

{Leveling one of the more serious charges that a defense secretary could make against a commander in chief sending forces into combat, Gates asserts that Obama had more than doubts about the course he had charted in Afghanistan. The president was “skeptical if not outright convinced it would fail,” Gates writes in “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War.”

Read that again. According to Woodward, it is a serious charge against a president to say that he had doubts about the "course he had charted." Since the same author wrote three increasingly critical books about a certain former president who never expressed the slightest doubts about disastrous policy choices, you would think Woodward might know better. Apparently not.}

https://newrepublic.com/article/116...rs-criticism-obama-not-what-bob-woodward-says

You love Woodward now, he attacks the object of your insanity - but 8 years ago, you hated him for speaking against Obama.

democrats are such frauds.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Which part? That Woodward lied to smear your little tin god?

{Leveling one of the more serious charges that a defense secretary could make against a commander in chief sending forces into combat, Gates asserts that Obama had more than doubts about the course he had charted in Afghanistan. The president was “skeptical if not outright convinced it would fail,” Gates writes in “Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War.”

Read that again. According to Woodward, it is a serious charge against a president to say that he had doubts about the "course he had charted." Since the same author wrote three increasingly critical books about a certain former president who never expressed the slightest doubts about disastrous policy choices, you would think Woodward might know better. Apparently not.}

https://newrepublic.com/article/116...rs-criticism-obama-not-what-bob-woodward-says

You love Woodward now, he attacks the object of your insanity - but 8 years ago, you hated him for speaking against Obama.

democrats are such frauds.
Click to expand...

You are not capable of understanding that your post proved Woodward is a reporter and reports what he finds. He was not after trump. Just reporting what he said. It was the same when Obama was in office. He reports the facts. Good thing you agree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top